@article{GerhardtKordsmeyerSehneretal.2023,
  author    = {Gerhardt, Louisa M. S. and Kordsmeyer, Maren and Sehner, Susanne and G{\"u}der, G{\"u}lmisal and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Edelmann, Frank and Wachter, Rolf and Pankuweit, Sabine and Prettin, Christiane and Ertl, Georg and Wanner, Christoph and Angermann, Christiane E.},
  title     = {Prevalence and prognostic impact of chronic kidney disease and anaemia across ACC/AHA precursor and symptomatic heart failure stages},
  series = {Clinical Research in Cardiology},
  volume    = {112},
  journal   = {Clinical Research in Cardiology},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00392-022-02027-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323990},
  pages     = {868-879},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Background The importance of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia has not been comprehensively studied in asymptomatic patients at risk for heart failure (HF) versus those with symptomatic HF. We analysed the prevalence, characteristics and prognostic impact of both conditions across American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) precursor and HF stages A-D. Methods and results 2496 participants from three non-pharmacological German Competence Network HF studies were categorized by ACC/AHA stage; stage C patients were subdivided into C1 and C2 (corresponding to NYHA classes I/II and III, respectively). Overall, patient distribution was 8.1\%/35.3\%/32.9\% and 23.7\% in ACC/AHA stages A/B/C1 and C2/D, respectively. These subgroups were stratified by the absence ( - ) or presence ( +) of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) and anaemia (haemoglobin in women/men < 12/ < 13 g/dL). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up. Prevalence increased across stages A/B/C1 and C2/D (CKD: 22.3\%/23.6\%/31.6\%/54.7\%; anaemia: 3.0\%/7.9\%/21.7\%/33.2\%, respectively), with concordant decreases in median eGFR and haemoglobin (all p < 0.001). Across all stages, hazard ratios [95\% confidence intervals] for all-cause mortality were 2.1 [1.8-2.6] for CKD + , 1.7 [1.4-2.0] for anaemia, and 3.6 [2.9-4.6] for CKD + /anaemia + (all p < 0.001). Population attributable fractions (PAFs) for 5-year mortality related to CKD and/or anaemia were similar across stages A/B, C1 and C2/D (up to 33.4\%, 30.8\% and 34.7\%, respectively). Conclusions Prevalence and severity of CKD and anaemia increased across ACC/AHA stages. Both conditions were individually and additively associated with increased 5-year mortality risk, with similar PAFs in asymptomatic patients and those with symptomatic HF.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EdelmannWachterDuengenetal.2011,
  author    = {Edelmann, Frank and Wachter, Rolf and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Richter, Annette and Stahrenberg, Raoul and Neumann, Till and L{\"u}ers, Claus and Angermann, Christiane E. and Mehrhof, Felix and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Pieske, Burkert},
  title     = {Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline},
  series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  number    = {15},
  doi       = {10.1186/1475-2840-10-15},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140397},
  pages     = {1-8},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background: To assess heart failure therapies in diabetic patients with preserved as compared to impaired systolic ventricular function. Methods: 3304 patients with heart failure from 9 different studies were included (mean age 63 +/- 14 years); out of these, 711 subjects had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>= 50\%) and 994 patients in the whole cohort suffered from diabetes. Results: The majority (>90\%) of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (SHF) and diabetes were treated with an ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or with beta-blockers. By contrast, patients with diabetes and preserved ejection fraction (HFNEF) were less likely to receive these substance classes (p < 0.001) and had a worse blood pressure control (p < 0.001). In comparison to patients without diabetes, the probability to receive these therapies was increased in diabetic HFNEF patients (p < 0.001), but not in diabetic SHF patients. Aldosterone receptor blockers were given more often to diabetic patients with reduced ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and the presence and severity of diabetes decreased the probability to receive this substance class, irrespective of renal function. Conclusions: Diabetic patients with HFNEF received less heart failure medication and showed a poorer control of blood pressure as compared to diabetic patients with SHF. SHF patients with diabetes were less likely to receive aldosterone receptor blocker therapy, irrespective of renal function.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EdelmannStahrenbergGelbrichetal.2011,
  author    = {Edelmann, Frank and Stahrenberg, Raoul and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Durstewitz, Kathleen and Angermann, Christiane E. and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk and Scheffold, Thomas and Zugck, Christian and Maisch, Bernhard and Regitz-Zagrosek, Vera and Hasenfuß, Gerd and Pieske, Burkert M. and Wachter, Rolf},
  title     = {Contribution of comorbidities to functional impairment is higher in heart failure with preserved than with reduced ejection fraction},
  series = {Clinical Research in Cardiology},
  volume    = {100},
  journal   = {Clinical Research in Cardiology},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00392-011-0305-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134354},
  pages     = {755-764},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background Comorbidities negatively affect prognosis more strongly in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) than with reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction. Their comparative impact on physical impairment in HFpEF and HFrEF has not been evaluated so far. Methods and results The frequency of 12 comorbidities and their impact on NYHA class and SF-36 physical functioning score (SF-36 PF) were evaluated in 1,294 patients with HFpEF and 2,785 with HFrEF. HFpEF patients had lower NYHA class (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) and higher SF-36 PF score (54.4 ± 28.3 vs. 54.4 ± 27.7, p < 0.001). All comorbidities were significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent in HFrEF, except hypertension and obesity, which were more frequent in HFpEF (p < 0.001). Adjusting for age and gender, COPD, anemia, hyperuricemia, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes had a similar (p for interaction > 0.05) negative effect in both groups. Obesity, coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial occlusive disease exerted a significantly (p < 0.05) more adverse effect in HFpEF, while hypertension and hyperlipidemia were associated with fewer (p < 0.05) symptoms in HFrEF only. The total impact of comorbidities on NYHA (AUC for prediction of NYHA III/IV vs. I/II) and SF-36 PF (r 2) in multivariate analyses was approximately 1.5-fold higher in HFpEF, and also much stronger than the impact of a 10\% decrease in ejection fraction in HFrEF or a 5 mm decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in HFpEF. Conclusion The impact of comorbidities on physical impairment is higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF. This should be considered in the differential diagnosis and in the treatment of patients with HFpEF.},
  language  = {en}
}