@article{LangeSteigerwaldMalzacheretal.2021,
  author    = {Lange, Florian and Steigerwald, Frank and Malzacher, Tobias and Brandt, Gregor Alexander and Odorfer, Thorsten Michael and Roothans, Jonas and Reich, Martin M. and Fricke, Patrick and Volkmann, Jens and Matthies, Cordula and Capetian, Philipp D.},
  title     = {Reduced Programming Time and Strong Symptom Control Even in Chronic Course Through Imaging-Based DBS Programming},
  series = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  issn      = {1664-2295},
  doi       = {10.3389/fneur.2021.785529},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-249634},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objectives: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming is based on clinical response testing. Our clinical pilot trial assessed the feasibility of image-guided programing using software depicting the lead location in a patient-specific anatomical model. Methods: Parkinson's disease patients with subthalamic nucleus-DBS were randomly assigned to standard clinical-based programming (CBP) or anatomical-based (imaging-guided) programming (ABP) in an 8-week crossover trial. Programming characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: In 10 patients, both programs led to similar motor symptom control (MDS-UPDRS III) after 4 weeks (medicationOFF/stimulationON; CPB: 18.27 ± 9.23; ABP: 18.37 ± 6.66). Stimulation settings were not significantly different, apart from higher frequency in the baseline program than CBP (p = 0.01) or ABP (p = 0.003). Time spent in a program was not significantly different (CBP: 86.1 ± 29.82\%, ABP: 88.6 ± 29.0\%). Programing time was significantly shorter (p = 0.039) with ABP (19.78 ± 5.86 min) than CBP (45.22 ± 18.32). Conclusion: Image-guided DBS programming in PD patients drastically reduces programming time without compromising symptom control and patient satisfaction in this small feasibility trial.},
  language  = {en}
}