@article{SeegersZabelGrueteretal.2015, author = {Seegers, Joachim and Zabel, Markus and Gr{\"u}ter, Timo and Ammermann, Antje and Weber-Kr{\"u}ger, Mark and Edelmann, Frank and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Binder, Lutz and Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph and Gr{\"o}schel, Klaus and Hasenfuß, Gerd and Feltgen, Nicolas and Pieske, Burkert and Wachter, Rolf}, title = {Natriuretic peptides for the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation}, series = {Open Heart}, volume = {2}, journal = {Open Heart}, number = {e000182}, doi = {10.1136/openhrt-2014-000182}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-149939}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background and purpose: Silent atrial fibrillation (AF) and tachycardia (AT) are considered precursors of ischaemic stroke. Therefore, detection of paroxysmal atrial rhythm disorders is highly relevant, but is clinically challenging. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of natriuretic peptide levels in the detection of paroxysmal AT/AF in a pilot study. Methods: Natriuretic peptide levels were analysed in two independent patient cohorts (162 patients with arterial hypertension or other cardiovascular risk factors and 82 patients with retinal vessel disease). N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and BNP were measured before the start of a 7-day Holter monitoring period carefully screened for AT/AF. Results: 244 patients were included; 16 had paroxysmal AT/AF. After excluding patients with a history of AT/AF (n=5), 14 patients had newly diagnosed AT/AF (5.8\%) NT-proBNP and BNP levels were higher in patients with paroxysmal AT/AF in both cohorts: (1) 154.4 (IQR 41.7; 303.6) versus 52.8 (30.4; 178.0) pg/mL and 70.0 (31.9; 142.4) versus 43.9 (16.3; 95.2) and (2) 216.9 (201.4; 277.1) versus 90.8 (42.3-141.7) and 96.0 (54.7; 108.2) versus 29.1 (12.0; 58.1). For the detection of AT/AF episodes, NT-proBNP and BNP had an area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic analysis of 0.76 (95\% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; p=0.002) and 0.75 (0.61 to 0.89; p=0.004), respectively. Conclusions: NT-proBNP and BNP levels are elevated in patients with silent AT/AF as compared with sinus rhythm. Thus, screening for undiagnosed paroxysmal AF using natriuretic peptide level initiated Holter monitoring may be a useful strategy in prevention of stroke or systemic embolism.}, language = {en} } @article{JobsVontheinKoenigetal.2020, author = {Jobs, Alexander and Vonthein, Reinhard and K{\"o}nig, Inke R. and Sch{\"a}fer, Jane and Nauck, Matthias and Haag, Svenja and Fichera, Carlo Federico and Stiermaier, Thomas and Ledwoch, Jakob and Schneider, Alisa and Valentova, Miroslava and von Haehling, Stephan and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Westermann, Dirk and Lenz, Tobias and Arnold, Natalie and Edelmann, Frank and Seppelt, Philipp and Felix, Stephan and Lutz, Matthias and Hedwig, Felix and Borggrefe, Martin and Scherer, Clemens and Desch, Steffen and Thiele, Holger}, title = {Inferior vena cava ultrasound in acute decompensated heart failure: design rationale of the CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 trial}, series = {ESC Heart Failure}, volume = {7}, journal = {ESC Heart Failure}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1002/ehf2.12598}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-212692}, pages = {973 -- 983}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Aims Treating patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) presenting with volume overload is a common task. However, optimal guidance of decongesting therapy and treatment targets are not well defined. The inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and its collapsibility can be used to estimate right atrial pressure, which is a measure of right-sided haemodynamic congestion. The CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 trial is designed to test the hypothesis that ultrasound assessment of the IVC in addition to clinical assessment improves decongestion as compared with clinical assessment alone. Methods and results CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 is a randomized, controlled, patient-blinded, multicentre, parallel-group trial randomly assigning 388 patients with ADHF to either decongesting therapy guided by ultrasound assessment of the IVC in addition to clinical assessment or clinical assessment alone. IVC ultrasound will be performed daily between baseline and hospital discharge in all patients. However, ultrasound results will only be reported to treating physicians in the intervention group. Treatment target is relief of congestion-related signs and symptoms in both groups with the additional goal to reduce the IVC diameter ≤21 mm and increase IVC collapsibility >50\% in the intervention group. The primary endpoint is change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide from baseline to hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints evaluate feasibility, efficacy of decongestion on other scales, and the impact of the intervention on clinical endpoints. Conclusions CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 will investigate whether IVC ultrasound supplementing clinical assessment improves decongestion in patients admitted for ADHF.}, language = {en} } @article{GerhardtKordsmeyerSehneretal.2023, author = {Gerhardt, Louisa M. S. and Kordsmeyer, Maren and Sehner, Susanne and G{\"u}der, G{\"u}lmisal and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Edelmann, Frank and Wachter, Rolf and Pankuweit, Sabine and Prettin, Christiane and Ertl, Georg and Wanner, Christoph and Angermann, Christiane E.}, title = {Prevalence and prognostic impact of chronic kidney disease and anaemia across ACC/AHA precursor and symptomatic heart failure stages}, series = {Clinical Research in Cardiology}, volume = {112}, journal = {Clinical Research in Cardiology}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1007/s00392-022-02027-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323990}, pages = {868-879}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Background The importance of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia has not been comprehensively studied in asymptomatic patients at risk for heart failure (HF) versus those with symptomatic HF. We analysed the prevalence, characteristics and prognostic impact of both conditions across American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) precursor and HF stages A-D. Methods and results 2496 participants from three non-pharmacological German Competence Network HF studies were categorized by ACC/AHA stage; stage C patients were subdivided into C1 and C2 (corresponding to NYHA classes I/II and III, respectively). Overall, patient distribution was 8.1\%/35.3\%/32.9\% and 23.7\% in ACC/AHA stages A/B/C1 and C2/D, respectively. These subgroups were stratified by the absence ( - ) or presence ( +) of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) and anaemia (haemoglobin in women/men < 12/ < 13 g/dL). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up. Prevalence increased across stages A/B/C1 and C2/D (CKD: 22.3\%/23.6\%/31.6\%/54.7\%; anaemia: 3.0\%/7.9\%/21.7\%/33.2\%, respectively), with concordant decreases in median eGFR and haemoglobin (all p < 0.001). Across all stages, hazard ratios [95\% confidence intervals] for all-cause mortality were 2.1 [1.8-2.6] for CKD + , 1.7 [1.4-2.0] for anaemia, and 3.6 [2.9-4.6] for CKD + /anaemia + (all p < 0.001). Population attributable fractions (PAFs) for 5-year mortality related to CKD and/or anaemia were similar across stages A/B, C1 and C2/D (up to 33.4\%, 30.8\% and 34.7\%, respectively). Conclusions Prevalence and severity of CKD and anaemia increased across ACC/AHA stages. Both conditions were individually and additively associated with increased 5-year mortality risk, with similar PAFs in asymptomatic patients and those with symptomatic HF.}, language = {en} } @article{EdelmannWachterDuengenetal.2011, author = {Edelmann, Frank and Wachter, Rolf and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Richter, Annette and Stahrenberg, Raoul and Neumann, Till and L{\"u}ers, Claus and Angermann, Christiane E. and Mehrhof, Felix and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Pieske, Burkert}, title = {Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline}, series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology}, volume = {10}, journal = {Cardiovascular Diabetology}, number = {15}, doi = {10.1186/1475-2840-10-15}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140397}, pages = {1-8}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Background: To assess heart failure therapies in diabetic patients with preserved as compared to impaired systolic ventricular function. Methods: 3304 patients with heart failure from 9 different studies were included (mean age 63 +/- 14 years); out of these, 711 subjects had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>= 50\%) and 994 patients in the whole cohort suffered from diabetes. Results: The majority (>90\%) of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (SHF) and diabetes were treated with an ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or with beta-blockers. By contrast, patients with diabetes and preserved ejection fraction (HFNEF) were less likely to receive these substance classes (p < 0.001) and had a worse blood pressure control (p < 0.001). In comparison to patients without diabetes, the probability to receive these therapies was increased in diabetic HFNEF patients (p < 0.001), but not in diabetic SHF patients. Aldosterone receptor blockers were given more often to diabetic patients with reduced ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and the presence and severity of diabetes decreased the probability to receive this substance class, irrespective of renal function. Conclusions: Diabetic patients with HFNEF received less heart failure medication and showed a poorer control of blood pressure as compared to diabetic patients with SHF. SHF patients with diabetes were less likely to receive aldosterone receptor blocker therapy, irrespective of renal function.}, language = {en} } @article{EdelmannStahrenbergGelbrichetal.2011, author = {Edelmann, Frank and Stahrenberg, Raoul and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Durstewitz, Kathleen and Angermann, Christiane E. and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk and Scheffold, Thomas and Zugck, Christian and Maisch, Bernhard and Regitz-Zagrosek, Vera and Hasenfuß, Gerd and Pieske, Burkert M. and Wachter, Rolf}, title = {Contribution of comorbidities to functional impairment is higher in heart failure with preserved than with reduced ejection fraction}, series = {Clinical Research in Cardiology}, volume = {100}, journal = {Clinical Research in Cardiology}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1007/s00392-011-0305-4}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134354}, pages = {755-764}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Background Comorbidities negatively affect prognosis more strongly in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) than with reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction. Their comparative impact on physical impairment in HFpEF and HFrEF has not been evaluated so far. Methods and results The frequency of 12 comorbidities and their impact on NYHA class and SF-36 physical functioning score (SF-36 PF) were evaluated in 1,294 patients with HFpEF and 2,785 with HFrEF. HFpEF patients had lower NYHA class (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) and higher SF-36 PF score (54.4 ± 28.3 vs. 54.4 ± 27.7, p < 0.001). All comorbidities were significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent in HFrEF, except hypertension and obesity, which were more frequent in HFpEF (p < 0.001). Adjusting for age and gender, COPD, anemia, hyperuricemia, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes had a similar (p for interaction > 0.05) negative effect in both groups. Obesity, coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial occlusive disease exerted a significantly (p < 0.05) more adverse effect in HFpEF, while hypertension and hyperlipidemia were associated with fewer (p < 0.05) symptoms in HFrEF only. The total impact of comorbidities on NYHA (AUC for prediction of NYHA III/IV vs. I/II) and SF-36 PF (r 2) in multivariate analyses was approximately 1.5-fold higher in HFpEF, and also much stronger than the impact of a 10\% decrease in ejection fraction in HFrEF or a 5 mm decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in HFpEF. Conclusion The impact of comorbidities on physical impairment is higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF. This should be considered in the differential diagnosis and in the treatment of patients with HFpEF.}, language = {en} } @article{EdelmannMusialBrightGelbrichetal.2016, author = {Edelmann, Frank and Musial-Bright, Lindy and Gelbrich, Goetz and Trippel, Tobias and Radenovic, Sara and Wachter, Rolf and Inkrot, Simone and Loncar, Goran and Tahirovic, Elvis and Celic, Vera and Veskovic, Jovan and Zdravkovic, Marija and Lainscak, Mitja and Apostolović, Svetlana and Neskovic, Aleksandar N. and Pieske, Burkert and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk}, title = {Tolerability and feasibility of beta-blocker titration in HFpEF versus HFrEF: Insights from the CIBIS-ELD trial}, series = {JACC: Heart Failure}, volume = {4}, journal = {JACC: Heart Failure}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.008}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191022}, pages = {140-149}, year = {2016}, abstract = {OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the tolerability and feasibility of titration of 2 distinctly acting beta-blockers (BB) in elderly heart failure patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. BACKGROUND: Broad evidence supports the use of BB in HFrEF, whereas the evidence for beta blockade in HFpEF is uncertain. METHODS: In the CIBIS-ELD (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly) trial, patients >65 years of age with HFrEF (n = 626) or HFpEF (n = 250) were randomized to bisoprolol or carvedilol. Both BB were up-titrated to the target or maximum tolerated dose. Follow-up was performed after 12 weeks. HFrEF and HFpEF patients were compared regarding tolerability and clinical effects (heart rate, blood pressure, systolic and diastolic functions, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute-walk distance, quality of life, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: For both of the BBs, tolerability and daily dose at 12 weeks were similar. HFpEF patients demonstrated higher rates of dose escalation delays and treatment-related side effects. Similar HR reductions were observed in both groups (HFpEF: 6.6 beats/min; HFrEF: 6.9 beats/min, p = NS), whereas greater improvement in NYHA functional class was observed in HFrEF (HFpEF: 23\% vs. HFrEF: 34\%, p < 0.001). Mean E/e' and left atrial volume index did not change in either group, although E/A increased in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: BB tolerability was comparable between HFrEF and HFpEF. Relevant reductions of HR and blood pressure occurred in both groups. However, only HFrEF patients experienced considerable improvements in clinical parameters and Left ventricular function. Interestingly, beta-blockade had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function in either group. Long-term studies using modern diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are urgently needed to establish whether BB therapy exerts significant clinical benefit in HFpEF. (Comparison of Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in Elderly Heart Failure HF] Patients: A Randomised, Double-Blind Multicentre Study CIBIS-ELD]; ISRCTN34827306).}, language = {en} }