@article{EdelmannMusialBrightGelbrichetal.2016,
  author    = {Edelmann, Frank and Musial-Bright, Lindy and Gelbrich, Goetz and Trippel, Tobias and Radenovic, Sara and Wachter, Rolf and Inkrot, Simone and Loncar, Goran and Tahirovic, Elvis and Celic, Vera and Veskovic, Jovan and Zdravkovic, Marija and Lainscak, Mitja and Apostolović, Svetlana and Neskovic, Aleksandar N. and Pieske, Burkert and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk},
  title     = {Tolerability and feasibility of beta-blocker titration in HFpEF versus HFrEF: Insights from the CIBIS-ELD trial},
  series = {JACC: Heart Failure},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {JACC: Heart Failure},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.008},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191022},
  pages     = {140-149},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the tolerability and feasibility of titration of 2 distinctly acting beta-blockers (BB) in elderly heart failure patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. BACKGROUND: Broad evidence supports the use of BB in HFrEF, whereas the evidence for beta blockade in HFpEF is uncertain. METHODS: In the CIBIS-ELD (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly) trial, patients >65 years of age with HFrEF (n = 626) or HFpEF (n = 250) were randomized to bisoprolol or carvedilol. Both BB were up-titrated to the target or maximum tolerated dose. Follow-up was performed after 12 weeks. HFrEF and HFpEF patients were compared regarding tolerability and clinical effects (heart rate, blood pressure, systolic and diastolic functions, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute-walk distance, quality of life, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: For both of the BBs, tolerability and daily dose at 12 weeks were similar. HFpEF patients demonstrated higher rates of dose escalation delays and treatment-related side effects. Similar HR reductions were observed in both groups (HFpEF: 6.6 beats/min; HFrEF: 6.9 beats/min, p = NS), whereas greater improvement in NYHA functional class was observed in HFrEF (HFpEF: 23\% vs. HFrEF: 34\%, p < 0.001). Mean E/e' and left atrial volume index did not change in either group, although E/A increased in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: BB tolerability was comparable between HFrEF and HFpEF. Relevant reductions of HR and blood pressure occurred in both groups. However, only HFrEF patients experienced considerable improvements in clinical parameters and Left ventricular function. Interestingly, beta-blockade had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function in either group. Long-term studies using modern diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are urgently needed to establish whether BB therapy exerts significant clinical benefit in HFpEF. (Comparison of Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in Elderly Heart Failure HF] Patients: A Randomised, Double-Blind Multicentre Study CIBIS-ELD]; ISRCTN34827306).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SeegersZabelGrueteretal.2015,
  author    = {Seegers, Joachim and Zabel, Markus and Gr{\"u}ter, Timo and Ammermann, Antje and Weber-Kr{\"u}ger, Mark and Edelmann, Frank and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Binder, Lutz and Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph and Gr{\"o}schel, Klaus and Hasenfuß, Gerd and Feltgen, Nicolas and Pieske, Burkert and Wachter, Rolf},
  title     = {Natriuretic peptides for the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation},
  series = {Open Heart},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {Open Heart},
  number    = {e000182},
  doi       = {10.1136/openhrt-2014-000182},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-149939},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background and purpose: Silent atrial fibrillation (AF) and tachycardia (AT) are considered precursors of ischaemic stroke. Therefore, detection of paroxysmal atrial rhythm disorders is highly relevant, but is clinically challenging. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of natriuretic peptide levels in the detection of paroxysmal AT/AF in a pilot study. Methods: Natriuretic peptide levels were analysed in two independent patient cohorts (162 patients with arterial hypertension or other cardiovascular risk factors and 82 patients with retinal vessel disease). N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and BNP were measured before the start of a 7-day Holter monitoring period carefully screened for AT/AF. Results: 244 patients were included; 16 had paroxysmal AT/AF. After excluding patients with a history of AT/AF (n=5), 14 patients had newly diagnosed AT/AF (5.8\%) NT-proBNP and BNP levels were higher in patients with paroxysmal AT/AF in both cohorts: (1) 154.4 (IQR 41.7; 303.6) versus 52.8 (30.4; 178.0) pg/mL and 70.0 (31.9; 142.4) versus 43.9 (16.3; 95.2) and (2) 216.9 (201.4; 277.1) versus 90.8 (42.3-141.7) and 96.0 (54.7; 108.2) versus 29.1 (12.0; 58.1). For the detection of AT/AF episodes, NT-proBNP and BNP had an area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic analysis of 0.76 (95\% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; p=0.002) and 0.75 (0.61 to 0.89; p=0.004), respectively. Conclusions: NT-proBNP and BNP levels are elevated in patients with silent AT/AF as compared with sinus rhythm. Thus, screening for undiagnosed paroxysmal AF using natriuretic peptide level initiated Holter monitoring may be a useful strategy in prevention of stroke or systemic embolism.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EdelmannWachterDuengenetal.2011,
  author    = {Edelmann, Frank and Wachter, Rolf and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Richter, Annette and Stahrenberg, Raoul and Neumann, Till and L{\"u}ers, Claus and Angermann, Christiane E. and Mehrhof, Felix and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Pieske, Burkert},
  title     = {Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline},
  series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  number    = {15},
  doi       = {10.1186/1475-2840-10-15},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140397},
  pages     = {1-8},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background: To assess heart failure therapies in diabetic patients with preserved as compared to impaired systolic ventricular function. Methods: 3304 patients with heart failure from 9 different studies were included (mean age 63 +/- 14 years); out of these, 711 subjects had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>= 50\%) and 994 patients in the whole cohort suffered from diabetes. Results: The majority (>90\%) of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (SHF) and diabetes were treated with an ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or with beta-blockers. By contrast, patients with diabetes and preserved ejection fraction (HFNEF) were less likely to receive these substance classes (p < 0.001) and had a worse blood pressure control (p < 0.001). In comparison to patients without diabetes, the probability to receive these therapies was increased in diabetic HFNEF patients (p < 0.001), but not in diabetic SHF patients. Aldosterone receptor blockers were given more often to diabetic patients with reduced ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and the presence and severity of diabetes decreased the probability to receive this substance class, irrespective of renal function. Conclusions: Diabetic patients with HFNEF received less heart failure medication and showed a poorer control of blood pressure as compared to diabetic patients with SHF. SHF patients with diabetes were less likely to receive aldosterone receptor blocker therapy, irrespective of renal function.},
  language  = {en}
}