@article{RackeveiBorgesEngstleretal.2022,
  author    = {Rackevei, Antonia S. and Borges, Alyssa and Engstler, Markus and Dandekar, Thomas and Wolf, Matthias},
  title     = {About the analysis of 18S rDNA sequence data from trypanosomes in barcoding and phylogenetics: tracing a continuation error occurring in the literature},
  series = {Biology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Biology},
  number    = {11},
  issn      = {2079-7737},
  doi       = {10.3390/biology11111612},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297562},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The variable regions (V1-V9) of the 18S rDNA are routinely used in barcoding and phylogenetics. In handling these data for trypanosomes, we have noticed a misunderstanding that has apparently taken a life of its own in the literature over the years. In particular, in recent years, when studying the phylogenetic relationship of trypanosomes, the use of V7/V8 was systematically established. However, considering the current numbering system for all other organisms (including other Euglenozoa), V7/V8 was never used. In Maia da Silva et al. [Parasitology 2004, 129, 549-561], V7/V8 was promoted for the first time for trypanosome phylogenetics, and since then, more than 70 publications have replicated this nomenclature and even discussed the benefits of the use of this region in comparison to V4. However, the primers used to amplify the variable region of trypanosomes have actually amplified V4 (concerning the current 18S rDNA numbering system).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PliegerWolf2022,
  author    = {Plieger, Tanja and Wolf, Matthias},
  title     = {18S and ITS2 rDNA sequence-structure phylogeny of Prototheca (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae)},
  series = {Biologia},
  volume    = {77},
  journal   = {Biologia},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {1336-9563},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11756-021-00971-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-269897},
  pages     = {569-582},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Protothecosis is an infectious disease caused by organisms currently classified within the green algal genus Prototheca. The disease can manifest as cutaneous lesions, olecranon bursitis or disseminated or systemic infections in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients. Concerning diagnostics, taxonomic validity is important. Prototheca, closely related to the Chlorella species complex, is known to be polyphyletic, branching with Auxenochlorella and Helicosporidium. The phylogeny of Prototheca was discussed and revisited several times in the last decade; new species have been described. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and partial mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) sequence data. In this work we use Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) as well as 18S rDNA data. However, for the first time, we reconstruct phylogenetic relationships of Prototheca using primary sequence and RNA secondary structure information simultaneously, a concept shown to increase robustness and accuracy of phylogenetic tree estimation. Using encoded sequence-structure data, Neighbor-Joining, Maximum-Parsimony and Maximum-Likelihood methods yielded well-supported trees in agreement with other trees calculated on rDNA; but differ in several aspects from trees using cytb as a phylogenetic marker. ITS2 secondary structures of Prototheca sequences are in agreement with the well-known common core structure of eukaryotes but show unusual differences in their helix lengths. An elongation of the fourth helix of some species seems to have occurred independently in the course of evolution.},
  language  = {en}
}