@phdthesis{Duque2022,
  author    = {Duque, Laura Maria Ribeiro},
  title     = {Effects of ozone on plants and plant-insect interactions},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-27798},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-277983},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Anthropogenic activities are causing air pollution. Amongst air pollutants, tropospheric ozone is a major threat to human health and ecosystem functioning. In this dissertation, I present three studies that aimed at increasing our knowledge on how plant exposure to ozone affects its reproduction and its interactions with insect herbivores and pollinators. For this purpose, a new fumigation system was built and placed in a greenhouse. The annual plant Sinapis arvensis (wild mustard) was used as the model plant. Plants were exposed to either 0 ppb (control) or 120 ppb of ozone, for variable amounts of time and at different points of their life cycle. After fumigation, plants were exposed to herbivores or pollinators in the greenhouse, or to both groups of insects in the field. My research shows that ozone affected reproductive performance differently, depending on the timing of exposure: plants exposed at earlier ages had their reproductive fitness increased, while plants exposed later in their life cycle showed a tendency for reduced reproductive fitness. Plant phenology was a key factor influencing reproductive fitness: ozone accelerated flowering and increased the number of flowers produced by plants exposed at early ages, while plants exposed to ozone at later ages tended to have fewer flowers. On the other hand, the ozone-mediated changes in plant-insect interactions had little impact on plant reproductive success. The strongest effect of ozone on plant-pollinator interactions was the change in the number of flower visits received per plant, which was strongly linked to the number of open flowers. This means that, as a rule, exposure of plants to ozone early in the life cycle resulted in a higher number of pollinator visits, while exposure later in the life cycle resulted in fewer flower visits by potential pollinators. An exception was observed: the higher number of visits performed by large syrphid flies to young ozone-exposed plants than to the respective control plants went beyond the increase in the number of open flowers in those plants. Also, honeybees spent more time per flower in plants exposed to ozone than on control plants, while other pollinators spent similar amounts of time in control and ozone-exposed plants. This guild-dependent preference for ozone-exposed plants may be due to species-specific preferences related to changes in the quality and quantity of floral rewards. In the field, ozone-exposed plants showed only a tendency for increased colonization by sucking herbivores and slightly more damage by chewing herbivores than control plants. On the other hand, in the greenhouse experiment, Pieris brassicae butterflies preferred control plants over ozone-exposed plants as oviposition sites. Eggs laid on ozone-exposed plants took longer to hatch, but the chances of survival were higher. Caterpillars performed better in control plants than in ozone-exposed plants, particularly when the temperature was high. Most of the described effects were dependent on the duration and timing of the ozone exposure and the observed temperature, with the strongest effects being observed for longer exposures and higher temperatures. Furthermore, the timing of exposure altered the direction of the effects. The expected climate change provides ideal conditions for further increases in tropospheric ozone concentrations, therefore for stronger effects on plants and plant-insect interactions. Acceleration of flowering caused by plant exposure to ozone may put plant-pollinator interactions at risk by promoting desynchronization between plant and pollinator activities. Reduced performance of caterpillars feeding on ozone-exposed plants may weaken herbivore populations. On the other hand, the increased plant reproduction that results from exposing young plants to ozone may be a source of good news in the field of horticulture, when similar results would be achieved in high-value crops. However, plant response to ozone is highly species-specific. In fact, Sinapis arvensis is considered a weed and the advantage conferred by ozone exposure may increase its competitiveness, with negative consequences for crops or plant communities in general. Overall, plant exposure to ozone might constitute a threat for the balance of natural and agro-ecosystems.},
  subject      = {Plant},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VogelChungaSunetal.2021,
  author    = {Vogel, Cassandra and Chunga, Timothy L. and Sun, Xiaoxuan and Poveda, Katja and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf},
  title     = {Higher bee abundance, but not pest abundance, in landscapes with more agriculture on a late-flowering legume crop in tropical smallholder farms},
  series = {PeerJ},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PeerJ},
  doi       = {10.7717/peerj.10732},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231491},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background Landscape composition is known to affect both beneficial insect and pest communities on crop fields. Landscape composition therefore can impact ecosystem (dis)services provided by insects to crops. Though landscape effects on ecosystem service providers have been studied in large-scale agriculture in temperate regions, there is a lack of representation of tropical smallholder agriculture within this field of study, especially in sub-Sahara Africa. Legume crops can provide important food security and soil improvement benefits to vulnerable agriculturalists. However, legumes are dependent on pollinating insects, particularly bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) for production and are vulnerable to pests. We selected 10 pigeon pea (Fabaceae: Cajunus cajan (L.)) fields in Malawi with varying proportions of semi-natural habitat and agricultural area within a 1 km radius to study: (1) how the proportion of semi-natural habitat and agricultural area affects the abundance and richness of bees and abundance of florivorous blister beetles (Coleoptera: Melloidae), (2) if the proportion of flowers damaged and fruit set difference between open and bagged flowers are correlated with the proportion of semi-natural habitat or agricultural area and (3) if pigeon pea fruit set difference between open and bagged flowers in these landscapes was constrained by pest damage or improved by bee visitation. Methods We performed three, ten-minute, 15 m, transects per field to assess blister beetle abundance and bee abundance and richness. Bees were captured and identified to (morpho)species. We assessed the proportion of flowers damaged by beetles during the flowering period. We performed a pollinator and pest exclusion experiment on 15 plants per field to assess whether fruit set was pollinator limited or constrained by pests. Results In our study, bee abundance was higher in areas with proportionally more agricultural area surrounding the fields. This effect was mostly driven by an increase in honeybees. Bee richness and beetle abundances were not affected by landscape characteristics, nor was flower damage or fruit set difference between bagged and open flowers. We did not observe a positive effect of bee density or richness, nor a negative effect of florivory, on fruit set difference. Discussion In our study area, pigeon pea flowers relatively late—well into the dry season. This could explain why we observe higher densities of bees in areas dominated by agriculture rather than in areas with more semi-natural habitat where resources for bees during this time of the year are scarce. Therefore, late flowering legumes may be an important food resource for bees during a period of scarcity in the seasonal tropics. The differences in patterns between our study and those conducted in temperate regions highlight the need for landscape-scale studies in areas outside the temperate region.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Benadi2013,
  author    = {Benadi, Gita},
  title     = {Linking specialisation and stability of plant-pollinator networks},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85288},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {In this dissertation, I examine the relationship between specialisation and stability of plant-pollinator networks, with a focus on two issues: Diversity maintenance in animal-pollinated plant communities and robustness of plant-pollinator systems against disturbances such as those caused by anthropogenic climate change. Chapter 1 of this thesis provides a general introduction to the concepts of ecological stability and specialisation with a focus on plant-pollinator systems, and a brief outline of the following chapters. Chapters 2-5 each consist of a research article addressing a specific question. While chapters 2 and 3 deal with different aspects of diversity maintenance in animal-pollinated plant communities, chapters 4 and 5 are concerned with the consequences of climate change in the form of temporary disturbances caused by extreme climatic events (chapter 4) and shifts in phenology of plants and pollinators (chapter 5). From a methodological perspective, the first three articles (chapter 2-4) can be grouped together as they all employ mathematical models of plant-pollinator systems, whereas chapter 5 describes an empirical study of plant-pollinator interactions along an altitudinal gradient in the Alps. The final chapter (6) provides a review of current knowledge on each of the two main themes of this thesis and places the findings of the four research articles in the context of related studies.},
  subject      = {Theoretische {\"O}kologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Kindeketa2014,
  author    = {Kindeketa, William Joseph},
  title     = {Pollination in wild plant communities along altitudinal and land use gradients Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-100136},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {1. Pollination of sexually reproducing plants requires pollen transfer agents, which can be biotic, abiotic or a combination of biotic and abiotic agents. The dominance of one of pollination system in wild plant communities depends on climatic factors and/or degrees of anthropogenic influences, which have effects on pollinator diversity and pollination function. Anthropogenic activities and climate change are also considered as main causes of ongoing invasion of invasive species into wild and managed habitats which can bring up competition for pollinators with possible negative consequences for the reproduction of co-occurring native plant species. 2. The study aimed to determine pollination systems and pollination limitation of invasive and native plant communities in natural savannah between 870 - 1130 m and semi-natural (managed) grassland between 1300 - 1750 m above sea level; effects of flower density and pollinator abundance on seed production of cross-pollinated and self-pollinated plants; and relationships of bee abundance and the proportion of cross- pollinated plants at the southern slope of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. 3. Pollinator-exclusion, open pollination and supplemental hand-pollination treatments were applied to 27 plant species in savannah and grassland habitats. Flowers were counted in each clusters based upon their species. Pollinators were sampled by using pan traps. Information-theory-based multi-model averaging and generalized linear mixed effects models were used to identify and analyze the effects of flower density, pollinator abundance, pollination treatments and habitat types on seed production. Regression models were used to determine relationships of altitude with bee abundance, and with proportion of cross-pollinated plants. 4. My results show that mean seed numbers of native plants were significantly lower in pollinator-exclusion treatments than in open-pollination treatments, indicating their reliance on pollinators for reproductive success. In contrast, seed numbers of invasive plants were similar in pollinator-exclusion and open-pollination treatments, demonstrating an ability of reproduction without pollinators. Despite of higher levels of self-pollination in invasive plants, supplemental hand-pollination treatments revealed pollen limitation in grassland and marginally in savannah habitats. There were no significant difference in seed numbers between supplemental hand pollination and open pollination treatments of native plant communities in savannah and grassland, which indicates no pollination limitation in the studied ecological system for native communities. Besides, grassland plants produced comparatively more seeds than savannah plants, however seeds in grasslands were lighter than those of the savannah which may be due to nutrient limitation in grassland. 5. I found 12 cross-pollinated and 15 self-pollinated plants along altitudinal gradient after comparing seeds from pollinator-excluded and open-pollinated experiments. I also found that proportions of cross-pollinated plants and bee abundance simultaneously decreased with increasing altitude. All cross-pollinated plants were native and grew in savannah habitats, with an exception of one species. 6. Neither effects of focal flower density nor a significant interaction between focal flower densities and bee abundance for self-pollinated plants were observed. However, there were effects of focal flower densities and interactions of flower density with bee abundance for cross-pollinated plants. Non-focal flower density has no significant effects on seed production of cross-pollinated and self-pollinated plants. 7. The results show that native plants depend more on cross-pollination than invasive plants, despite of most native plants in managed habitat (grassland) rely on self-pollination for reproduction. The tendency of having more cross-pollinated plants in natural savannah which are in low altitude coincides with other finding that the cross-pollinated plants and bee abundance simultaneously decrease with increasing altitude. Therefore, our findings support the hypotheses that self-fertilization of flowering plants increases with increasing altitude, and pollinator limitation is most pronounced in managed or disturbed habitats. Despite of reduction of pollinators in grassland, only invasive plants experience pollen limitation, which may be due to poor integration with available pollinator networks. 8. I also found bee abundance and flower density are not the main pollination factors required by self-pollinated plants during reproduction. However, focal flower density, which influences pollinator diversity, is more applicable to cross-pollinated plants. Climate change and anthropogenic activities in natural habitats are factors that influence pollinator abundance and functioning, which lead to a shift of mating systems in plant communities so as to assure their reproduction.},
  subject      = {Best{\"a}ubungs{\"o}kologie},
  language  = {en}
}