@phdthesis{Wirth2017,
  author    = {Wirth, Robert},
  title     = {Consequences of bending and breaking the rules},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-155075},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Social life is organized around rules and norms. The present experiments investigate the cognitive architecture of rule violations. To do so, a setting with arbitrary rules that had to be followed or broken was developed, and breaking these rules did not have any negative consequences. Removed from any social influences that might further encourage or hinder the rule breaker, results suggest that simply labeling a behavior as a rule violation comes with specific costs: They are more difficult to plan and come with specific behavioral markers during execution. In essence, rule violations resemble rule negations, but they also trigger additional processes. The question of what makes rule violations more difficult than rule inversions is the major focus of the remaining experiments. These experiments revealed negative affective consequences of rule violation and rule inversions alike, while rule violations additionally prime authority-related concepts, thus sensitizing towards authority related stimuli. Next, the question how these burdens of non-conformity can be mitigated was investigated, and the influence of having executed the behavior in question frequently and recently was tested in both negations and rule violations. The burdens of non-conformity can best be reduced by a combination of having violated/negated a rule very frequently and very recently. Transfer from another task, however, could not be identified. To conclude, a model that accounts for the data that is currently presented is proposed. As a variant of a task switching model, it describes the cognitive processes that were investigated and highlights unique processing steps that rule violations seem to require.},
  subject      = {Soziale Norm},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PfisterSchwarzWirthetal.2017,
  author    = {Pfister, Roland and Schwarz, Katharina A. and Wirth, Robert and Lindner, Isabel},
  title     = {My Command, My Act: Observation Inflation in Face-To-Face Interactions},
  series = {Advances in Cognitive Psychology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Advances in Cognitive Psychology},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.5709/acp-0216-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170739},
  pages     = {166-176},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {When observing another agent performing simple actions, these actions are systematically remembered as one's own after a brief period of time. Such observation inflation has been documented as a robust phenomenon in studies in which participants passively observed videotaped actions. Whether observation inflation also holds for direct, face-to-face interactions is an open question that we addressed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants commanded the experimenter to carry out certain actions, and they indeed reported false memories of self-performance in a later memory test. The effect size of this inflation effect was similar to passive observation as confirmed by Experiment 2. These findings suggest that observation inflation might affect action memory in a broad range of real-world interactions.},
  language  = {en}
}