@article{StrobelSickenbergerSchoenetal.2022,
  author    = {Strobel, Katharina and Sickenberger, Christina and Schoen, Christoph and Kneitz, Hermann and Kolb-M{\"a}urer, Annette and Goebeler, Matthias},
  title     = {Diagnosis and therapy of Mycobacterium marinum: a single-center 21-year retrospective analysis},
  series = {Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1111/ddg.14847},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-318428},
  pages     = {1211 -- 1218},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background and Objectives In Europe, infections with Mycobacterium (M.) marinum are rare. We conducted a retrospective single-center study to assess the clinical spectrum of M. marinum infection and its diagnosis, treatment and outcome under real-world conditions. Patients and Methods Eighteen patients presenting with M. marinum infections between 1998 and 2018 were identified in the data warehouse of the University Hospital W{\"u}rzburg and considered for detailed analysis. Results Twelve patients reported aquatic exposure. In 16/18 cases the upper extremities were affected. No invasive infections were detected. Mean time to diagnosis was 15 weeks. Histology revealed granulomatous inflammation in 14 patients while mycobacterial cultures were positive for M. marinum in 16 cases. Most patients received antibiotic monotherapy (14/18) while combination therapy was administered in four cases. Treatment (with a median duration of 10 weeks) was successful in 13 patients. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusions Our retrospective analysis of M. marinum infections at a German tertiary referral center revealed a considerable diagnostic delay and the relevance of microbiological culture, PCR and histology for diagnosis. Monotherapy with clarithromycin (rather than doxycycline) appeared as a reasonable treatment option while immunosuppressed or -compromised patients and those with extended disease received combination therapy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HammHoeger2011,
  author    = {Hamm, Henning and H{\"o}ger, Peter H},
  title     = {Skin Tumors in Childhood},
  series = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International},
  number    = {20},
  doi       = {10.3238/arztebl.2011.0347},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-142402},
  pages     = {347-353},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background: Dermatologists, paediatricians, and general practitioners are often consulted by worried parents for the evaluation of a cutaneous tumor. Methods: Selective literature review. Results: Only 1-2\% of skin tumors excised in children turn out to be malignant when examined histologically. Warning signs of malignancy include rapid growth, firm consistency, diameter exceeding 3 cm, ulceration, a non-movable mass, and presence in the neonatal period. The more common malignant skin tumors in adults-basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma-are very rare in childhood. Congenital melanocytic nevi and sebaceous nevi bear a lower malignant potential than previously believed; nevertheless, their excision is often indicated. A Spitz nevus can mimic a melanoma both clinically and histologically. Some benign skin tumors of childhood tend to regress spontaneously within a few years but may cause complications at particular locations and when multiple. For infantile hemangiomas requiring systemic treatment because of imminent obstruction or ulceration, propranolol seems to have a far more favorable risk-benefit ratio than corticosteroids. Conclusion: Physicians need specialized knowledge in order to decide whether a skin tumor in a child should be excised, non-surgically treated, or further evaluated, or whether it can be safely left untreated because of the likelihood of spontaneous remission.},
  language  = {en}
}