@article{HahnBeudertGutmannetal.2021,
  author    = {Hahn, Lukas and Beudert, Matthias and Gutmann, Marcus and Keßler, Larissa and Stahlhut, Philipp and Fischer, Lena and Karakaya, Emine and Lorson, Thomas and Thievessen, Ingo and Detsch, Rainer and L{\"u}hmann, Tessa and Luxenhofer, Robert},
  title     = {From Thermogelling Hydrogels toward Functional Bioinks: Controlled Modification and Cytocompatible Crosslinking},
  series = {Macromolecular Bioscience},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Macromolecular Bioscience},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1002/mabi.202100122},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-257542},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Hydrogels are key components in bioink formulations to ensure printability and stability in biofabrication. In this study, a well-known Diels-Alder two-step post-polymerization modification approach is introduced into thermogelling diblock copolymers, comprising poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) and thermoresponsive poly(2-n-propyl-2-oxazine). The diblock copolymers are partially hydrolyzed and subsequently modified by acid/amine coupling with furan and maleimide moieties. While the thermogelling and shear-thinning properties allow excellent printability, trigger-less cell-friendly Diels-Alder click-chemistry yields long-term shape-fidelity. The introduced platform enables easy incorporation of cell-binding moieties (RGD-peptide) for cellular interaction. The hydrogel is functionalized with RGD-peptides using thiol-maleimide chemistry and cell proliferation as well as morphology of fibroblasts seeded on top of the hydrogels confirm the cell adhesion facilitated by the peptides. Finally, bioink formulations are tested for biocompatibility by incorporating fibroblasts homogenously inside the polymer solution pre-printing. After the printing and crosslinking process good cytocompatibility is confirmed. The established bioink system combines a two-step approach by physical precursor gelation followed by an additional chemical stabilization, offering a broad versatility for further biomechanical adaptation or bioresponsive peptide modification.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmidSchmidtHazuretal.2020,
  author    = {Schmid, Rafael and Schmidt, Sonja K. and Hazur, Jonas and Detsch, Rainer and Maurer, Evelyn and Boccaccini, Aldo R. and Hauptstein, Julia and Teßmar, J{\"o}rg and Blunk, Torsten and Schr{\"u}fer, Stefan and Schubert, Dirk W. and Horch, Raymund E. and Bosserhoff, Anja K. and Arkudas, Andreas and Kengelbach-Weigand, Annika},
  title     = {Comparison of hydrogels for the development of well-defined 3D cancer models of breast cancer and melanoma},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers12082320},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-211195},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Bioprinting offers the opportunity to fabricate precise 3D tumor models to study tumor pathophysiology and progression. However, the choice of the bioink used is important. In this study, cell behavior was studied in three mechanically and biologically different hydrogels (alginate, alginate dialdehyde crosslinked with gelatin (ADA-GEL), and thiol-modified hyaluronan (HA-SH crosslinked with PEGDA)) with cells from breast cancer (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) and melanoma (Mel Im and MV3), by analyzing survival, growth, and the amount of metabolically active, living cells via WST-8 labeling. Material characteristics were analyzed by dynamic mechanical analysis. Cell lines revealed significantly increased cell numbers in low-percentage alginate and HA-SH from day 1 to 14, while only Mel Im also revealed an increase in ADA-GEL. MCF-7 showed a preference for 1\% alginate. Melanoma cells tended to proliferate better in ADA-GEL and HA-SH than mammary carcinoma cells. In 1\% alginate, breast cancer cells showed equally good proliferation compared to melanoma cell lines. A smaller area was colonized in high-percentage alginate-based hydrogels. Moreover, 3\% alginate was the stiffest material, and 2.5\% ADA-GEL was the softest material. The other hydrogels were in the same range in between. Therefore, cellular responses were not only stiffness-dependent. With 1\% alginate and HA-SH, we identified matrices that enable proliferation of all tested tumor cell lines while maintaining expected tumor heterogeneity. By adapting hydrogels, differences could be accentuated. This opens up the possibility of understanding and analyzing tumor heterogeneity by biofabrication.},
  language  = {en}
}