@article{PaakkariPaakkariLandesetal.1993, author = {Paakkari, P. and Paakkari, I. and Landes, P. and Sir{\´e}n, Anna-Leena and Feuerstein, G.}, title = {Respiratory \(\mu\)-Opioid and benzodiazepine interactions in the understrained rat}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62974}, year = {1993}, abstract = {lnteractions of p-opioid receptors with the benzodiazepine system were studied by examining the modulatory effects of flumazenil (a benzodiazepine antagonist) and alprazolam (a benzodiazepine agonist) on the respiratory effects ofthe opioid peptide dermorphin. Dermorphin, 1-30 nmol administered i.c.v., to conscious, unrestrained rats decreased ventilation rate (VR) and minute volume (MV) dose-dependently. The ventilatory depression was antagonized by naloxone and by the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil. The benzodiazepine alprazolam potentiateri the respiratory inhibition of a small (I nmol) dose of dermorphin but antagonized that of a higher dos:~ (3 nmol). The results suggest that the benzodiazepine/GABA receptor complex modulates respiratory depression induced by centrat p-receptor Stimulation in the rat.}, subject = {Neurobiologie}, language = {en} } @article{OehlerMohammadiPerpinaVicianoetal.2017, author = {Oehler, Beatrice and Mohammadi, Milad and Perpina Viciano, Cristina and Hackel, Dagmar and Hoffmann, Carsten and Brack, Alexander and Rittner, Heike L.}, title = {Peripheral interaction of Resolvin D1 and E1 with opioid receptor antagonists for antinociception in inflammatory pain in rats}, series = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, volume = {10}, journal = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, number = {242}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158642}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Antinociceptive pathways are activated in the periphery in inflammatory pain, for instance resolvins and opioid peptides. Resolvins are biosynthesized from omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid. Resolvin D1 (RvD1) and resolvin E1 (RvE1) initiate the resolution of inflammation and control of hypersensitivity via induction of anti-inflammatory signaling cascades. RvD1 binds to lipoxin A4/annexin-A1 receptor/formyl-peptide receptor 2 (ALX/FPR2), RvE1 to chemerin receptor 23 (ChemR23). Antinociception of RvD1 is mediated by interaction with transient receptor potential channels ankyrin 1 (TRPA1). Endogenous opioid peptides are synthesized and released from leukocytes in the tissue and bind to opioid receptors on nociceptor terminals. Here, we further explored peripheral mechanisms of RvD1 and chemerin (Chem), the ligand of ChemR23, in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced hindpaw inflammation in male Wistar rats. RvD1 and Chem ameliorated CFA-induced hypersensitivity in early and late inflammatory phases. This was prevented by peripheral blockade of the μ-opioid peptide receptor (MOR) using low dose local naloxone or by local injection of anti-β-endorphin and anti-met-enkephalin (anti-ENK) antibodies. Naloxone also hindered antinociception by the TRPA1 inhibitor HC-030031. RvD1 did not stimulate the release of β-endorphin from macrophages and neutrophils, nor did RvD1 itself activate G-proteins coupled MOR or initiate β-arrestin recruitment to the membrane. TRPA1 blockade by HC-030031 in inflammation in vivo as well as inhibition of the TRPA1-mediated calcium influx in dorsal root ganglia neurons in vitro was hampered by naloxone. Peripheral application of naloxone alone in vivo already lowered mechanical nociceptive thresholds. Therefore, either a perturbation of the balance of endogenous pro- and antinociceptive mechanisms in early and late inflammation, or an interaction of TRPA1 and opioid receptors weaken the antinociceptive potency of RvD1 and TRPA1 blockers.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Mambretti2015, author = {Mambretti, Egle Maria}, title = {Opioid receptors as therapeutic targets for nociceptor specific regional analgesia}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128866}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Opioids have been, since centuries, the gold standard for pain treatment and relief. They exert their effects after binding to opioid receptors (OP) that are expressed and functional in the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). As their systemic application has many side effects, including sedation and respiratory depression, a peripheral application of opioids and selective targeting of µ-OP (MOP) in nociceptive axons would be extremely beneficial. MOP presence and function has been conclusively demonstrated at nerve terminals; however it is still controversial whether functional MOPs are available on the membrane of peripheral nociceptive axons to mediate opioid-induced antinociception. While under pathologic conditions (i.e. nerve injury) exogenous as well as endogenous MOP agonists applied at the damaged nerve can elicit potent antinociception or anti-allodynia, under physiological conditions no antinociception was seen in rats. This could be caused by either a lack of functional opioid receptors in the axonal membranes or by the inability of injected opioids to cross the intact perineurial barrier and to reach nociceptors. Previous behavioral test results showed an antinociceptive effect (up to 5h) following perisciatic application of the hydrophilic DAMGO (MOP agonist) if coinjected with hypertonic saline solution (HTS; 10\% NaCl), a treatment suited to open the perineural barrier. The effect was inhibited by naloxone, a MOP antagonist, documenting its specific action via MOP. Fentanyl, a lipophilic opioid, elicited an effect, which was enhanced by HTS treatment, indicating that HTS may act not only on the barrier but also directly on axonal MOP presence and/or functionality. To provide a basis for testing this hypothesis, the present work was designed to study the axonal localization of MOP in experimental animals under different conditions using molecular and morphological methods. Initially four different commercial antibodies were tested for MOP detection. Immunoreactions with these antibodies specifically detected MOP in the hippocampus and in amygdala, while in the peripheral nervous system the reactions showed varying labeling patterns pointing towards less specificity with low signal-to-noise ratio. Double labelling with calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), a neuropeptide expressed in sensory fibers, with the non-compacted myelin marker S100 or with the neuronal marker PGP9.5 documented significant immunoreaction signals outside sensory nerve fibers. Therefore, none of these antibodies appeared suitable. Taking advantage of a new commercial monoclonal rabbit antibody (RabMAb) and of genetically modified mice in which the fluorescent protein mcherry was inserted in the C-tail of MOP (MOP-mcherry knock-in mice), MOP fusion protein expression in rat and mouse CGRP+ sciatic nerve fibers and fiber bundles was confirmed by immunofluorescence labeling. Immunoelectron microscopic analysis indicated MOP/MOP-mcherry-localization in the cytoplasm and the membranes of unmyelinated axons organized in Remak bundles. Both antibodies detected bands of appropriate size in Western Blot in the CNS and additional larger bands in the PNS. Quantitative analyses 60 min after HTS-treatment revealed no change in MOP mRNA in the sciatic nerve and DRG as well as no change in MOP immunoreactivity in the sciatic nerve. Thus, the opioid-induced long lasting antinociception enhanced by perisciatic injection of HTS were not due to a sustained increased MOP expression or content in sensory, putative nociceptive axons. In summary, the current study succeeded to unequivocally document the presence of MOP protein in intact sensory axons of rat and mouse sciatic nerve. Thus, axonal MOPs may indeed mediate antinociceptive opioid effects observed in behavioral studies in naive animals possibly via activation of potassium or calcium channels. As HTS treatment does not lead to a sustained increase in axonal MOP protein or MOP mRNA expression, other mechanisms might enhance MOP function, including inhibition of MOP recycling or changes in functional coupling. Future studies should further explore the axonal mechanisms of antinociception by opioids and enhancing treatments.}, subject = {Opioide}, language = {en} } @article{DrakopoulosDecker2020, author = {Drakopoulos, Antonios and Decker, Michael}, title = {Development and Biological Applications of Fluorescent Opioid Ligands}, series = {ChemPlusChem}, volume = {85}, journal = {ChemPlusChem}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1002/cplu.202000212}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-216068}, pages = {1354 -- 1364}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Opioid receptors (ORs) are classified among the oldest and best investigated drug targets due to their fundamental role in the treatment of pain and related disorders. ORs are divided in three conventional subtypes (μ, κ, δ) and the non-classical nocicepetin receptor. All ORs are family A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and are located on the cell surface. Modern biophysical methods use light to investigate physiological processes at organismal, cellular and subcellular level. Many of these methods rely on fluorescent ligands, thus highlighting their importance. This review addresses the advancements in the development of opioid fluorescent ligands and their use in biological, pharmacological and imaging applications.}, language = {en} }