@phdthesis{Maistrenko2021,
  author    = {Maistrenko, Oleksandr},
  title     = {Pangenome analysis of bacteria and its application in metagenomics},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-21499},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214996},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The biosphere harbors a large quantity and diversity of microbial organisms that can thrive in all environments. Estimates of the total number of microbial species reach up to 1012, of which less than 15,000 have been characterized to date. It has been challenging to delineate phenotypically, evolutionary and ecologically meaningful lineages such as for example, species, subspecies and strains. Even within recognized species, gene content can vary considerably between sublineages (for example strains), a problem that can be addressed by analyzing pangenomes, defined as the non-redundant set of genes within a phylogenetic clade, as evolutionary units. Species considered to be ecologically and evolutionary coherent units, however to date it is still not fully understood what are primary habitats and ecological niches of many prokaryotic species and how environmental preferences drive their genomic diversity. Majority of comparative genomics studies focused on a single prokaryotic species in context of clinical relevance and ecology. With accumulation of sequencing data due to genomics and metagenomics, it is now possible to investigate trends across many species, which will facilitate understanding of pangenome evolution, species and subspecies delineation. The major aims of this thesis were 1) to annotate habitat preferences of prokaryotic species and strains; 2) investigate to what extent these environmental preferences drive genomic diversity of prokaryotes and to what extent phylogenetic constraints limit this diversification; 3) explore natural nucleotide identity thresholds to delineate species in bacteria in metagenomics gene catalogs; 4) explore species delineation for applications in subspecies and strain delineation in metagenomics. The first part of the thesis describes methods to infer environmental preferences of microbial species. This data is a prerequisite for the analyses performed in the second part of the thesis which explores how the structure of bacterial pangenomes is predetermined by past evolutionary history and how is it linked to environmental preferences of the species. The main finding in this subchapter that habitat preferences explained up to 49\% of the variance for pangenome structure, compared to 18\% by phylogenetic inertia. In general, this trend indicates that phylogenetic inertia does not limit evolution of pangenome size and diversity, but that convergent evolution may overcome phylogenetic constraints. In this project we show that core genome size is associated with higher environmental ubiquity of species. It is likely this is due to the fact that species need to have more versatile genomes and most necessary genes need to be present in majority of genomes of that species to be highly prevalent. Taken together these findings may be useful for future predictive analyses of ecological niches in newly discovered species. The third part of the thesis explores data-driven, operational species boundaries. I show that homologous genes from the same species from different genomes tend to share at least 95\% of nucleotide identity, while different species within the same genus have lower nucleotide identity. This is in line with other studies showing that genome-wide natural species boundary might be in range of 90-95\% of nucleotide identity. Finally, the fourth part of the thesis discusses how challenges in species delineation are relevant for the identification of meaningful within-species groups, followed by a discussion on how advancements in species delineation can be applied for classification of within-species genomic diversity in the age of metagenomics.},
  subject      = {Pangenom},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Lapuente2021,
  author    = {Lapuente, Juan M.},
  title     = {The Chimpanzees of the Como{\´e} National Park, Ivory Coast. Status, distribution, ecology and behavior},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-22318},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-223180},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Although wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have been studied intensely for more than 50 years, there are still many aspects of their ecology and behavior that are not well understood. Every time that a new population of chimpanzees has been studied, new behaviors and unknown aspects of their ecology have been discovered. All this accumulated knowledge is helping us to piece together a model of how could last human and chimpanzee common ancestors have lived and behaved between seven and five million years ago. Como{\´e} chimpanzees had never been studied in depth, until we started our research in October 2014, only a few censuses had been realized. The last surveys prior our work, stated that the population was so decimated that was probably functionally extinct. When we started this research, we had to begin with a new intensive survey, using new methods, to ascertain the real status and distribution of the chimpanzees living in Como{\´e} National Park (CNP). During the last five years, we have realized a deep study aiming to know more about their ecology and behavior. We combined transects and reconnaissance marches (recces) with the use of camera traps, for the first time in CNP, obtaining a wealth of data that is not fully comprised in this dissertation. With this research, we determined that there is a sustainable continuous population of Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in CNP and the adjacent area of Mont Tingui, to the West, with a minimum of 127 weaned chimpanzees living in our main 900 km2 study area, SW of CNP. We found that this population is formed by a minimum of eight different chimpanzee communities, of which we studied seven, four of them more in detail. These chimpanzees spent much more time in the forest than in the savanna habitats. We also found that Como{\´e} chimpanzees consumed at least 58 different food items in their dit, which they obtained both from forest and savanna habitats. Another finding was that insectivory had an important role in their diet, with at least four species of ants, three of termites and some beetle larvae. These chimpanzees also hunted at least three species of monkeys and maybe rodents and duikers and occasionally consumed the big land snails of genus Achatina. We found that, during the fruit scarcity period in the late rainy season, they intensely consumed the cambium of Ceiba pentandra, as fallback food, much more than the bark or cambium of any other tree species. Another interesting finding was that all the chimpanzees in the studied area realized this particular bark-peeling behavior and had been repeatedly peeling the trees of this species for years. This did not increase tree mortality and the damage caused to the trees was healed in two years, not reducing the growth, thus being a sustainable use of the trees. We found that Como{\´e} chimpanzees produced and used a great variety of tools, mainly from wooden materials, but also from stone and herbaceous vegetation. Their tool repertory included stick tools to dip for Dorylus burmeisteri ants, to fish for Camponotus and Crematogaster ants, to dip for honey, mainly from Meliponini stingless bees, but sometimes from honey bees (Apis mellifera). It also included the use of stick tools to fish termites of Macrotermes subhyalinus and Odontotermes majus (TFTs), to dip for water from tree holes and investigatory probes for multiple purposes. Additionally, these chimpanzees used leaf-sponges to drink from tree holes and to collect clayish water from salt-licks. They also used stones to hit the buttresses of trees during displays, the so called accumulative stone throwing behavior and probably used stones as hammers, to crack open hard-shelled Strichnos spinosa and Afraegle paniculata fruits and Achatina snails. The chimpanzees also used objects that are not generally accepted as animal tools, for being attached to the substrate, with different purposes: they drummed buttresses of trees with hands and/or feet to produce sound during male displays and they pounded open hard-shelled fruits, Achatina snails and Cubitermes termite mounds on stone or root anvils. We finally measured the stick tools and found significant differences between them suggesting that they were specialized tools made specifically for every purpose. We studied more in detail the differences between apparently similar tools, the honey dipping tools and the water dipping tools, often with brushes made at their tips to collect the fluids. These last tools were exclusive from Como{\´e} and have not been described at any other site. We found that total length, diameter and brush length were significantly different, suggesting that they were specialized tools. We concluded that Como{\´e} chimpanzees had a particular culture, different from those of other populations of Western chimpanzees across Africa. Efficient protection, further research and permanent presence of research teams are required to avoid that this unique population and its culture disappears by the poaching pressure and maybe by the collateral effects of climate change.},
  subject      = {Parc National de la Como{\´e}},
  language  = {en}
}