@article{MaggRieglerWiedmannetal.2015, author = {Magg, Barbara and Riegler, Christoph and Wiedmann, Silke and Heuschmann, Peter and Sommer, Claudia and {\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan}, title = {Self-administered version of the Fabry-associated pain questionnaire for adult patients}, series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, volume = {10}, journal = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, number = {113}, doi = {10.1186/s13023-015-0325-7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145294}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background Fabry-associated pain may be the first symptom of Fabry disease (FD) and presents with a unique phenotype including mostly acral burning triggerable pain attacks, evoked pain, pain crises, and permanent pain. We recently developed and validated the first Fabry Pain Questionnaire (FPQ) for adult patients. Here we report on the validation of the self-administered version of the FPQ that no longer requires a face-to-face interview but can be filled in by the patients themselves allowing more flexible data collection. Methods At our W{\"u}rzburg Fabry Center for Interdisciplinary Treatment, Germany, we have developed the self-administered version of the FPQ by adapting the questionnaire to a self-report version. To do this, consecutive Fabry patients with current or past pain history (n = 56) were first interviewed face-to-face. Two weeks later patients' self-reported questionnaire results were collected by mail (n = 55). We validated the self-administered version of the FPQ by assessing the inter-rater reliability agreement of scores obtained by supervised administration and self-administration of the FPQ. Results The FPQ contains 15 questions on the different pain phenotypes, on pain development during life with and without therapy, and on impairment due to pain. Statistical analysis showed that the majority of questions were answered in high agreement in both sessions with a mean AC1-statistic of 0.857 for 55 nominal-scaled items and a mean ICC of 0.587 for 9 scores. Conclusions This self-administered version of the first pain questionnaire for adult Fabry patients is a useful tool to assess Fabry-associated pain without a time-consuming face-to-face interview but via a self-reporting survey allowing more flexible usage.}, language = {en} } @article{BiegstraatenArngrimssonBarbeyetal.2015, author = {Biegstraaten, Marieke and Arngr{\´i}msson, Reynir and Barbey, Frederic and Boks, Lut and Cecchi, Franco and Deegan, Patrick B and Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla and Geberhiwot, Tarekegn and Germain, Dominique P and Hendriksz, Chris and Hughes, Derralynn A and Kantola, Ilkka and Karabul, Nesrin and Lavery, Christine and Linthorst, Gabor E and Mehta, Atul and van de Mheen, Erica and Oliveira, Jo{\~a}o P and Parini, Rossella and Ramaswami, Uma and Rudnicki, Michael and Serra, Andreas and Sommer, Claudia and Sunder-Plassmann, Gere and Svarstad, Einar and Sweeb, Annelies and Terryn, Wim and Tylki-Szymanska, Anna and T{\o}ndel, Camilla and Vujkovac, Bojan and Weidemann, Frank and Wijburg, Frits A and Woolfson, Peter and Hollak, Carla EM}, title = {Recommendations for initiation and cessation of enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Fabry disease: the European Fabry Working Group consensus document}, series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, volume = {10}, journal = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, number = {36}, doi = {10.1186/s13023-015-0253-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-175374}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Introduction: Fabry disease (FD) is a lysosomal storage disorder resulting in progressive nervous system, kidney and heart disease. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) may halt or attenuate disease progression. Since administration is burdensome and expensive, appropriate use is mandatory. We aimed to define European consensus recommendations for the initiation and cessation of ERT in patients with FD. Methods: A Delphi procedure was conducted with an online survey (n = 28) and a meeting (n = 15). Patient organization representatives were present at the meeting to give their views. Recommendations were accepted with ≥75\% agreement and no disagreement. Results: For classically affected males, consensus was achieved that ERT is recommended as soon as there are early clinical signs of kidney, heart or brain involvement, but may be considered in patients of ≥16 years in the absence of clinical signs or symptoms of organ involvement. Classically affected females and males with non-classical FD should be treated as soon as there are early clinical signs of kidney, heart or brain involvement, while treatment may be considered in females with non-classical FD with early clinical signs that are considered to be due to FD. Consensus was achieved that treatment should not be withheld from patients with severe renal insufficiency (GFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m\(^{2}\)) and from those on dialysis or with cognitive decline, but carefully considered on an individual basis. Stopping ERT may be considered in patients with end stage FD or other co-morbidities, leading to a life expectancy of <1 year. In those with cognitive decline of any cause, or lack of response for 1 year when the sole indication for ERT is neuropathic pain, stopping ERT may be considered. Also, in patients with end stage renal disease, without an option for renal transplantation, in combination with advanced heart failure (NYHA class IV), cessation of ERT should be considered. ERT in patients who are non-compliant or fail to attend regularly at visits should be stopped. Conclusion: The recommendations can be used as a benchmark for initiation and cessation of ERT, although final decisions should be made on an individual basis. Future collaborative efforts are needed for optimization of these recommendations.}, language = {en} }