@phdthesis{Ries2020,
  author    = {Ries, Lena Kerstin},
  title     = {From recognition to reaction: Mechanistic analysis of the interactions of the HECT ligase E6AP with ubiquitin},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-17960},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-179609},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The ubiquitination of proteins controls a multitude of physiological processes. This versatility of ubiquitin as a molecular signal arises from the diverse ways by which it can be attached to target proteins. Different ubiquitination patterns are then translated into different downstream consequences. Due to the enormous complexity of possible ubiquitin modifications, the ubiquitination machinery must be highly specific and tightly controlled. Ubiquitination proceeds through an enzymatic cascade, the last step of which is catalyzed by the E3 enzyme family. E3 enzymes are the crucial regulators since they dictate the specificity of substrate selection and modification. Deregulation of the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase E6AP (UBE3A) is implicated in human papilloma virus-induced cervical tumorigenesis and several neurodevelopmental disorders. Yet the structural underpinnings of activity, regulation and specificity in this crucial ligase are incompletely understood. One aim of this study was to unravel the role of the a1'-helix N-terminal to the HECT domain that was found to be a key element mediating regulation and oligomerization in other HECT ligases. I found that most N-terminally extended HECT domain constructs were insoluble when expressed in E. coli, indicating that additional regions N-terminal to the tested fragments may be essential to protect this highly hydrophobic helix from causing aggregation. Another question addressed in this study was how E6AP builds ubiquitin chains. Using single-turnover experiments, I showed that ubiquitin-loaded E6AP is unable to transfer an additional ubiquitin molecule onto a stably linked ubiquitin-E6AP complex. This indicates that E6AP cannot assemble chains on its active site and may instead follow a sequential addition mechanism in which one ubiquitin molecule is transferred at a time to the target protein. Using NMR spectroscopy and extensive mutational analyses, the determinants of ubiquitin recognition by the C-lobe of E6AP were unraveled and assigned to particular steps in the catalytic cycle. A functionally critical interface was identified that is specifically required during thioester formation between the C-terminus of ubiquitin and the ligase active site. This interface resembles the one utilized by NEDD4-type enzymes, suggesting a conserved ubiquitin binding mode across HECT ligases, independent of their linkage specificities. Moreover, I identified critical surface patches on ubiquitin and in the N- and C-terminal portions of the catalytic domain of E6AP that are important for the subsequent step of isopeptide bond formation. I also uncovered key determinants of the Lys48-linkage specificity of E6AP, both in the E6AP HECT domain and ubiquitin itself. This includes the C-terminal tail of E6AP and a hydrophilic surface region of ubiquitin in proximity to the acceptor site, Lys48. It is thus tempting to speculate that ubiquitin linkage formation by E6AP is substrate-assisted. Taken together, my results improve our mechanistic understanding of the structure-function relationship between E6AP and ubiquitin, thus providing a basis for ultimately manipulating the functions of this HECT ligase for therapeutic applications.},
  subject      = {Ubiquitin},
  language  = {en}
}