@article{SalingerHuLiuetal.2018, author = {Salinger, Tim and Hu, Kai and Liu, Dan and Taleh, Scharoch and Herrmann, Sebastian and Oder, Daniel and Gensler, Daniel and M{\"u}ntze, Jonas and Ertl, Georg and Lorenz, Kristina and Frantz, Stefan and Weidemann, Frank and Nordbeck, Peter}, title = {Association between Comorbidities and Progression of Transvalvular Pressure Gradients in Patients with Moderate and Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis}, series = {Cardiology Research and Practice}, journal = {Cardiology Research and Practice}, doi = {10.1155/2018/3713897}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227291}, pages = {3713897, 1-7}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background. Fast progression of the transaortic mean gradient (P-mean) is relevant for clinical decision making of valve replacement in patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients. However, there is currently little knowledge regarding the determinants affecting progression of transvalvular gradient in AS patients. Methods. This monocentric retrospective study included consecutive patients presenting with at least two transthoracic echocardiography examinations covering a time interval of one year or more between April 2006 and February 2016 and diagnosed as moderate or severe aortic stenosis at the final echocardiographic examination. Laboratory parameters, medication, and prevalence of eight known cardiac comorbidities and risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, peripheral artery occlusive disease, cerebrovascular disease, renal dysfunction, body mass index >= 30 Kg/m(2), and history of smoking) were analyzed. Patients were divided into slow (P-mean < 5 mmHg/year) or fast (P-mean >= 5 mmHg/year) progression groups. Results. A total of 402 patients (mean age 78 +/- 9.4 years, 58\% males) were included in the study. Mean follow-up duration was 3.4 +/- 1.9 years. The average number of cardiac comorbidities and risk factors was 3.1 +/- 1.6. Average number of cardiac comorbidities and risk factors was higher in patients in slow progression group than in fast progression group (3.3 +/- 1.5 vs 2.9 +/- 1.7; P = 0.036). Patients in slow progression group had more often coronary heart disease (49.2\% vs 33.6\%; P = 0.003) compared to patients in fast progression group. LDL-cholesterol values were lower in the slow progression group (100 +/- 32.6 mg/dl vs 110.8 +/- 36.6 mg/dl; P = 0.005). Conclusion. These findings suggest that disease progression of aortic valve stenosis is faster in patients with fewer cardiac comorbidities and risk factors, especially if they do not have coronary heart disease. Further prospective studies are warranted to investigate the outcome of patients with slow versus fast progression of transvalvular gradient with regards to comorbidities and risk factors.}, language = {en} } @article{ManiucSalingerAndersetal.2019, author = {Maniuc, Octavian and Salinger, Tim and Anders, Fabian and M{\"u}ntze, Jonas and Liu, Dan and Hu, Kai and Ertl, Georg and Frantz, Stefan and Nordbeck, Peter}, title = {Impella CP use in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock}, series = {ESC Heart Failure}, volume = {6}, journal = {ESC Heart Failure}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1002/ehf2.12446}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202794}, pages = {863- 866}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Aims From the various mechanical cardiac assist devices and indications available, the use of the percutaneous intraventricular Impella CP pump is usually restricted to acute ischaemic shock or prophylactic indications in high-risk interventions. In the present study, we investigated clinical usefulness of the Impella CP device in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock as compared with acute ischaemia. Methods and results In this retrospective single-centre analysis, patients who received an Impella CP at the University Hospital W{\"u}rzburg between 2013 and 2017 due to non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock were age-matched 2:1 with patients receiving the device due to ischaemic cardiogenic shock. Inclusion criteria were therapy refractory haemodynamic instability with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and serum lactate >2.0 mmol/L at implantation. Basic clinical data, indications for mechanical ventricular support, and outcome were obtained in all patients with non-ischaemic as well as ischaemic shock and compared between both groups. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (quartiles). Categorical variables are presented as count and per cent. Twenty-five patients had cardiogenic shock due to non-ischaemic reasons and were compared with 50 patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction. Resuscitation rates before implantation of Impella CP were high (32 vs. 42\%; P = 0.402). At implantation, patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock had lower levels of high-sensitive troponin T (110.65 [57.87-322.1] vs. 1610 [450.8-3861.5] pg/mL; P = 0.001) and lactate dehydrogenase (377 [279-608] vs. 616 [371.3-1109] U/L; P = 0.007), while age (59 ± 16 vs. 61.7 ± 11; P = 0.401), glomerular filtration rate (43.5 [33.2-59.7] vs. 48 [35.75-69] mL/min; P = 0.290), C-reactive protein (5.17 [3.27-10.26] vs. 10.97 [3.23-17.2] mg/dL; P = 0.195), catecholamine index (30.6 [10.6-116.9] vs. 47.6 [11.7-90] μg/kg/min; P = 0.663), and serum lactate (2.6 [2.2-5.8] vs. 2.9 [1.3-6.6] mmol/L; P = 0.424) were comparable between both groups. There was a trend for longer duration of Impella support in the non-ischaemic groups (5 [2-7.5] vs. 3 [2-5.25] days, P = 0.211). Rates of haemodialysis (52 vs. 47\%; P = 0.680) and transition to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (13.6 vs. 22.2\%; P = 0.521) were comparable. No significant difference was found regarding both 30 day survival (48 vs. 30\%; P = 0.126) and in-hospital mortality (66.7 vs. 74\%; P = 0.512), although there was a trend for better survival in the non-ischaemic group. Conclusions These data suggest that temporary use of the Impella CP device might be a useful therapeutic option for bridge to recovery not only in ischaemic but also in non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock.}, language = {en} } @article{SalingerHuLiuetal.2017, author = {Salinger, Tim and Hu, Kai and Liu, Dan and Herrmann, Sebastian and Lorenz, Kristina and Ertl, Georg and Nordbeck, Peter}, title = {Cardiac amyloidosis mimicking severe aortic valve stenosis - a case report demonstrating diagnostic pitfalls and role of dobutamine stress echocardiography}, series = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders}, volume = {17}, journal = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders}, number = {86}, doi = {10.1186/s12872-017-0519-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-171109}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background Aortic valve stenosis is a common finding diagnosed with high sensitivity in transthoracic echocardiography, but the examiner often finds himself confronted with uncertain results in patients with moderate pressure gradients and concomitant systolic heart failure. While patients with true-severe low-gradient aortic valve stenosis with either reduced or preserved left ventricular systolic function are primarily candidates for valve replacement, there is a relevant proportion of patients with pseudo-severe aortic valve stenosis anticipated not to benefit but actually rather deteriorate by interventional therapy or surgery. Case presentation In this article we present a case report of a male patient with pseudo-severe aortic valve stenosis due to cardiac amyloidosis highlighting the diagnostic schedule. The patient underwent stress echocardiography because of discrepant findings in transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization regarding the severity of aortic valve stenosis. After evaluation of the results, it became clear that he had a need for optimum heart failure medication and implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. Conclusion Due to the pitfalls in conventional as well as invasive diagnostics at rest, Stress echocardiography should be considered part of the standard optimum diagnostic spectrum in all unclear or borderline cases in order to confirm the correct diagnosis and constitute optimal therapy.}, language = {en} }