@article{DetomasAltieriDeutschbeinetal.2022,
  author    = {Detomas, Mario and Altieri, Barbara and Deutschbein, Timo and Fassnacht, Martin and Dischinger, Ulrich},
  title     = {Metyrapone versus osilodrostat in the short-term therapy of endogenous Cushing's syndrome: results from a single center cohort study},
  series = {Frontiers in Endocrinology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Endocrinology},
  issn      = {1664-2392},
  doi       = {10.3389/fendo.2022.903545},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-277477},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Although surgery is considered the first-line treatment for patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS), medical therapy is often required to control severe hypercortisolism. Metyrapone and osilodrostat are both steroidogenic inhibitors targeting the 11β-hydroxylase, however, their therapeutic effectiveness has not yet been directly compared. This study aimed to evaluate metyrapone and osilodrostat in the short-term therapy of CS. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with endogenous CS treated with metyrapone or osilodrostat as monotherapy for at least 4 weeks. Main outcome measures were serum cortisol and 24h urinary free cortisol (UFC) at baseline (T0) and after 2 (T1), 4 (T2), and 12 weeks (T3) of therapy. Results 16 patients with endogenous CS were identified (pituitary n=7, adrenal n=4, ectopic CS n=5). Each 8 patients were treated with metyrapone and osilodrostat. Despite heterogeneity, both groups showed comparable mean UFC levels at T0 (metyrapone: 758 µg/24h vs osilodrostat: 817 µg/24h; p=0.93). From T0 to T1, the decrease of UFC was less pronounced under metyrapone than osilodrostat (-21.3\% vs -68.4\%; median daily drug dose: 1000 mg vs 4 mg). This tendency persisted at T2 (-37.3\% vs -50.1\%; median drug dose: 1250 mg vs 6 mg) while at T3 a decrease in UFC from T0 was more pronounced in the metyrapone group (-71.5\% vs -51.5\%; median dose 1250 mg vs 7 mg). Under osilodrostat, a QTc-interval prolongation was identified at T3 (mean 432 ms vs 455 ms). From T0 to T2, the number of antihypertensive drugs remained comparable under metyrapone and decreased under osilodrostat (n= -0.3 vs n= -1.0). Conclusion Although both drugs show comparable therapeutic efficacy, osilodrostat seems to reduce cortisol levels and to control blood pressure faster.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TamburelloAltieriSbieraetal.2022,
  author    = {Tamburello, Mariangela and Altieri, Barbara and Sbiera, Iuliu and Sigala, Sandra and Berruti, Alfredo and Fassnacht, Martin and Sbiera, Silviu},
  title     = {FGF/FGFR signaling in adrenocortical development and tumorigenesis: novel potential therapeutic targets in adrenocortical carcinoma},
  series = {Endocrine},
  volume    = {77},
  journal   = {Endocrine},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1007/s12020-022-03074-z},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324420},
  pages     = {411-418},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {FGF/FGFR signaling regulates embryogenesis, angiogenesis, tissue homeostasis and wound repair by modulating proliferation, differentiation, survival, migration and metabolism of target cells. Understandably, compelling evidence for deregulated FGF signaling in the development and progression of different types of tumors continue to emerge and FGFR inhibitors arise as potential targeted therapeutic agents, particularly in tumors harboring aberrant FGFR signaling. There is first evidence of a dual role of the FGF/FGFR system in both organogenesis and tumorigenesis, of which this review aims to provide an overview. FGF-1 and FGF-2 are expressed in the adrenal cortex and are the most powerful mitogens for adrenocortical cells. Physiologically, they are involved in development and maintenance of the adrenal gland and bind to a family of four tyrosine kinase receptors, among which FGFR1 and FGFR4 are the most strongly expressed in the adrenal cortex. The repeatedly proven overexpression of these two FGFRs also in adrenocortical cancer is thus likely a sign of their participation in proliferation and vascularization, though the exact downstream mechanisms are not yet elucidated. Thus, FGFRs potentially offer novel therapeutic targets also for adrenocortical carcinoma, a type of cancer resistant to conventional antimitotic agents.},
  language  = {en}
}