@article{Keul2022, author = {Keul, Hildegund}, title = {Vulnerability, vulnerance and resilience — spiritual abuse and sexual violence in new spiritual communities}, series = {Religions}, volume = {13}, journal = {Religions}, number = {5}, issn = {2077-1444}, doi = {10.3390/rel13050425}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-275264}, year = {2022}, abstract = {In February 2017, Braz de Aviz, Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, acknowledged in an interview that some 70 "new spiritual movements" were under investigation for abusive behavior committed by their founders. The number of cases that remain undetected is probably large. This article uses the example of these communities to analyze the precarious tension between vulnerability, vulnerance, and resilience. It draws on C{\´e}line Hoyeau's excellent study of those founders of new spiritual movements in France who were later exposed as abusers. It also presents my research on the sacred in its dangerous connection to the victimizing sacrifice. My basic thesis is that exploring the link between vulnerability and resilience is not enough. Rather, vulnerance needs to be systematically included in the analyses. This new approach opens up a more complex understanding of abuse, cover-ups, and disclosure. It can tackle both the vulnerant resilience of the perpetrators and the voluntary vulnerability of survivors in disclosing abuse.}, language = {en} } @article{FroehlichSassenrathNadjiOhletal.2022, author = {Fr{\"o}hlich, Ellen and Sassenrath, Claudia and Nadji-Ohl, Minou and Unteroberd{\"o}rster, Meike and R{\"u}ckriegel, Stefan and Brelie, Christian von der and Roder, Constantin and Forster, Marie-Therese and Schommer, Stephan and L{\"o}hr, Mario and Pala, Andrej and Goebel, Simone and Mielke, Dorothee and Gerlach, R{\"u}diger and Renovanz, Mirjam and Wirtz, Christian Rainer and Onken, Julia and Czabanka, Marcus and Tatagiba, Marcos Soares and Rohde, Veit and Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo and Vajkoczy, Peter and Gansland, Oliver and Coburger, Jan}, title = {Resilience in lower grade glioma patients}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {14}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {21}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers14215410}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297518}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Current data show that resilience is an important factor in cancer patients' well-being. We aim to explore the resilience of patients with lower grade glioma (LGG) and the potentially influencing factors. We performed a cross-sectional assessment of adult patients with LGG who were enrolled in the LoG-Glio registry. By phone interview, we administered the following measures: Resilience Scale (RS-13), distress thermometer, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test for visually impaired patients (MoCA-Blind), internalized stigmatization by brain tumor (ISBI), Eastern Cooperative Oncological Group performance status (ECOG), patients' perspective questionnaire (PPQ) and typical clinical parameters. We calculated correlations and multivariate regression models. Of 74 patients who were assessed, 38\% of those showed a low level of resilience. Our results revealed significant correlations of resilience with distress (p < 0.001, -0.49), MOCA (p = 0.003, 0.342), ECOG (p < 0.001, -0.602), stigmatization (p < 0.001, -0.558), pain (p < 0.001, -0.524), and occupation (p = 0.007, 0.329). In multivariate analyses, resilience was negatively associated with elevated ECOG (p = 0.020, β = -0.383) and stigmatization levels (p = 0.008, β = -0.350). Occupation showed a tendency towards a significant association with resilience (p = 0.088, β = -0.254). Overall, low resilience affected more than one third of our cohort. Low functional status is a specific risk factor for low resilience. The relevant influence of stigmatization on resilience is a novel finding for patients suffering from a glioma and should be routinely identified and targeted in clinical routine.}, language = {en} }