@article{AsoHerbOguetaetal.2012,
  author    = {Aso, Yoshinori and Herb, Andrea and Ogueta, Maite and Siwanowicz, Igor and Templier, Thomas and Friedrich, Anja B. and Ito, Kei and Scholz, Henrike and Tanimoto, Hiromu},
  title     = {Three Dopamine Pathways Induce Aversive Odor Memories with Different Stability},
  series = {PLoS Genetics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS Genetics},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1002768},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130631},
  pages     = {e1002768},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Animals acquire predictive values of sensory stimuli through reinforcement. In the brain of Drosophila melanogaster, activation of two types of dopamine neurons in the PAM and PPL1 clusters has been shown to induce aversive odor memory. Here, we identified the third cell type and characterized aversive memories induced by these dopamine neurons. These three dopamine pathways all project to the mushroom body but terminate in the spatially segregated subdomains. To understand the functional difference of these dopamine pathways in electric shock reinforcement, we blocked each one of them during memory acquisition. We found that all three pathways partially contribute to electric shock memory. Notably, the memories mediated by these neurons differed in temporal stability. Furthermore, combinatorial activation of two of these pathways revealed significant interaction of individual memory components rather than their simple summation. These results cast light on a cellular mechanism by which a noxious event induces different dopamine signals to a single brain structure to synthesize an aversive memory.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ElKeredySchleyerKoenigetal.2012,
  author    = {El-Keredy, Amira and Schleyer, Michael and K{\"o}nig, Christian and Ekim, Aslihan and Gerber, Bertram},
  title     = {Behavioural Analyses of Quinine Processing in Choice, Feeding and Learning of Larval Drosophila},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0040525},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130811},
  pages     = {e40525},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Gustatory stimuli can support both immediate reflexive behaviour, such as choice and feeding, and can drive internal reinforcement in associative learning. For larval Drosophila, we here provide a first systematic behavioural analysis of these functions with respect to quinine as a study case of a substance which humans report as "tasting bitter". We describe the dose-effect functions for these different kinds of behaviour and find that a half-maximal effect of quinine to suppress feeding needs substantially higher quinine concentrations (2.0 mM) than is the case for internal reinforcement (0.6 mM). Interestingly, in previous studies (Niewalda et al. 2008, Schipanski et al 2008) we had found the reverse for sodium chloride and fructose/sucrose, such that dose-effect functions for those tastants were shifted towards lower concentrations for feeding as compared to reinforcement, arguing that the differences in dose-effect function between these behaviours do not reflect artefacts of the types of assay used. The current results regarding quinine thus provide a starting point to investigate how the gustatory system is organized on the cellular and/or molecular level to result in different behavioural tuning curves towards a bitter tastant.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NiewaldaVoellerEschbachetal.2011,
  author    = {Niewalda, Thomas and V{\"o}ller, Thomas and Eschbach, Claire and Ehmer, Julia and Wen-Chuang, Chou and Timme, Marc and Fiala, Andr{\´e} and Gerber, Bertram},
  title     = {A Combined Perceptual, Physico-Chemical, and Imaging Approach to 'Odour-Distances' Suggests a Categorizing Function of the Drosophila Antennal Lobe},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0024300},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133510},
  pages     = {e24300},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {How do physico-chemical stimulus features, perception, and physiology relate? Given the multi-layered and parallel architecture of brains, the question specifically is where physiological activity patterns correspond to stimulus features and/or perception. Perceived distances between six odour pairs are defined behaviourally from four independent odour recognition tasks. We find that, in register with the physico-chemical distances of these odours, perceived distances for 3octanol and n-amylacetate are consistently smallest in all four tasks, while the other five odour pairs are about equally distinct. Optical imaging in the antennal lobe, using a calcium sensor transgenically expressed in only first-order sensory or only second-order olfactory projection neurons, reveals that 3-octanol and n-amylacetate are distinctly represented in sensory neurons, but appear merged in projection neurons. These results may suggest that within-antennal lobe processing funnels sensory signals into behaviourally meaningful categories, in register with the physico-chemical relatedness of the odours.},
  language  = {en}
}