@phdthesis{Nordblom2023,
  author    = {Nordblom, Noah Frieder},
  title     = {Synthese und Evaluation von Gephyrinsonden f{\"u}r hochaufl{\"o}sende Mikroskopieverfahren},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-30230},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-302300},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {This decade saw the development of new high-end light microscopy approaches. These technologies are increasingly used to expand our understanding of cellular function and the molecular mechanisms of life and disease. The precision of state-of-the-art super resolution microscopy is limited by the properties of the applied fluorescent label. Here I describe the synthesis and evaluation of new functional fluorescent probes that specifically stain gephyrin, universal marker of the neuronal inhibitory post-synapse. Selected probe precursor peptides were synthesised using solid phase peptide synthesis and conjugated with selected super resolution capable fluorescent dyes. Identity and purity were defined using chromatography and mass spectrometric methods. To probe the target specificity of the resulting probe variants in cellular context, a high-throughput assay was established. The established semi-automated and parallel workflow was used for the evaluation of three selected probes by defining their co-localization with the expressed fluorescent target protein. My work provided NN1Dc and established the probe as a visualisation tool for essentially background-free visualisation of the synaptic marker protein gephyrin in a cellular context. Furthermore, NN1DA became part of a toolbox for studying the inhibitory synapse ultrastructure and brain connectivity and turned out useful for the development of a label-free, high-throughput protein interaction quantification assay.},
  subject      = {Fluoreszenzmikroskopie},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Khayenko2023,
  author    = {Khayenko, Vladimir},
  title     = {Functional peptide-based probes for the visualization of inhibitory synapses},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-32043},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-320438},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Short functional peptidic probes can maximize the potential of high-end microscopy techniques and multiplex imaging assays and provide new insights into normal and aberrant molecular, cellular and tissue function. Particularly, the visualization of inhibitory synapses requires protocol tailoring for different sample types and imaging techniques and relies either on genetic manipulation or on antibodies that underperform in tissue immunofluorescence. Starting from an endogenous activity-related ligand of gephyrin, a universal marker of the inhibitory post-synapse, I developed a short peptidic multivalent binder with exceptional affinity and selectivity to gephyrin. By tailoring fluorophores to the binder, I have obtained Sylite, a probe for the visualization of inhibitory synapses, with an outstanding signal-to-background ratio, that bests the "gold standard" gephyrin antibodies both in selectivity and in tissue immunofluorescence. In tissue Sylite benefits from simplified handling, provides robust synaptic labeling in record-short time and, unlike antibodies, is not affected by staining artefacts. In super-resolution microscopy Sylite precisely localizes the post-synapse and enables accurate pre- to post-synapse measurements. Combined with complimentary tracing techniques Sylite reveals inhibitory connectivity and profiles inhibitory inputs and synapse sizes of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the periaqueductal gray brain region. Lastly, upon probe optimization for live cell application and with the help of novel thiol-reactive cell penetrating peptide I have visualized inhibitory synapses in living neurons. Taken together, my work provided a versatile probe for conventional and super-resolution microscopy and a workflow for the development and application of similar compact functional synthetic probes.},
  subject      = {Fluoreszenzsonde},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Kasaragod2022,
  author    = {Kasaragod, Vikram Babu},
  title     = {Biochemical and Structural Basis for the Moonlighting Function of Gephyrin},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-14307},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143077},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Neurons are specialized cells dedicated to transmit the nerve impulses throughout the human body across specialized structures called synapses. At the synaptic terminals, a crosstalk between multiple macromolecules regulates the structure and function of the presynaptic nerve endings and the postsynaptic recipient sites. Gephyrin is the central organizer at inhibitory postsynaptic specializations and plays a crucial role in the organization of these structures by anchoring GABAA receptors (GABAAR) and glycine receptors (GlyR) to the postsynaptic membrane. This 93 kDa protein features an N-terminal G domain and a C-terminal E domain and the latter interacts directly with the intracellular loop between transmembrane helices 3 and 4 of certain subunits of the GlyRs and GABAARs. Biochemical and structural analyses have already provided valuable insights into the gephyrin-GlyR interaction. Interestingly, biochemical studies on the gephyrin-GABAAR interaction demonstrated that the GABAARs also depend on the same binding site as the GlyRs for the interaction with the gephyrin, but the molecular basis for this receptor specific interaction of gephyrin was still unknown. Co-crystal structures of GephE-GABAAR α3- derived peptides with supporting biochemical data presented in this study deciphered the receptor-specific interactions of gephyrin in atomic detail. In its moonlighting function, gephyrin also catalyzes the terminal step of the evolutionarily conserved molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis. Molybdenum, an essential transition element has to be complexed with a pterin-based cofactor resulting in the formation of the molybdenum cofactor (Moco). Moco is an essential component at the active site of all molybdenum-containing enzymes with the exception of nitrogenase. Mutations in enzymes involved in this pathway lead to a rare yet severe disease called Moco deficiency, which manifest itself in severe neurodevelopmental abnormalities and early childhood death. Moco biosynthesis follows a complex multistep pathway, where in the penultimate step, the N-terminal G domain of gephyrin activates the molybdopterin to form an adenylated molybdopterin intermediate. In the terminal step, this intermediate is then transferred to the C-terminal E domain of gephyrin, which catalyzes the metal insertion and deadenylation reaction to form active Moco. Previous biochemical and structural studies provided valuable insights into the penultimate step of the Moco biosynthesis but the terminal step remained elusive. Through the course of my dissertation, I crystallized the C-terminal E domain in the apo-form as well as in complex with ADP and AMP. These structures shed lightonto the deadenylation reaction and the formation of a ternary E-domain-ADP-Mo/W complex and thus provide structural insight into the metal insertion mechanism. Moreover, the structures also provided molecular insights into a mutation leading to Moco deficiency. Finally, ternary complexes of GephE, ADP and receptor-derived peptides provided first clues regarding the integration of gephyrin's dual functionality. In summary, during the course of the dissertation I was able to derive high resolution structural insights into the interactions between gephyrin and GABAARs, which explain the receptor-specific interaction of gephyrin and, furthermore, these studies can be extended in the future to understand GABAAR subunit-specific interactions of gephyrin. Finally, the understanding of Moco biosynthesis shed light on the molecular basis of the fatal Moco deficiency.},
  subject      = {Gephyrin},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Sander2014,
  author    = {Sander, Bodo},
  title     = {Structural and biochemical characterization of gephyrin and various gephyrin-ligand complexes},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-104212},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Efficient synaptic neurotransmission requires the exact apposition of presynaptic terminals and matching neurotransmitter receptor clusters on the postsynaptic side. The receptors are embedded in the postsynaptic density, which also contains scaffolding and regulatory proteins that ensure high local receptor concentrations. At inhibitory synapses the cytosolic scaffolding protein gephyrin assumes an essential organizing role within the postsynaptic density by the formation of self-oligomers which provide a high density of binding sites for certain -amino butyric acid type A (GABAA) and the large majority of glycine receptors (GlyR). Gephyrin contains two oligomerization domains: In isolation, the 20 kDa N-terminal G domain (GephG) and the 46 kDa E domain (GephE) trimerize and dimerize, respectively. In the full-length protein the domains are interconnected by a central ~150 amino acid linker, and only GephG trimerization is utilized, whereas GephE dimerization is prevented, thus suggesting the need for a trigger to release GephE autoinhibition, which would pave the way for the formation of higher oligomers and for efficient receptor clustering. The structural basis for this GephE autoinhibition has remained elusive so far, but the linker was reported to be sufficient for autoinhibition. This work dealt with the biochemical and structural characterization of apo-gephyrin and gephyrin in complexes with ligands which are known to promote the formation of synaptic gephyrin clusters (collybistin and neuroligin 2) and reorganize them (dynein light chain 1). For full-length gephyrin no structural information has been available so far. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analyses described in this thesis disclosed that the gephyrin trimer forms a highly flexible assembly, which, due to the long linker, can switch between compact and extended conformational states in solution, with a preference for compact states. This partial compaction and potentially GephE autoinhibition are achieved by interactions of parts of the linker with the G and E domains, as suggested by circular dichroism spectroscopy. However, the linker on its own cannot account for GephE blockage, as size exclusion chromatography experiments coupled with multi angle light scattering detection (SEC-MALS) and SAXS analyses revealed that a gephyrin variant only encompassing the linker and GephE (GephLE) forms dimers and not monomers as suggested by an earlier study. The oligomeric state of GephLE and the observation that several gephyrin variants, in which linker segments of varying length were deleted, predominantly formed trimers, suggested the presence of a linker independent mechanism of GephE dimerization blockade. Taken together, the data indicated that linker-dependent and linker-independent mechanisms mediate gephyrin autoinhibition. In the second project gephyrin's interaction with DYNLL1 (Dynein LC8 Light Chain 1) was characterized. DYNLL1 is a 25 kDa dimer incorporated into the dynein motor and provides two binding sites, each of which can accommodate an octapeptide derived from gephyrin's linker region (referred to as GephDB). Originally, DYNLL1 was regarded as a cargo adaptor, linking gephyrin-GlyR complexes to the dynein motor, thus driving their retrograde transport and leading to a decrease of synaptic gephyrin-GlyR complexes. Building on these studies, this thesis assessed the cargo hypothesis as well as the so far unclear stoichiometry of the gephyrin-DYNLL1 complex. The cargo scenario would require ternary complex formation between gephyrin, DYNLL1 and the dynein intermediate chain (DIC) of the dynein motor. However, such a complex could not be detected by analytical size exclusion chromatography (aSEC) experiments - presumably because gephyrin and DIC competed for a common binding site in DYNLL1. This finding was consistent with a single DYNLL1 dimer capturing two linker segments of a single gephyrin trimer as suggested by a 26 kDa mass increase of the gephyrin species in the presence of DYNLL1 in SEC-MALS experiments. aSEC experiments at even higher concentrations (~20 µM gephyrin and ~80 µM DYNLL1) indicated that the affinity of GephDB was significantly impaired in the context of full-length gephyrin but also in a variant that bears only GephG and the first 39 residues of the linker (GephGL220). Presumably due to avidity effects two linkers stably associated with a single DYNLL1 dimer, whereas the third DYNLL1 binding motif remained predominantly unoccupied unless high concentrations of GephGL220 (50 µM) and DYNLL1 (200 µM) were used. These findings indicate that an interplay between GephG and the N-terminal linker segment mediates the attenuation of GephDB affinity towards DYNLL1 and that preventing DYNLL1 from the induction of higher gephyrin oligomers is either advantageous for DYNLL1-mediated reorganization of gephyrin-GlyR clusters or that DYNLL1 exerts possibly two (concentration-dependent) actions on gephyrin. The gephyrin-collybistin-neuroligin 2 complex was the subject of the third project. Previously, collybistin and gephyrin were observed to mutually trigger their translocation to the postsynaptic membrane, where the disordered cytoplasmic tail of the postsynaptic cell adhesion molecule NL2 (NL2cyt) causes the anchoring of collybistin 2 (CB2) by binding to its SH3 domain, thereby releasing SH3 domain mediated autoinhibiton of CB2 binding to the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate. Critical for this event is the binding of gephyrin to both CB2 and NL2, presumably via GephE. Following up on these previous studies biochemical data presented in this thesis confirm the formation of the ternary complex. Unexpectedly, analyses by means of native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis pointed to: (1) The existence of a complex containing NL2cyt and CB2 lacking the SH3 domain and consequently an additional NL2 binding site in CB2. (2) Attenuated gephyrin-collybistin complex formation in the presence of the SH3 domain. (3) A requirement for high NL2cyt concentrations (> 30 µM) during the formation of the ternary complex. This might allow for the regulation by other factors such as additional binding partners or posttranslational modifications. Although of preliminary character, these results provide a starting point for future studies, which will hopefully elucidate the interplay between gephyrin, collybistin, NL2 and certain GABAA receptors.},
  subject      = {Gephyrin},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Maric2012,
  author    = {Maric, Hans-Michael},
  title     = {Molecular Basis of the Multivalent Glycine and γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Anchoring},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85712},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {γ-Aminobutters{\"a}ure-Rezeptoren vom Typ A (GABAARs) und Glyzin-Rezeptoren (GlyRs) sind die wichtigsten Vermittler der schnellen synaptischen Inhibition im zentralen Nervensystem. Von wesentlicher Bedeutung f{\"u}r ihre ordnungsgem{\"a}ße Funktion in der inhibitorischen Signal{\"u}bertragung ist ihre pr{\"a}zise Lokalisation und Konzentration innerhalb der neuronalen Oberfl{\"a}chenmembran. Diese Eigenschaften werden durch Ger{\"u}stproteine vermittelt, welche direkt an die großen intrazellul{\"a}ren Schleifen der Rezeptoren, sowie an Bausteine des neuronalen Zytoskeletts binden. In meiner Dissertation habe ich die molekularen Details mehrerer zugrunde liegenden Protein-Protein Wechselwirkungen untersucht. Im Speziellen habe ich die Interaktion ausgew{\"a}hlter GABAAR und GlyR Untereinheiten mit den Ger{\"u}stproteinen Gephyrin, Radixin und Collybistin analysiert. Ich habe kurze lineare Aminos{\"a}uren-Motive innerhalb der großen intrazellul{\"a}ren Schleifen der Rezeptoren identifiziert, welche die direkten und Untereinheit-spezifischen Interaktionen vermitteln. Die Quantifizierung der jeweiligen Bindungsst{\"a}rke ergab, dass Gephyrins E-Dom{\"a}ne vor allem an die GABAAR α1 (Kd = 17 M) und α3 (Kd = 5 M) -Untereinheiten bindet, wohingegen die SH3-Dom{\"a}ne von Collybistin haupts{\"a}chlich mit der GABAAR α2-Untereinheit interagiert (Kd = 1 M). Demgegen{\"u}ber bindet die FERM-Dom{\"a}ne von Radixin fest an die α5-Untereinheit des GABAAR (Kd = 8 µM). Weiterhin zeigt meine Arbeit, dass diese einfache Beziehung durch (i) fehlende oder (ii) {\"u}berlappende Bindungsspezifit{\"a}ten zwischen den Ger{\"u}stproteinen und den Rezeptor-Untereinheiten komplex reguliert wird. Ferner beschreibe ich hier, wie im Folgenden ausgef{\"u}hrt, die M{\"o}glichkeit einer (iii) negativen Modulation mittels posttranslationaler Modifikation, sowie einer Verst{\"a}rkung der Bindung durch (iv) Avidit{\"a}ts-Effekte. (i) Als erstes habe ich mit Hilfe biochemischer Methoden die Radixin-GABAAR α5 Interaktion im Detail untersucht. Meine Strukturanalyse und Kompetitionsstudien legen den Schluss nahe, dass Radixin die betreffende Rezeptor-Untereinheit mittels einer universellen Bindungstasche in der F3 Subdom{\"a}ne innerhalb seiner FERM Dom{\"a}ne bindet. Diese Bindungsstelle wird durch zwei markante Strukturelemente gebildet: Einer α-Helix, die eine große hydrophobe Tasche bildet, welche eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher hydrophober Reste in verschiedenen Konformationen akzeptiert, sowie ein β-Strang, der Peptidr{\"u}ckgrat-Interaktionen eingehen kann. Es {\"u}berrascht nicht, dass eine Vielzahl an Studien die Beteiligung dieser Bindungsseite mit unterschiedlichen Liganden beschrieben hat. Diese Promiskuit{\"a}t unterstreicht die Bedeutung des Aktivierungsmechanismus der zuvor f{\"u}r die Radixin FERM GABAAR α5-Untereinheit beschrieben wurde und impliziert weitere Regulationsmechanismen, die eine koordinierte Interaktion in vivo erm{\"o}glichen. (ii) Weiterhin habe ich mich ausf{\"u}hrlich der Analyse der Gephyrin-vermittelten GABAAR Clusterbildung gewidmet. Meine r{\"o}ntgenkristallographischen Studien und Bindungsstudien zeigen, dass Gephyrin mit den GABAAR α1, α2 und α3 Untereinheiten {\"u}ber eine universelle Bindungsstelle interagiert, welche auch die Wechselwirkungen mit der β-Untereinheit des GlyR vermittelt. Mittels Struktur-basierter Mutagenesestudien konnte ich die Schl{\"u}sselreste innerhalb von Gephyrin und der Rezeptor-Untereinheiten identifizieren, die einen entscheidenden Beitrag zur Gesamt-Bindungsst{\"a}rke liefern. Insbesondere zwei konservierte aromatische Reste in der N-terminalen H{\"a}lfte der Rezeptorbindungsregion gehen entscheidende hydrophobe Wechselwirkungen mit Gephyrin ein. Dementsprechend konnte J. Mukherjee, ein Mitarbeiter in der Gruppe unseres Kooperationspartners Steven J. Moss, zeigen, dass der Austausch dieser Reste innerhalb der α2-Untereinheit des GABAAR ausreicht, um einen deutlichen R{\"u}ckgang der Rezeptor Cluster-Anzahl und ihrer Gr{\"o}ße in prim{\"a}ren hippokampalen Neuronen zu verursachen. Die Ausweitung meiner Rezeptor-Interaktions-Studien auf Collybistin (CB) ergab, dass dieses Protein im Vergleich zu Gephyrin eine umgekehrte, aber dennoch {\"u}berlappende Rezeptor-Untereinheiten-Pr{\"a}ferenz aufweist. Die GABAAR α3-Untereinheit bindet ausschließlich an Gephyrin (Kd = 5 µM), w{\"a}hrend die GABAAR α1-Untereinheit zwar vor allem Gephyrin bindet (Kd = 17 µM), zus{\"a}tzlich jedoch eine schwache Affinit{\"a}t (Kd ≈ 400 µM) f{\"u}r die SH3-Dom{\"a}ne von CB aufweist. Im Gegensatz dazu bindet die GABAAR α2-Untereinheit hochaffin an die SH3-Dom{\"a}ne von CB (Kd = 1 µM) und zeigt zus{\"a}tzlich eine schwache Gephyrin Affinit{\"a}t (Kd ≈ 500 µM). Interessanterweise konnte ich Synergieeffekte zwischen der GABAAR α2-Untereinheit, Gephyrins E-Dom{\"a}ne und CBs SH3-Dom{\"a}ne ausschließen und statt dessen zeigen, dass diese Rezeptor-Untereinheit exklusiv entweder Gephyrin oder CB bindet. Diese Ergebnisse lassen vermuten, dass die Rolle von CB in der Rezeptor-Anh{\"a}ufung allein durch die konkurrierenden Bindungs-Ereignisse seiner konstituierenden Dom{\"a}nen bestimmt wird. Die intramolekulare Assoziation zwischen der PH und der DH-Dom{\"a}ne mit der SH3-Dom{\"a}ne von CB konkurriert mit unterschiedlichen intermolekularen Wechselwirkungen von CB. Und zwar mit der GABAAR α2-Untereinheit-Bindung an die SH3-Dom{\"a}ne, mit der PIP2-Bindung an die PH-Dom{\"a}ne, sowie mit der Gephyrin-Bindung, welche vermutlich von der PH und DH-Dom{\"a}ne von CB vermittelt wird. (iii) Interessanterweise best{\"a}tigen fr{\"u}here Studien, dass die Rezeptor-Motive, die ich hier identifiziert habe und welche direkt mit den Ger{\"u}st-Proteinen wechselwirken, in vivo posttranslational modifiziert vorliegen. Insbesondere wurde gezeigt, dass die Gephyrin-Bindemotive der GABAAR α1-Untereinheit und GlyR β-Untereinheiten Ziele des ERK/MAPK und PKC-Phosphorylierungs-Weges sind, w{\"a}hrend das Radixin-Bindungs-Motiv innerhalb der GABAAR α5-Untereinheit ubiquitiniert vorliegt. In dieser Dissertation habe ich im Besonderen die ERK-Phosphorylierung von Thr348 in der GABAAR α1-Untereinheit untersucht. Tats{\"a}chlich konnten meine Bindungs-Assays eine starke Reduktion der direkten Gephyrin Bindungsst{\"a}rke beim Einbringen eines phosphomimetischen Restes best{\"a}tigen. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus konnte J. Mukherjee eine signifikante Reduktion der Cluster-Anzahl und Gr{\"o}ße beim Einf{\"u}hren der gleichen Mutation in die α1-Untereinheit beinhaltenden GABAARs in hippokampalen Neuronen beobachten. Der ERK/MAPK-Regulation-Weg ist daher ein aussichtsreicher Kandidat f{\"u}r die Regulation der GABAergen-Signal{\"u}bertragung. (iv) In vivo bildet Gephyrin vermutlich durch Selbstorganisation seiner G (GephG) und E-Dom{\"a}nen (GephE) ein multivalentes Ger{\"u}st. Angesichts der multimeren Natur Gephyrins und der pentameren Rezeptorarchitektur habe ich die M{\"o}glichkeit von Avidit{\"a}ts-Effekten im Prozess der synaptischen Neurotransmitter-Rezeptor-Anh{\"a}ufung untersucht. Die Kristallstrukturen von GephE im Komplex mit ausgew{\"a}hlten Peptiden zeigen zwei Rezeptor-Bindungsstellen in r{\"a}umlicher N{\"a}he (15 {\AA}). Auf der Basis dieser Information habe ich bivalente Peptide entworfen, welche beide Rezeptor-Bindungsstellen in Gephyrin simultan besetzen k{\"o}nnen und, wie erwartet, konnte ich mit Hilfe verschiedener biophysikalischen Methoden eine un{\"u}bertroffen hohe, durch Avidit{\"a}t potenzierte, Gephyrin-Affinit{\"a}t nachweisen. Mir gelang es diesen Avidit{\"a}ts-Effekt f{\"u}r einen schwachen Gephyrin Liganden, ein GABAAR-abgeleitetes Peptid, welcher nicht mit herk{\"o}mmlichen monomeren Liganden untersucht werden konnte, nutzbar zu machen. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus konnte ich zeigen, dass diese Verbindung gezielt die Rezeptor-Bindungsstelle in GephE besetzt und auf diese Weise hemmend auf Gephyrins Rezeptorbindungsaktivit{\"a}t wirkt. Eine weitere Entwicklung dieser Verbindung k{\"o}nnte die M{\"o}glichkeit er{\"o}ffnen, spezifisch die Wirkung der Entkopplung der Gephyrin Rezeptor-Interaktion in der Zellkultur-Experimenten zu analysieren ohne dabei die Anzahl oder die Funktion der Proteine zu beeintr{\"a}chtigen, was einen Nebeneffekt von konventionellen Methoden wie Gen „knock-out", RNA-Interferenz oder den Einsatz von Antik{\"o}rpern darstellt.},
  subject      = {Gephyrin},
  language  = {en}
}