@article{GrunzPennigFieberetal.2021,
  author    = {Grunz, Jan-Peter and Pennig, Lenhard and Fieber, Tabea and Gietzen, Carsten Herbert and Heidenreich, Julius Frederik and Huflage, Henner and Gruschwitz, Philipp and Kuhl, Philipp Josef and Petritsch, Bernhard and Kosmala, Aleksander and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Gassenmaier, Tobias},
  title     = {Twin robotic x-ray system in small bone and joint trauma: Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on treatment decisions},
  series = {European Radiology},
  volume    = {31},
  journal   = {European Radiology},
  issn      = {0938-7994},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00330-020-07563-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235233},
  pages     = {3600-3609},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objectives Trauma evaluation of extremities can be challenging in conventional radiography. A multi-use x-ray system with cone-beam CT (CBCT) option facilitates ancillary 3-D imaging without repositioning. We assessed the clinical value of CBCT scans by analyzing the influence of additional findings on therapy. Methods Ninety-two patients underwent radiography and subsequent CBCT imaging with the twin robotic scanner (76 wrist/hand/finger and 16 ankle/foot/toe trauma scans). Reports by on-call radiologists before and after CBCT were compared regarding fracture detection, joint affliction, comminuted injuries, and diagnostic confidence. An orthopedic surgeon recommended therapy based on reported findings. Surgical reports (N = 52) and clinical follow-up (N = 85) were used as reference standard. Results CBCT detected more fractures (83/64 of 85), joint involvements (69/53 of 71), and multi-fragment situations (68/50 of 70) than radiography (all p < 0.001). Six fractures suspected in radiographs were ruled out by CBCT. Treatment changes based on additional information from CBCT were recommended in 29 patients (31.5\%). While agreement between advised therapy before CBCT and actual treatment was moderate (κ = 0.41 [95\% confidence interval 0.35-0.47]; p < 0.001), agreement after CBCT was almost perfect (κ = 0.88 [0.83-0.93]; p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased considerably for CBCT studies (p < 0.001). Median effective dose for CBCT was 4.3 μSv [3.3-5.3 μSv] compared to 0.2 μSv [0.1-0.2 μSv] for radiography. Conclusions CBCT provides advantages for the evaluation of acute small bone and joint trauma by detecting and excluding extremity fractures and fracture-related findings more reliably than radiographs. Additional findings induced therapy change in one third of patients, suggesting substantial clinical impact.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GruschwitzHartungKleefeldtetal.2023,
  author    = {Gruschwitz, Philipp and Hartung, Viktor and Kleefeldt, Florian and Erg{\"u}n, S{\"u}leyman and Lichthardt, Sven and Huflage, Henner and Hendel, Robin and Kunz, Andreas Steven and Pannenbecker, Pauline and Kuhl, Philipp Josef and Augustin, Anne Marie and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Petritsch, Bernhard and Grunz, Jan-Peter},
  title     = {Standardized assessment of vascular reconstruction kernels in photon-counting CT angiographies of the leg using a continuous extracorporeal perfusion model},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-023-39063-z},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357912},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {This study evaluated the influence of different vascular reconstruction kernels on the image quality of CT angiographies of the lower extremity runoff using a 1st-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) compared with dose-matched examinations on a 3rd-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). Inducing continuous extracorporeal perfusion in a human cadaveric model, we performed CT angiographies of eight upper leg arterial runoffs with radiation dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (CTDIvol 5 mGy). Reconstructions were executed with different vascular kernels, matching the individual modulation transfer functions between scanners. Signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) were computed to assess objective image quality. Six radiologists evaluated image quality subjectively using a forced-choice pairwise comparison tool. Interrater agreement was determined by calculating Kendall's concordance coefficient (W). The intraluminal attenuation of PCD-CT images was significantly higher than of EID-CT (414.7 ± 27.3 HU vs. 329.3 ± 24.5 HU; p < 0.001). Using comparable kernels, image noise with PCD-CT was significantly lower than with EID-CT (p ≤ 0.044). Correspondingly, SNR and CNR were approximately twofold higher for PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Increasing the spatial frequency for PCD-CT reconstructions by one level resulted in similar metrics compared to EID-CT (CNRfat; EID-CT Bv49: 21.7 ± 3.7 versus PCD-CT Bv60: 21.4 ± 3.5). Overall image quality of PCD-CTA achieved ratings superior to EID-CTA irrespective of the used reconstruction kernels (best: PCD-CT Bv60; worst: EID-CT Bv40; p < 0.001). Interrater agreement was good (W = 0.78). Concluding, PCD-CT offers superior intraluminal attenuation, SNR, and CNR compared to EID-CT in angiographies of the upper leg arterial runoff. Combined with improved subjective image quality, PCD-CT facilitates the use of sharper convolution kernels and ultimately bears the potential of improved vascular structure assessability.},
  language  = {en}
}