@article{DannerKellerHaerteletal.2017,
  author    = {Danner, Nadja and Keller, Alexander and H{\"a}rtel, Stephan and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf},
  title     = {Honey bee foraging ecology: Season but not landscape diversity shapes the amount and diversity of collected pollen},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0183716},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170424},
  pages     = {e0183716},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The availability of pollen in agricultural landscapes is essential for the successful growth and reproduction of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.). The quantity and diversity of collected pollen can influence the growth and health of honey bee colonies, but little is known about the influence of landscape structure on pollen diet. In a field experiment, we rotated 16 honey bee colonies across 16 agricultural landscapes, used traps to collect samples of collected pollen and observed intra-colonial dance communication to gain information about foraging distances. DNA metabarcoding was applied to analyze mixed pollen samples. Neither the amount of collected pollen nor pollen diversity was related to landscape diversity. However, we found a strong seasonal variation in the amount and diversity of collected pollen in all sites independent of landscape diversity. The observed increase in foraging distances with decreasing landscape diversity suggests that honey bees compensated for lower landscape diversity by increasing their pollen foraging range in order to maintain pollen amount and diversity. Our results underscore the importance of a diverse pollen diet for honey bee colonies. Agri-environmental schemes aiming to support pollinators should focus on possible spatial and temporal gaps in pollen availability and diversity in agricultural landscapes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SteijvenSpaetheSteffanDewenteretal.2017,
  author    = {Steijven, Karin and Spaethe, Johannes and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and H{\"a}rtel, Stephan},
  title     = {Learning performance and brain structure of artificially-reared honey bees fed with different quantities of food},
  series = {PeerJ},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {PeerJ},
  number    = {e3858},
  doi       = {10.7717/peerj.3858},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170137},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background Artificial rearing of honey bee larvae is an established method which enables to fully standardize the rearing environment and to manipulate the supplied diet to the brood. However, there are no studies which compare learning performance or neuroanatomic differences of artificially-reared (in-lab) bees in comparison with their in-hive reared counterparts. Methods Here we tested how different quantities of food during larval development affect body size, brain morphology and learning ability of adult honey bees. We used in-lab rearing to be able to manipulate the total quantity of food consumed during larval development. After hatching, a subset of the bees was taken for which we made 3D reconstructions of the brains using confocal laser-scanning microscopy. Learning ability and memory formation of the remaining bees was tested in a differential olfactory conditioning experiment. Finally, we evaluated how bees reared with different quantities of artificial diet compared to in-hive reared bees. Results Thorax and head size of in-lab reared honey bees, when fed the standard diet of 160 µl or less, were slightly smaller than hive bees. The brain structure analyses showed that artificially reared bees had smaller mushroom body (MB) lateral calyces than their in-hive counterparts, independently of the quantity of food they received. However, they showed the same total brain size and the same associative learning ability as in-hive reared bees. In terms of mid-term memory, but not early long-term memory, they performed even better than the in-hive control. Discussion We have demonstrated that bees that are reared artificially (according to the Aupinel protocol) and kept in lab-conditions perform the same or even better than their in-hive sisters in an olfactory conditioning experiment even though their lateral calyces were consistently smaller at emergence. The applied combination of experimental manipulation during the larval phase plus subsequent behavioral and neuro-anatomic analyses is a powerful tool for basic and applied honey bee research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NuernbergerSteffanDewenterHaertel2017,
  author    = {N{\"u}rnberger, Fabian and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and H{\"a}rtel, Stephan},
  title     = {Combined effects of waggle dance communication and landscape heterogeneity on nectar and pollen uptake in honey bee colonies},
  series = {PeerJ},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {PeerJ},
  number    = {e3441},
  doi       = {10.7717/peerj.3441},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170813},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The instructive component of waggle dance communication has been shown to increase resource uptake of Apis mellifera colonies in highly heterogeneous resource environments, but an assessment of its relevance in temperate landscapes with different levels of resource heterogeneity is currently lacking. We hypothesized that the advertisement of resource locations via dance communication would be most relevant in highly heterogeneous landscapes with large spatial variation of floral resources. To test our hypothesis, we placed 24 Apis mellifera colonies with either disrupted or unimpaired instructive component of dance communication in eight Central European agricultural landscapes that differed in heterogeneity and resource availability. We monitored colony weight change and pollen harvest as measure of foraging success. Dance disruption did not significantly alter colony weight change, but decreased pollen harvest compared to the communicating colonies by 40\%. There was no general effect of resource availability on nectar or pollen foraging success, but the effect of landscape heterogeneity on nectar uptake was stronger when resource availability was high. In contrast to our hypothesis, the effects of disrupted bee communication on nectar and pollen foraging success were not stronger in landscapes with heterogeneous compared to homogenous resource environments. Our results indicate that in temperate regions intra-colonial communication of resource locations benefits pollen foraging more than nectar foraging, irrespective of landscape heterogeneity. We conclude that the so far largely unexplored role of dance communication in pollen foraging requires further consideration as pollen is a crucial resource for colony development and health.},
  language  = {en}
}