@article{HammHoeger2011,
  author    = {Hamm, Henning and H{\"o}ger, Peter H},
  title     = {Skin Tumors in Childhood},
  series = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International},
  number    = {20},
  doi       = {10.3238/arztebl.2011.0347},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-142402},
  pages     = {347-353},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background: Dermatologists, paediatricians, and general practitioners are often consulted by worried parents for the evaluation of a cutaneous tumor. Methods: Selective literature review. Results: Only 1-2\% of skin tumors excised in children turn out to be malignant when examined histologically. Warning signs of malignancy include rapid growth, firm consistency, diameter exceeding 3 cm, ulceration, a non-movable mass, and presence in the neonatal period. The more common malignant skin tumors in adults-basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma-are very rare in childhood. Congenital melanocytic nevi and sebaceous nevi bear a lower malignant potential than previously believed; nevertheless, their excision is often indicated. A Spitz nevus can mimic a melanoma both clinically and histologically. Some benign skin tumors of childhood tend to regress spontaneously within a few years but may cause complications at particular locations and when multiple. For infantile hemangiomas requiring systemic treatment because of imminent obstruction or ulceration, propranolol seems to have a far more favorable risk-benefit ratio than corticosteroids. Conclusion: Physicians need specialized knowledge in order to decide whether a skin tumor in a child should be excised, non-surgically treated, or further evaluated, or whether it can be safely left untreated because of the likelihood of spontaneous remission.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DuhrKennKickuthetal.2011,
  author    = {Duhr, Carolin D. and Kenn, Werner and Kickuth, Ralph and Kerscher, Alexander G. and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Hahn, Dietbert and Pelz, Joerg O. W.},
  title     = {Optimizing of preoperative computed tomography for diagnosis in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis},
  series = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology},
  number    = {171},
  doi       = {10.1186/1477-7819-9-171},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-138024},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background and Objective This study evaluates whether Computer Tomography is an effective procedure for preoperative staging of patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Method A sample of 37 patients was analyzed with contrast enhanced abdominal Computer Tomography, followed by surgical staging. All Computer Tomography scans were evaluated 3 times by 2 radiologists with one radiologist reviewing 2 times. The efficacy of Computer Tomography was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Correlations were analyzed by abdominopelvic region to assess results of the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) aggregating the 13 regions. Surgical findings were compared to radiological findings. Results Results indicate high correlations between the surgical and radiological Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Indices. Analyses of the intra-class correlation between the first and second reading of one radiologist suggest high intra-observer reliability. Correlations by abdominopelvic region show higher values in the upper and middle regions and relatively lower values in the lower regions and the small bowel (correlation coefficients range between 0.418 and 0.726, p < 0.010; sensitivities range between 50\% and 96\%; and specificities range between 62\% and 100\%). Conclusion Computer Tomography represents an effective procedure in the preoperative staging of patients with PC. However, results by abdominopelvic region show lower correlation, therefore suggest lower efficacy. These results are supported by analyses of sensitivity and accuracy by lesion size. This suggests that Computer Tomography is an effective procedure for pre-operative staging but less for determining a tumor's accurate extent.},
  language  = {en}
}