@article{UllmannSchmidtHieberBertzetal.2016,
  author    = {Ullmann, Andrew J. and Schmidt-Hieber, Martin and Bertz, Hartmut and Heinz, Werner J. and Kiehl, Michael and Kr{\"u}ger, William and Mousset, Sabine and Neuburger, Stefan and Neumann, Silke and Penack, Olaf and Silling, Gerda and Vehreschild, J{\"o}rg Janne and Einsele, Hermann and Maschmeyer, Georg},
  title     = {Infectious diseases in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prevention and prophylaxis strategy guidelines 2016},
  series = {Annals of Hematology},
  volume    = {95},
  journal   = {Annals of Hematology},
  number    = {9},
  organization    = {Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (AGIHO/DGHO) and the DAG-KBT (German Working Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation)},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00277-016-2711-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187587},
  pages     = {1435-1455},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Infectious complications after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remain a clinical challenge. This is a guideline provided by the AGIHO (Infectious Diseases Working Group) of the DGHO (German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology). A core group of experts prepared a preliminary guideline, which was discussed, reviewed, and approved by the entire working group. The guideline provides clinical recommendations for the preventive management including prophylactic treatment of viral, bacterial, parasitic, and fungal diseases. The guideline focuses on antimicrobial agents but includes recommendations on the use of vaccinations. This is the updated version of the AGHIO guideline in the field of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation utilizing methods according to evidence-based medicine criteria.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BochSpiessHeinzetal.2019,
  author    = {Boch, Tobias and Spiess, Birgit and Heinz, Werner and Cornely, Oliver A. and Schwerdtfeger, Rainer and Hahn, Joachim and Krause, Stefan W. and Duerken, Matthias and Bertz, Hartmut and Reuter, Stefan and Kiehl, Michael and Claus, Bernd and Deckert, Peter Markus and Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten and Buchheidt, Dieter and Reinwald, Mark},
  title     = {Aspergillus specific nested PCR from the site of infection is superior to testing concurrent blood samples in immunocompromised patients with suspected invasive aspergillosis},
  series = {Mycoses},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Mycoses},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1111/myc.12983},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214065},
  pages     = {1035 -- 1042},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a severe complication in immunocompromised patients. Early diagnosis is crucial to decrease its high mortality, yet the diagnostic gold standard (histopathology and culture) is time-consuming and cannot offer early confirmation of IA. Detection of IA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) shows promising potential. Various studies have analysed its diagnostic performance in different clinical settings, especially addressing optimal specimen selection. However, direct comparison of different types of specimens in individual patients though essential, is rarely reported. We systematically assessed the diagnostic performance of an Aspergillus-specific nested PCR by investigating specimens from the site of infection and comparing it with concurrent blood samples in individual patients (pts) with IA. In a retrospective multicenter analysis PCR was performed on clinical specimens (n = 138) of immunocompromised high-risk pts (n = 133) from the site of infection together with concurrent blood samples. 38 pts were classified as proven/probable, 67 as possible and 28 as no IA according to 2008 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group consensus definitions. A considerably superior performance of PCR from the site of infection was observed particularly in pts during antifungal prophylaxis (AFP)/antifungal therapy (AFT). Besides a specificity of 85\%, sensitivity varied markedly in BAL (64\%), CSF (100\%), tissue samples (67\%) as opposed to concurrent blood samples (8\%). Our results further emphasise the need for investigating clinical samples from the site of infection in case of suspected IA to further establish or rule out the diagnosis.},
  language  = {en}
}