@phdthesis{Stangler2015, author = {Stangler, Eva}, title = {Effects of habitat fragmentation on trap-nesting bees, wasps and their natural enemies in small secondary rainforest fragments in Costa Rica}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-108254}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Summary (English) I. Human induced global change threatens biodiversity and trophic interactions. Fragmentation is considered as one of the major threats to biodiversity and can cause reduced species richness, population declines, loss of genetic diversity and disruption of trophic interactions such as predation and parasitism. However forest fragmentation effects can be eclectic due to species specific traits. Specialist species with narrower niches or at higher trophic levels may be in danger of extinction whereas generalist species with less specific habitat requirements may even profit from fragmentation. In the tropics, known as "the" terrestrial biodiversity hotspots, even biodiversity inventories are often lacking, especially in forest canopies. Ongoing deforestation and resulting fragmentation in tropical regions are expected to heavily affect ecosystem functions by changes in biodiversity, community compositions and disruption of trophic interactions. It is even less unknown in what extent different global change drivers for example climate change and fragmentation interact. It is unlikely that deforestation will end, so that small secondary forest fragments will be important habitat elements that must be investigated to optimize their potential contribution to biodiversity conservation. This dissertation aimed to disentangle the effects of forest fragmentation on trap-nesting bee and wasp communities in small secondary forest fragments addressing the following main questions: 1) Are there interactive effects between microclimate and fragmentation on the abundance of bees and wasps, their mortality - and parasitism rates (Chapter II)? 2) How does fragmentation affect bee biodiversity from canopy to the understory with considerations of single species patterns (Chapter III)? 3) How is fragmentation affecting diversity and community composition of different trophic levels between understory and canopy with emphasis on the host-antagonist relation? (Chapter IV). II. A variety of global change drivers affect biodiversity and trophic interactions. The combined effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change are poorly understood and with ongoing deforestation and agricultural intensification secondary rainforest fragments might contribute to biodiversity conservation and mitigation of climate warming. This chapter investigated the interactive effects of habitat fragmentation and microclimate on the abundance and biotic interactions of trap-nesting bees and wasps in secondary forest fragments in the Northeastern lowlands of Costa Rica. Habitat area did not affect hymenopteran abundance, parasitism and mortality rates, but tree location- from the forest border to the forest center- influenced all variables. Interactive effects were found such as in the higher mortality rates at interior locations in larger fragments. Mean temperature at edge and interior locations led to significant effects on all tested variables and interactive effects between temperature and tree locations were found. Abundances at interior locations were significantly higher with increasing temperatures. Mortality rates at interior location increased at lower mean temperatures, whereas higher temperatures at edges marginally increased mortality rates. Our results indicate, that edge effects, mediated by altered microclimatic conditions, significantly change biotic interactions of trap-nesting hymenopterans in small secondary fragments. III. This chapter focusses on the vertical distribution of bees, their parasitism and mortality rates as well as single species patterns in relation to fragment size and edge effects in secondary rainforest remnants. No size effects on bee abundance, bee diversity and on parasitism- and mortality rates were found. Bees were least abundant at the intermediate height and were most abundant in the understory; whereas the highest diversity was found in the canopy. Tree location had no effect on bee abundance, but on bee diversity since most species were found in the forest interior. The cuckoo bees Aglaomelissa duckei and Coelioxys sp. 1 only partly followed the patterns of their hosts, two Centris species. Edge effects greatly influenced the bee community, so that the amount of edge habitat in secondary forest fragments will influence the conservation value for bees. IV. In this section the effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity, on community structure of hosts and natural enemies as well as the relation of hosts and antagonists were investigated from the understory to the canopy. The results stress the importance to monitor biodiversity, community composition and trophic interactions from the understory to the canopy. The higher trophic level of the antagonists was found to be more sensitive to fragment size compared to their hosts. Again edge effects were found to be the dominant driver since both host and antagonist richness, as well as community compositions were strongly affected. Ongoing fragmentation and increased amount of edge habitat could favor few abundant disturbance-adapted species over the rare and more diverse forest-adapted species. A positive-density dependent parasitism rate was demonstrated, as well as an increase of the parasitism rate not only with antagonist abundance but also diversity. Small secondary forest fragments surely can contribute to the conservation of biodiversity and trophic interactions, but increase of edge habitat will have negative consequences on above-ground nesting Hymenoptera, so that important interactions such as pollination, predation and parasitism could be disrupted. Therefore small forest fragments could contribute to biodiversity conservation but will not be able to compensate for the loss of large areas of primary forests. V. This dissertation contributes to the understanding of habitat area - and edge effects as well as the interaction of those with microclimatic conditions in small secondary rainforest fragments. As study system trap nests inhabited by solitary above-ground nesting bees, wasps and their natural enemies were chosen because they allow to study trophic interactions along their whole vertical distribution from the understory to the canopy. The effect of fragment size was rather weak, however, larger sizes affected the diversity of natural enemies positively, proofing the hypothesis that higher trophic levels react more sensitive to habitat loss. Edge effects heavily affected the abundance, diversity and community composition of hosts and their natural enemies as well as parasitism and mortality rates. Increased edge conditions resulting from ongoing fragmentation and deforestation will therefore negatively affect bees, wasps and their trophic interactions with natural enemies. Those changes affect important processes such as pollination, predation and parasitism, which could result in changes of ecosystem functioning. This study showed the importance to include all strata in biodiversity monitoring since height did matter for the trap-nesting communities. Diversity was shown to be higher in the canopy and community composition did change significantly. To conclude we could show that secondary forest fragments can sustain a trap-nesting bee and wasp community, but the amount of interior habitat is highly important for the conservation of forest-adapted species. Probably the conservation of large primary forest in combination with a high habitat connectivity, for example with small secondary forest fragments, will help to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem functioning better than the mere presence of small forest fragments.}, subject = {Costa Rica}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Steckel2013, author = {Steckel, Juliane}, title = {Effects of landscape heterogeneity and land use on interacting groups of solitary bees, wasps and their flying and ground-dwelling antagonists}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87900}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Die Heterogenit{\"a}t unserer heutigen Landschaften und Habitate ist gepr{\"a}gt und von jahrzehntelanger Landnutzungsintensivierung. Die daraus hervorgegangene Verarmung von weitr{\"a}umigen Arealen f{\"u}hrte zu einer zeitlich und r{\"a}umlich stark eingeschr{\"a}nkten Verf{\"u}gbarkeit von Nistm{\"o}glichkeiten und Nahrungsressourcen f{\"u}r Wildbienen und Wespen. Die Folgen sich ver{\"a}ndernder Ressourcenverf{\"u}gbarkeit f{\"u}r Wildbienen und Wespen war und ist eine Gef{\"a}hrdung der Artenvielfalt und der {\"O}kosystemprozesse, die diese Arten in Gang halten. Konsequenzen f{\"u}r diese wichtigen Best{\"a}uber und Pr{\"a}datoren sind kaum erforscht, genauso wenig wie f{\"u}r ihre Gegenspieler als nat{\"u}rliche Top-Down-Regulatoren. Nisthilfen f{\"u}r Wildbienen, Wespen und ihre nat{\"u}rlichen Gegenspieler eignen sich hervorragend um diese Wissensl{\"u}cken zu f{\"u}llen, da sie wertvolle Einblicke gew{\"a}hren in ansonsten verborgene trophische Interaktionen, wie Parasitierung und Pr{\"a}dation, aber auch in {\"O}kosystemprozesse wie Best{\"a}ubung und Reproduktion. Somit stellten wir uns in Kapitel II zun{\"a}chst die Frage, wie die Abundanz von st{\"a}ngelnistenden Bienen und Wespen im Gr{\"u}nland von dessen Bewirtschaftung abh{\"a}ngt. Außerdem untersuchten wir, wie Landnutzung die Effektivit{\"a}t der Top-Down-Regulation von Wildbienen und Wespen durch zwei verschiedene Gruppen von Gegenspielern beeinflusst. Dazu haben wir einer der beiden Gruppen, den bodenlebenden Gegenspielern, den Zugang zu den Nisthilfen vorenthalten. In einer großangelegten Feldstudie, die sich {\"u}ber drei verschiedene Regionen Deutschlands erstreckte, installierten wir 760 Nisthilfen auf 95 Gr{\"u}nlandfl{\"a}chen. Der Versuchsplan beinhaltete gem{\"a}hte und nicht gem{\"a}hte Versuchsplots, sowie Plots mit und ohne Ausschluss von Bodenpr{\"a}datoren. Wildbienen und Wespen besiedelten die Nisthilfen unabh{\"a}ngig davon, ob Bodenpr{\"a}datoren nun Zugang zu den Nisthilfen hatten oder nicht. Allerdings erh{\"o}hte sich die Rate der von fliegenden Gegenspielern gefressenen und parasitierten Brutzellen (Fressrate) sobald bodenlebende Gegenspieler ausgeschlossen wurden. Diese Fressrate war vom experimentellen M{\"a}hen unabh{\"a}ngig. Jedoch wiesen ungem{\"a}hte Versuchsplots marginal signifikant mehr Brutzellen von Wespen auf. Beide Manipulationen, das M{\"a}hen und der Pr{\"a}datorausschluss, interagierten signifikant. So wurden auf gem{\"a}hten Plots, auf denen Bodenpr{\"a}datoren ausgeschlossen waren, h{\"o}here Fressraten der fliegenden Gegenspieler beobachtet, w{\"a}hrend dieser Effekt auf der ungem{\"a}hten Plots ausblieb. Das Thema in Kapitel III ist der relative Einfluss lokaler Gr{\"u}nlandnutzung, Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t und Landschaftsstruktur auf Artenvielfalt und -abundanz von Wildbienen, Wespen und ihrer fliegenden Gegenspieler. Dazu kartierten wir Landnutzungstypen innerhalb konzentrischer Kreise um die Versuchsplots. Mithilfe der digitalisierten Landschaftsdaten berechneten wir Indices als Maße f{\"u}r Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t und -struktur f{\"u}r acht Radien bis 2000 m. Der negative Effekt lokaler Landnutzung auf die Wirtsabundanz war nur marginal signifikant. Jedoch stellten wir einen positiven Effekt der Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t innerhalb kleiner Radien auf die Artenvielfalt und -abundanz der Wirte fest. Die fliegenden Gegenspieler allerdings profitierten von einer komplexen Landschaftsstruktur innerhalb großer Radien. Die letzte Studie, vorgestellt in Kapitel IV, behandelt die Bedeutung von Ressourcenverf{\"u}gbarkeit f{\"u}r die Dauer von Fouragierfl{\"u}gen und die sich daraus ergebenen Konsequenzen f{\"u}r den Reproduktionserfolg der Roten Mauerbiene. Dazu beobachteten wir nistenden Bienen auf 18 Gr{\"u}nlandfl{\"a}chen in zwei der Untersuchungsregionen in Deuschland. Wir ermittelten die lokale Landnutzungsintensit{\"a}t, lokale Bl{\"u}tendeckung sowie Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t und -struktur als wichtige potentielle Einflussfaktoren. Jede Gr{\"u}nlandfl{\"a}che wurde mit acht Nisthilfen und 50 weiblichen Bienen ausgestattet. Verschiedene Nestbau-Aktivit{\"a}ten, wie Fouragierfl{\"u}ge f{\"u}r Pollen und Nektar, wurden aufgenommen. Wir stellten fest, dass Fouragierfl{\"u}ge f{\"u}r Pollen und Nektar in komplexen, strukturreichen Landschaften signifikant k{\"u}rzer waren, dass jedoch weder lokale Faktoren, noch Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t eine Rolle spielten. Wir konnten keinen Zusammenhang zwischen der Dauer von Fouragierfl{\"u}gen und Reproduktionserfolg feststellen. Um eine r{\"a}umlich und zeitlich konstante Versorgung von Nahrungs- und Nistressourcen zu gew{\"a}hrleisten und damit biotische Interaktionen, Diversit{\"a}t und Besiedlungserfolg von Wildbienen, Wespen und ihrer Gegenspieler zu unterst{\"u}tzen, empfehlen wir Maßnahmen, die sowohl die lokale Landnutzung als auch unterschiedliche Landschaftsfaktoren ber{\"u}cksichtigen.}, subject = {Wildbienen}, language = {en} }