@phdthesis{Solvie2023,
  author    = {Solvie, Daniel Alexander},
  title     = {Molecular Mechanisms of MYC as Stress Resilience Factor},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-30539},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-305398},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The underlying tumorigenesis is driven by the accumulation of alterations in the genome, eventually disabling tumor suppressors and activating proto-oncogenes. The MYC family of proto-oncogenes shows a strong deregulation in the majority of tumor entities. However, the exact mechanisms that contribute to MYC-driven oncogenesis remain largely unknown. Over the past decades, the influence of the MYC protein on transcription became increasingly apparent and was thoroughly investigated. Additionally, in recent years several publications provided evidence for so far unreported functions of MYC that are independent of a mere regulation of target genes. These findings suggest an additional role of MYC in the maintenance of genomic stability and this role is strengthened by key findings presented in this thesis. In the first part, I present data revealing a pathway that allows MYC to couple transcription elongation and DNA double-strand break repair, preventing genomic instability of MYC-driven tumor cells. This pathway is driven by a rapid transfer of the PAF1 complex from MYC onto RNAPII, a process that is mediated by HUWE1. The transfer controls MYC-dependent transcription elongation and, simultaneously, the remodeling of chromatin structure by ubiquitylation of histone H2B. These regions of open chromatin favor not only elongation but also DNA double-strand break repair. In the second part, I analyze the ability of MYC proteins to form multimeric structures in response to perturbation of transcription and replication. The process of multimerization is also referred to as phase transition. The observed multimeric structures are located proximal to stalled replication forks and recruit factors of the DNA-damage response and transcription termination machinery. Further, I identified the HUWE1-dependent ubiquitylation of MYC as an essential step in this phase transition. Cells lacking the ability to form multimers display genomic instability and ultimately undergo apoptosis in response to replication stress. Both mechanisms present MYC as a stress resilience factor under conditions that are characterized by a high level of transcriptional and replicational stress. This increased resilience ensures oncogenic proliferation. Therefore, targeting MYC's ability to limit genomic instability by uncoupling transcription elongation and DNA repair or disrupting its ability to multimerize presents a therapeutic window in MYC-dependent tumors.},
  subject      = {MYC},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Mannefeld2009,
  author    = {Mannefeld, Mirijam},
  title     = {Role of the human LIN complex in DNA damage induced regulation of gene expression},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-39261},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {In jeder menschlichen Zelle entstehen t{\"a}glich ca. 10.000 - 150.000 endogene DNA Sch{\"a}den. Eine Anh{\"a}ufung dieser L{\"a}sionen kann zu genetischer Instabilit{\"a}t f{\"u}hren und dadurch zur Krebsentwicklung beitragen. Daher ist eine schnelle DNA Schadensantwort n{\"o}tig, um schwerwiegende Folgen f{\"u}r die Zelle zu vermeiden. Da bekannt ist, dass der Multiproteinkomplex LINC (auch humaner dREAM-Komplex genannt) an der transkriptionellen Regulation mitotischer und G2-spezifischer Gene beteiligt ist, sollte in dieser Arbeit seine Beteiligung an der DNA Schadensantwort genauer untersucht werden. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird gezeigt, dass in normal wachsenden Zellen B-MYB an den LINC-Kernkomplex bindet, welcher sich aus 5 Proteinen zusammensetzt: LIN-9, LIN-54, LIN-52, LIN-37 und RbAp48. Treten DNA Sch{\"a}den auf, dissoziiert B-MYB vom LINC Kernkomplex wobei gleichzeitig die Bindung von p130 und E2F4 an LINC induziert wird. Zus{\"a}tzlich konnte gezeigt werden, dass der Signalweg, der die LINC Umlagerung vermittelt, sowohl p53- als auch p21-abh{\"a}ngig ist. p53 negative Zellen k{\"o}nnen nach Sch{\"a}digung der DNA weder einen G1 Block induzieren noch einen G2 Block langfristig aufrechterhalten. Eine Erkl{\"a}rung f{\"u}r diese Schw{\"a}chung des G2 Arrests liefern Daten dieser Arbeit: Da in DNA gesch{\"a}digten p53 -/- Zellen keine LINC Umlagerung beobachtet werden kann und zus{\"a}tzlich B-MYB verst{\"a}rkt an LINC und die Zielpromotoren bindet, kommt es zu einer erh{\"o}hten G2/M Genexpression. Dies resultiert h{\"a}ufig in einem verfr{\"u}hten Wiedereintritt in den Zellzyklus („checkpoint adaptation"). Eine Daten-Analyse prim{\"a}rer Brustkrebstumore zeigte außerdem, dass erh{\"o}hte B-MYB Genexpressionslevel mit einer erh{\"o}hte R{\"u}ckfallgefahr und einer schlechten Prognose korrelieren, was m{\"o}glicherweise auf die Funktion von B-MYB w{\"a}hrend der „checkpoint adaptation" zur{\"u}ckzuf{\"u}hren ist. Schlussendlich lassen die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit vermuten, dass die Hemmung der B-MYB Funktion in solchen Tumoren, die p53 Mutationen tragen, die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines Behandlungserfolges vergr{\"o}ßern und die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines R{\"u}ckfalls senken k{\"o}nnte.},
  subject      = {Zellzyklus},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Hofstetter2014,
  author    = {Hofstetter, Christine},
  title     = {Inhibition of H3K27me-Specific Demethylase Activity During Murine ES cell Differentiation Induces DNA Damage Response},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-107023},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Stem cells are defined by their capacity to self-renew and their potential to differentiate into multiple cell lineages. Pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells can renew indefinitely while keeping the potential to differentiate into any of the three germ layers (ectoderm, endoderm or mesoderm). For decades, ES cells are in the focus of research because of these unique features. When ES cells differentiate they form spheroid aggregates termed "embryoid bodies" (EBs). These EBs mimic post- implantation embryonic development and therefore facilitate the understanding of developmented mechanisms. During ES cell differentiation, de-repression or repression of genes accompanies the changes in chromatin structure. In ES cells, several mechanisms are involved in the regulation of the chromatin architecture, including post-translational modifications of histones. Post-translational histone methylation marks became one of the best- investigated epigenetic modifications, and they are essential for maintaining pluripotency. Until the first histone demethylase KDM1A was discovered in 2004 histone modifications were considered to be irreversible. Since then, a great number of histone demethylases have been identified. Their activity is linked to gene regulation as well as to stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. KDM6A and KDM6B are H3K27me3/2-specific histone demethylases, which are known to play a central role in the regulation of posterior development by regulating HOX gene expression. So far less is known about the molecular function of KDM6A or KDM6B in undifferentiated and differentiating ES cells. In order to completely abrogate KDM6A and KDM6B demethylase activity in undifferentiated and differentiating ES cells, a specific inhibitor (GSK-J4) was employed. Treatment with GSK-J4 had no effect on the viability or proliferation on ES cells. However, in the presence of GSK-J4 ES cell differentiation was completely abrogated with cells arrested in G1-phase and an increased rate of apoptosis. Global transcriptome analyses in early-differentiating ES cells revealed that only a limited set of genes were differentially regulated in response to GSK-J4 treatment with more genes up- regulated than down-regulated. Many of the up-regulated genes are linked to DNA damage response (DDR). In agreement with this, DNA damage was found in EBs incubated with GSK-J4. A co-localization of H3K27me3 or KDM6B with γH2AX foci, marking DNA breaks, could be excluded. However, differentiating Eed knockout (KO) ES cells, which are devoid of the H3K27me3 mark, showed an attenuated GSK-J4- induced DDR. Finally, hematopoietic differentiation in the presence of GSK-J4 resulted in a reduced colony-forming potential. This leads to the conclusion that differentiation in the presence of GSK-J4 is also restricted to hematopoietic differentiation. In conclusion, my results show that the enzymatic activity of KDM6A and KDM6B is not essential for maintaining the pluripotent state of ES cells. In contrast, the enzymatic activity of both proteins is indispensable for ES cell and hematopoietic differentiation. Additionally KDM6A and KDM6B enzymatic inhibition in differentiating ES cells leads to increased DNA damage with an activated DDR. Therefore, KDM6A and KDM6B are associated with DNA damage and in DDR in differentiating ES cells.},
  subject      = {Embryonale Stammzelle},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Brink2007,
  author    = {Brink, Andreas},
  title     = {The biological significance of chemically-induced DNA adducts in relation to background DNA damage},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-23850},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {DNS-Sch{\"a}digung},
  language  = {en}
}