@article{GieselKratochwilSchlittenhardtetal.2021,
  author    = {Giesel, Frederik L. and Kratochwil, Clemens and Schlittenhardt, Joel and Dendl, Katharina and Eiber, Matthias and Staudinger, Fabian and Kessler, Lukas and Fendler, Wolfgang P. and Lindner, Thomas and Koerber, Stefan A. and Cardinale, Jens and Sennung, David and Roehrich, Manuel and Debus, Juergen and Sathekge, Mike and Haberkorn, Uwe and Calais, Jeremie and Serfling, Sebastian and Buck, Andreas L.},
  title     = {Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of biodistribution and tumor uptake of \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI and \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients},
  series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  number    = {13},
  issn      = {1619-7070},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00259-021-05307-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-307252},
  pages     = {4377-4385},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose FAPI ligands (fibroblast activation protein inhibitor), a novel class of radiotracers for PET/CT imaging, demonstrated in previous studies rapid and high tumor uptake. The purpose of this study is the head-to-head intra-individual comparison of \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI versus standard-of-care \(^{18}\)F-FDG in PET/CT in organ biodistribution and tumor uptake in patients with various cancers. Material and Methods This international retrospective multicenter analysis included PET/CT data from 71 patients from 6 centers who underwent both \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI and \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT within a median time interval of 10 days (range 1-89 days). Volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually drawn in normal organs and tumor lesions to quantify tracer uptake by SUVmax and SUVmean. Furthermore, tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were generated (SUVmax tumor/ SUVmax organ). Results A total of 71 patients were studied of, which 28 were female and 43 male (median age 60). In 41 of 71 patients, the primary tumor was present. Forty-three of 71 patients exhibited 162 metastatic lesions. \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI uptake in primary tumors and metastases was comparable to 18F-FDG in most cases. The SUVmax was significantly lower for \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI than \(^{18}\)F-FDG in background tissues such as the brain, oral mucosa, myocardium, blood pool, liver, pancreas, and colon. Thus, \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI TBRs were significantly higher than 18F-FDG TBRs in some sites, including liver and bone metastases. Conclusion Quantitative tumor uptake is comparable between \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI and \(^{18}\)F-FDG, but lower background uptake in most normal organs results in equal or higher TBRs for \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI. Thus, \(^{68}\)Ga-FAPI PET/CT may yield improved diagnostic information in various cancers and especially in tumor locations with high physiological \(^{18}\)F-FDG uptake.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LindnerGieselKratochwiletal.2021,
  author    = {Lindner, Thomas and Giesel, Frederik L. and Kratochwil, Clemens and Serfling, Sebastian E.},
  title     = {Radioligands Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {22},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13225744},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250121},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Simple Summary FAP-targeted radiotracers, recently introduced in cancer treatment, accumulate in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs). CAFs are present in tumor lesions but do not correspond to genuine cancer cells, although they behave in an abnormal and disease-promoting manner. One of their characteristic features, the expression of the surface protein FAP, can be utilized to discriminate between cancerous and healthy tissues. By the choice of an appropriate radionuclide, FAP-targeted tracers can be used for imaging or therapy in many cancer types. Therefore, the first successful application of FAP-targeted imaging has led to an enormous and growing interest in nuclear medicine and radiopharmacy. Abstract Targeting fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) has attracted significant attention in nuclear medicine. Since these cells are present in most cancerous tissues and FAP is rarely expressed in healthy tissues, anti-FAP tracers have a potential as pan-tumor agents. Compared to the standard tumor tracer [\(^{18}\)F]FDG, these tracers show better tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) in many indications. Unlike [\(^{18}\)F]FDG, FAP-targeted tracers do not require exhausting preparations, such as dietary restrictions on the part of the patient, and offer the possibility of radioligand therapy (RLT) in a theragnostic approach. Although a radiolabeled antibody was clinically investigated as early as the 1990s, the breakthrough event for FAP-targeting in nuclear medicine was the introduction and clinical application of the so-called FAPI-tracers in 2018. From then, the development and application of FAP-targeted tracers became hot topics for the radiopharmaceutical and nuclear medicine community, and attracted the interest of pharmaceutical companies. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the development of FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals and their application in nuclear medicine.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerDerlinLapaetal.2020,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Derlin, Thorsten and Lapa, Constantin and Sheikbahaei, Sara and Higuchi, Takahiro and Giesel, Frederik L. and Behr, Spencer and Drzezga, Alexander and Kimura, Hiroyuki and Buck, Andreas K. and Bengel, Frank M. and Pomper, Martin G. and Gorin, Michael A. and Rowe, Steven P.},
  title     = {\(^{18}\)F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {1838-7640},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.37894},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202559},
  pages     = {1-16},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging for prostate cancer with \(^{68}\)Ga-labeled compounds has rapidly become adopted as part of routine clinical care in many parts of the world. However, recent years have witnessed the start of a shift from \(^{68}\)Ga- to \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted compounds. The latter imaging agents have several key advantages, which may lay the groundwork for an even more widespread adoption into the clinic. First, facilitated delivery from distant suppliers expands the availability of PET radiopharmaceuticals in smaller hospitals operating a PET center but lacking the patient volume to justify an onsite \(^{68}\)Ge/\(^{68}\)Ga generator. Thus, such an approach meets the increasing demand for PSMA-targeted PET imaging in areas with lower population density and may even lead to cost-savings compared to in-house production. Moreover, \(^{18}\)F-labeled radiotracers have a higher positron yield and lower positron energy, which in turn decreases image noise, improves contrast resolution, and maximizes the likelihood of detecting subtle lesions. In addition, the longer half-life of 110 min allows for improved delayed imaging protocols and flexibility in study design, which may further increase diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, such compounds can be distributed to sites which are not allowed to produce radiotracers on-site due to regulatory issues or to centers without access to a cyclotron. In light of these advantageous characteristics, \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted PET radiotracers may play an important role in both optimizing this transformative imaging modality and making it widely available. We have aimed to provide a concise overview of emerging \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted radiotracers undergoing active clinical development. Given the wide array of available radiotracers, comparative studies are needed to firmly establish the role of the available \(^{18}\)F-labeled compounds in the field of molecular PCa imaging, preferably in different clinical scenarios.},
  language  = {en}
}