@phdthesis{Nahler2001, author = {Nahler, Michael}, title = {Isomorphism classes of almost completely decomposable groups}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-2817}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2001}, abstract = {In this thesis we investigate near-isomorphism classes and isomorphism classes of almost completely decomposable groups. In Chapter 2 we introduce the concept of almost completely decomposable groups and sum up their most important facts. A local group is an almost completely decomposable group with a primary regulator quotient. A uniform group is a rigid local group with a homocyclic regulator quotient. In Chapter 3 a weakening of isomorphism, called type-isomorphism, appears. It is shown that type-isomorphism agrees with Lady's near-isomorphism. By the Main Decomposition Theorem and the Primary Reduction Theorem we are allowed to restrict ourselves on clipped local groups, namely groups without a direct rank-one summand. In Chapter 4 we collect facts of matrices over commutative rings with an identity element. Matrices over the local ring (Z / p^e Z) of residue classes of the rational integers modulo a prime power play an important role. In Chapter 5 we introduce representing matrices of finite essential extensions. Here a normal form for local groups is found by the Gauß algorithm. Uniform groups have representing matrices in Hermite normal form. The classification problems for almost completely decomposable groups up to isomorphism and up to near-isomorphism can be rephrased as equivalence problems for the representing matrices. In Chapter 6 we derive a criterion for the representing matrices of local groups in Gauß normal form. In Chapter 7 we formulate the matrix criterion for uniform groups. Two representing matrices in Hermite normal form describe isomorphic groups if and only if the rest blocks of the representing matrices are T-diagonally equivalent. Starting from a fixed near-isomorphism class in Chapter 8 we investigate isomorphism classes of uniform groups. We count groups and isomorphism classes. In Chapter 9 we specialize on uniform groups of rank 2r with a regulator quotient of rank r such that the rest block of the representing matrix is invertible and normed.}, subject = {Fast vollst{\"a}ndig zerlegbare Gruppe}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Reith2001, author = {Reith, Steffen}, title = {Generalized Satisfiability Problems}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-74}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2001}, abstract = {In the last 40 years, complexity theory has grown to a rich and powerful field in theoretical computer science. The main task of complexity theory is the classification of problems with respect to their consumption of resources (e.g., running time or required memory). To study the computational complexity (i.e., consumption of resources) of problems, similar problems are grouped into so called complexity classes. During the systematic study of numerous problems of practical relevance, no efficient algorithm for a great number of studied problems was found. Moreover, it was unclear whether such algorithms exist. A major breakthrough in this situation was the introduction of the complexity classes P and NP and the identification of hardest problems in NP. These hardest problems of NP are nowadays known as NP-complete problems. One prominent example of an NP-complete problem is the satisfiability problem of propositional formulas (SAT). Here we get a propositional formula as an input and it must be decided whether an assignment for the propositional variables exists, such that this assignment satisfies the given formula. The intensive study of NP led to numerous related classes, e.g., the classes of the polynomial-time hierarchy PH, P, \#P, PP, NL, L and \#L. During the study of these classes, problems related to propositional formulas were often identified to be complete problems for these classes. Hence some questions arise: Why is SAT so hard to solve? Are there modifications of SAT which are complete for other well-known complexity classes? In the context of these questions a result by E. Post is extremely useful. He identified and characterized all classes of Boolean functions being closed under superposition. It is possible to study problems which are connected to generalized propositional logic by using this result, which was done in this thesis. Hence, many different problems connected to propositional logic were studied and classified with respect to their computational complexity, clearing the borderline between easy and hard problems.}, subject = {Erf{\"u}llbarkeitsproblem}, language = {en} }