@article{KoehlerAdamFussetal.2022,
  author    = {Koehler, Viktoria Florentine and Adam, Pia and Fuss, Carmina Teresa and Jiang, Linmiao and Berg, Elke and Frank-Raue, Karin and Raue, Friedhelm and Hoster, Eva and Kn{\"o}sel, Thomas and Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich and Negele, Thomas and Siebolts, Udo and Lorenz, Kerstin and Allelein, Stephanie and Schott, Matthias and Spitzweg, Christine and Kroiss, Matthias},
  title     = {Treatment of RET-positive advanced medullary thyroid cancer with multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors — a retrospective multi-center registry analysis},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {14},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14143405},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281776},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background: RET (rearranged during transfection) variants are the most prevalent oncogenic events in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). In advanced disease, multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MKIs) cabozantinib and vandetanib are the approved standard treatment irrespective of RET status. The actual outcome of patients with RET-positive MTC treated with MKIs is ill described. Methods: We here retrospectively determined the RET oncogene variant status with a targeted DNA Custom Panel in a prospectively collected cohort of 48 patients with advanced MTC treated with vandetanib and/or cabozantinib at four German referral centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In total, 44/48 (92\%) patients had germline or somatic RET variants. The M918T variant was found in 29/44 (66\%) cases. In total, 2/32 (6\%) patients with a somatic RET variant had further somatic variants, while in 1/32 (3\%) patient with a germline RET variant, additional variants were found. Only 1/48 (2\%) patient had a pathogenic HRAS variant, and no variants were found in 3 cases. In first-line treatment, the median OS was 53 (95\% CI (95\% confidence interval), 32-NR (not reached); n = 36), and the median PFS was 21 months (12-39; n = 33) in RET-positive MTC patients. In second-line treatment, the median OS was 18 (13-79; n = 22), and the median PFS was 3.5 months (2-14; n = 22) in RET-positive cases. Conclusions: RET variants were highly prevalent in patients with advanced MTC. The treatment results in RET-positive cases were similar to those reported in unselected cohorts.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AssfalgSeligTolksdorfetal.2020,
  author    = {Assfalg, Volker and Selig, Katharina and Tolksdorf, Johanna and van Meel, Marieke and de Vries, Erwin and Ramsoebhag, Anne-Marie and Rahmel, Axel and Renders, Lutz and Novotny, Alexander and Matevossian, Edouard and Schneeberger, Stefan and Rosenkranz, Alexander R. and Berlakovich, Gabriela and Ysebaert, Dirk and Knops, No{\"e}l and Kuypers, Dirk and Weekers, Laurent and Muehlfeld, Anja and Rump, Lars-Christian and Hauser, Ingeborg and Pisarski, Przemyslaw and Weimer, Rolf and Fornara, Paolo and Fischer, Lutz and Kliem, Volker and Sester, Urban and Stippel, Dirk and Arns, Wolfgang and Hau, Hans-Michael and Nitschke, Martin and Hoyer, Joachim and Thorban, Stefan and Weinmann-Menke, Julia and Heller, Katharina and Banas, Bernhard and Schwenger, Vedat and Nadalin, Silvio and Lopau, Kai and H{\"u}ser, Norbert and Heemann, Uwe},
  title     = {Repeated kidney re-transplantation—the Eurotransplant experience: a retrospective multicenter outcome analysis},
  series = {Transplant International},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {Transplant International},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1111/tri.13569},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214161},
  pages     = {617 -- 631},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS), candidates can be considered unlimitedly for repeated re-transplantation. Data on outcome and benefit are indeterminate. We performed a retrospective 15-year patient and graft outcome data analysis from 1464 recipients of a third or fourth or higher sequential deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) from 42 transplant centers. Repeated re-DDRT recipients were younger (mean 43.0 vs. 50.2 years) compared to first DDRT recipients. They received grafts with more favorable HLA matches (89.0\% vs. 84.5\%) but thereby no statistically significant improvement of patient and graft outcome was found as comparatively demonstrated in 1st DDRT. In the multivariate modeling accounting for confounding factors, mortality and graft loss after 3rd and ≥4th DDRT (P < 0.001 each) and death with functioning graft (DwFG) after 3rd DDRT (P = 0.001) were higher as compared to 1st DDRT. The incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF) was also significantly higher in re-DDRT (12.7\%) than in 1st DDRT (7.1\%; P < 0.001). Facing organ shortage, increasing waiting time, and considerable mortality on dialysis, we question the current policy of repeated re-DDRT. The data from this survey propose better HLA matching in first DDRT and second DDRT and careful selection of candidates, especially for ≥4th DDRT.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PippiasStelDiezetal.2015,
  author    = {Pippias, Maria and Stel, Vianda S. and Diez, Jos{\´e} Maria Abad and Afentakis, Nikolaos and Herrero-Calvo, Jose Antonio and Arias, Manuel and Tomilina, Natalia and Caama{\~n}o, Encarnaci{\´o}n Bouzas and Buturovic-Ponikvar, Jadranka and Čala, Svjetlana and Caskey, Fergus J. and de la Nuez, Pablo Castro and Cernevskis, Harijs and Collart, Frederic and de la Torre, Ram{\´o}n Alonso and de los {\´A}ngeles Garc{\´i}a Bazaga, Maria and De Meester, Johan and D{\´i}az, Joan Manuel and Djukanovic, Ljubica and Alamar, Manuel Ferrer and Finne, Patrik and Garneata, Liliana and Golan, Eliezer and Gonz{\´a}lez Fern{\´a}ndez, Raquel and Guti{\´e}rrez Avila, Gonzalo and Heaf, James and Hoitsma, Andries and Kantaria, Nino and Kolesnyk, Mykola and Kramar, Reinhard and Kramer, Anneke and Lassalle, Mathilde and Leivestad, Torbj{\o}rn and Lopot, Frantisek and Mac{\´a}rio, Fernando and Magaz, Angela and Mart{\´i}n-Escobar, Eduardo and Metcalfe, Wendy and Noordzij, Marlies and Palsson, Runolfur and Pechter, {\"U}lle and Pr{\"u}tz, Karl G. and Ratkovic, Marina and Resić, Halima and Rutkowski, Boleslaw and de Pablos, Carmen Santiuste and Spustov{\´a}, Viera and S{\"u}leymanlar, G{\"u}ltekin and Van Stralen, Karlijn and Thereska, Nestor and Wanner, Christoph and Jager, Kitty J.},
  title     = {Renal replacement therapy in Europe: a summary of the 2012 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report},
  series = {Clinical Kidney Journal},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Clinical Kidney Journal},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1093/ckj/sfv014},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-150054},
  pages     = {248-261},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background This article summarizes the 2012 European Renal Association—European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry Annual Report (available at www.era-edta-reg.org) with a specific focus on older patients (defined as ≥65 years). Methods Data provided by 45 national or regional renal registries in 30 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea were used. Individual patient level data were received from 31 renal registries, whereas 14 renal registries contributed data in an aggregated form. The incidence, prevalence and survival probabilities of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) and renal transplantation rates for 2012 are presented. Results In 2012, the overall unadjusted incidence rate of patients with ESRD receiving RRT was 109.6 per million population (pmp) (n = 69 035), ranging from 219.9 pmp in Portugal to 24.2 pmp in Montenegro. The proportion of incident patients ≥75 years varied from 15 to 44\% between countries. The overall unadjusted prevalence on 31 December 2012 was 716.7 pmp (n = 451 270), ranging from 1670.2 pmp in Portugal to 146.7 pmp in the Ukraine. The proportion of prevalent patients ≥75 years varied from 11 to 32\% between countries. The overall renal transplantation rate in 2012 was 28.3 pmp (n = 15 673), with the highest rate seen in the Spanish region of Catalonia. The proportion of patients ≥65 years receiving a transplant ranged from 0 to 35\%. Five-year adjusted survival for all RRT patients was 59.7\% (95\% confidence interval, CI: 59.3-60.0) which fell to 39.3\% (95\% CI: 38.7-39.9) in patients 65-74 years and 21.3\% (95\% CI: 20.8-21.9) in patients ≥75 years.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AltieriLaSalviaModicaetal.2023,
  author    = {Altieri, Barbara and La Salvia, Anna and Modica, Roberta and Marciello, Francesca and Mercier, Olaf and Filosso, Pier Luigi and de Latour, Bertrand Richard and Giuffrida, Dario and Campione, Severo and Guggino, Gianluca and Fadel, Elie and Papotti, Mauro and Colao, Annamaria and Scoazec, Jean-Yves and Baudin, Eric and Faggiano, Antongiulio},
  title     = {Recurrence-free survival in early and locally advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung after complete tumor resection},
  series = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2075-4426},
  doi       = {10.3390/jpm13020330},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-304000},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Background: Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of lung cancer with poor clinical outcomes. Data on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in early and locally advanced pure LCNEC after complete resection (R0) are lacking. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in this subgroup of patients and to identify potential prognostic markers. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study including patients with pure LCNEC stage I-III and R0 resection. Clinicopathological characteristics, RFS, and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: 39 patients (M:F = 26:13), with a median age of 64 years (44-83), were included. Lobectomy (69.2\%), bilobectomy (5.1\%), pneumonectomy (18\%), and wedge resection (7.7\%) were performed mostly associated with lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant therapy included platinum-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in 58.9\% of cases. After a median follow-up of 44 (4-169) months, the median RFS was 39 months with 1-, 2- and 5-year RFS rates of 60.0\%, 54.6\%, and 44.9\%, respectively. Median DSS was 72 months with a 1-, 2- and 5-year rate of 86.8, 75.9, and 57.4\%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, age (cut-off 65 years old) and pN status were independent prognostic factors for both RFS (HR = 4.19, 95\%CI = 1.46-12.07, p = 0.008 and HR = 13.56, 95\%CI 2.45-74.89, p = 0.003, respectively) and DSS (HR = 9.30, 95\%CI 2.23-38.83, p = 0.002 and HR = 11.88, 95\%CI 2.28-61.84, p = 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: After R0 resection of LCNEC, half of the patients recurred mostly within the first two years of follow-up. Age and lymph node metastasis could help to stratify patients for adjuvant therapy.},
  language  = {en}
}