@article{KrieterJeyaseelanRuethetal.2021,
  author    = {Krieter, Detlef H. and Jeyaseelan, Jarline and R{\"u}th, Marieke and Lemke, Horst-Dieter and Wanner, Christoph and Drechsler, Christiane},
  title     = {Clinical hemocompatibility of double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis comparing polyethersulfone and ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer membranes},
  series = {Artificial Organs},
  volume    = {45},
  journal   = {Artificial Organs},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1111/aor.13944},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258307},
  pages     = {1104-1113},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Activation of the complement system and leukocytes by blood-membrane interactions may further promote arteriosclerosis typically present in patients on lipoprotein apheresis. As clinical data on the hemocompatibility of lipoprotein apheresis are scarce, a controlled clinical study comparing two different types of plasma separation and fractionation membranes used in double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis was urgently needed, as its outcome may influence clinical decision-making. In a prospective, randomized, crossover controlled trial, eight patients on double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis were subjected to one treatment with recent polyethersulfone (PES) plasma separation and fractionation membranes and one control treatment using a set of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVAL) membranes. White blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PC) counts, complement factor C5a and thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) concentrations were determined in samples drawn at defined times from different sites of the extracorporeal blood and plasma circuit. With a nadir at 25 minutes, WBCs in EVAL decreased to 33.5 ± 10.7\% of baseline compared with 63.8 ± 22.0\% at 20 minutes in PES (P < .001). The maximum C5a levels in venous blood reentering the patients were measured at 30 minutes, being 30.0 ± 11.2 µg/L with EVAL and 12.3 ± 9.0 µg/L with PES (P < .05). The highest C5a concentrations were found in plasma after the plasma filters (EVAL 56.1 ± 22.0 µg/L at 15 minutes vs PES 23.3 ± 15.2 µg/L at 10 minutes; P < .001). PC did not significantly decrease over time with both membrane types, whereas TAT levels did not rise until the end of the treatment without differences between membranes. Regarding lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol removal, both membrane sets performed equally. Compared with EVAL, PES membranes cause less leukocyte and complement system activation, the classical parameters of hemocompatibility of extracorporeal treatment procedures, at identical treatment efficacy. Better hemocompatibility may avoid inflammation-promoting effects through blood-material interactions in patients requiring double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Devine2013,
  author    = {Devine, Eric},
  title     = {Increased removal of protein bound uremic toxins through reversible modification of the ionic strength during hemodiafiltration},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-83583},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {A large number of metabolic waste products accumulate in the blood of patients with renal failure. Since these solutes have deleterious effects on the biological functions, they are called uremic toxins and have been classified in three groups: 1) small water soluble solutes (MW < 500 Da), 2) small solutes with known protein binding (MW < 500 Da), and 3) middle molecules (500 Da < MW < 60 kDa). Protein bound uremic toxins are poorly removed by conventional hemodialysis treatments because of their high protein binding and high distribution volume. The prototypical protein bound uremic toxins indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS) are associated with the progression of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality of patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Furthermore, these two compounds are bound to albumin, the main plasma protein, via electrostatic and/or Van-der-Waals forces. The aim of the present thesis was to develop a dialysis strategy, based on the reversible modification of the ionic strength in the blood stream by increasing the sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration, in order to enhance the removal of protein bound substances, such as IS and pCS, with the ultimate goal to improve clinical patient outcomes. Enhancing the NaCl concentration ([NaCl]) in both human normal and uremic plasma was efficient to reduce the protein bound fraction of both IS and pCS by reducing their binding affinity to albumin. Increasing the ionic strength was feasible during modified pre-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) by increasing the [NaCl] in the substitution fluid. The NaCl excess was adequately removed within the hemodialyzer. This method was effective to increase the removal rate of both protein bound uremic toxins. Its ex vivo hemocompatibility, however, was limited by the osmotic shock induced by the high [NaCl] in the substituate. Therefore, modified pre-dilution HDF was further iterated by introducing a second serial cartridge, named the serial dialyzers (SDial) setup. This setting was validated for feasibility, hemocompatibility, and toxin removal efficiency. A better hemocompatibility at similar efficacy was obtained with the SDial setup compared with the modified pre-dilution HDF. Both methods were finally tested in an animal sheep model of dialysis to verify biocompatibility. Low hemolysis and no activation of both the complement and the coagulation systems were observed when increasing the [NaCl] in blood up to 0.45 and 0.60 M with the modified pre-dilution HDF and the SDial setup, respectively. In conclusion, the two dialysis methods developed to transitory enhance the ionic strength in blood demonstrated adequate biocompatibility and improved the removal of protein bound uremic toxins by decreasing their protein bound fraction. The concepts require follow-on clinical trials to assess their in vivo efficacy and their impact on long-term clinical outcomes.},
  subject      = {H{\"a}modiafiltration},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Kirsch2007,
  author    = {Kirsch, Artur},
  title     = {Klinische Performance und Biokompatibilit{\"a}t der PUREMA® H-Dialysemembran},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-34717},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Im Rahmen einer randomisierten, prospektiven Cross-over-Studie wurden w{\"a}hrend der H{\"a}modialyse an chronisch dialysepflichtigen Patienten standardisiert Parameter der Dialyseeffektivit{\"a}t und Biokompatibilit{\"a}t einer neuen, mittels einem Polyelektrolytadditiv modifizierten Dialysemembran, PUREMA® H, im Vergleich zu einer Kontrolldialysemembran, Helixone®, gemessen. Im Vergleich zur Kontrollmembran wies die PUREMA® H-Membran eine verbesserte Entfernung kleinmolekulargewichtiger Eiweiße incl. \&\#61538;2-Mikroglobulin und eine insbesondere f{\"u}r die Komplementaktivierung optimierte Biokompatibilit{\"a}t auf.},
  subject      = {H{\"a}modialyse},
  language  = {de}
}