@phdthesis{Buechner2014,
  author    = {B{\"u}chner, Claudia Nadine},
  title     = {Single molecule studies of DNA lesion search and recognition strategies},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-111886},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The integrity of our genome is continuously endangered by DNA damaging factors. Several cellular mechanisms have evolved to recognize and remove different types of DNA lesions. Despite the wealth of information on the three-dimensional structure and the catalytic mechanism of DNA repair enzymes, the essential process of target site search and identification remains more elusive. How can a small number of repair proteins find and detect the rare sites of damage rapidly and efficiently over an excess of millions of undamaged bases? To address this pivotal question in DNA repair, I focused on the central players from the two DNA damage excision repair pathways in my studies: nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER). As examples for completely different approaches of damage search, recognition and verification, I compared the NER protein Xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) with the BER proteins human thymine DNA glycosylase (hTDG) and human 8-oxoguanine glycosylase (hOgg1). In particular, the single molecule approach of atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging and complementary biochemical and biophysical techniques were applied. I established a simple, optimized preparation approach, which yields homogeneous and pure samples of long (several hundreds to thousands of base pairs) DNA substrates suitable for the AFM studies with DNA repair proteins. Via this sample preparation, a single target site of interest can be introduced into DNA at a known position, which allows separate analysis of specific protein-DNA complexes bound to the lesion site and nonspecific complexes bound to non-damaged DNA. The first part of the thesis investigates the XPD protein involved in eukaryotic NER. In general, the NER mechanism removes helix-distorting lesions - carcinogenic UV light induced photoproducts, such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) as well as bulky DNA adducts. The 5'-3' helicase XPD has been proposed to be one of the key players in DNA damage verification in eukaryotic NER, which is still a matter of hot debate. In the studies, I focused on XPD from the archaeal species Thermoplasma acidophilum (taXPD), which shares a relatively high sequence homology with the sequence of the human protein and may serve as a good model for its eukaryotic counterpart. Based on AFM experiments and accompanying DNA binding affinity measurements with the biosensor technology Biolayer Interferometry (BLI), a clear role of XPD in damage verification was deciphered. Specifically, the data suggested that the ATP-dependent 5'-3' helicase activity of XPD was blocked by the presence of damage leading to stalled XPD-DNA damage verification complexes at the lesion sites. Successful damage verification led to ATP-dependent conformational changes visible by a significant transition in DNA bend angles from ~ 50° to ~ 65° at the site of the bound protein. Remarkably, this DNA bend angle shift was observed both in the presence of ATP and ATPγs (non-hydrolyzable ATP analog) indicating that ATP-binding instead of ATP hydrolysis was sufficient to induce repair competent conformational changes of XPD. Most importantly, detailed protein binding position and DNA bend angle analyses revealed for the first time that XPD preferably recognizes a bulky fluorescein lesion on the translocated strand, whereas a CPD lesion is preferentially detected on the opposite, non-translocated strand. Despite the different recognition strategies for both types of damages, they share a common verification complex conformation, which may serve as a signal for the recruitment of further NER factors. In the second part of the thesis, AFM imaging and a 2-Aminopurine fluorescence-based base-flipping assay were combined to investigate damage search and recognition by DNA glycosylases in BER. Exemplarily, I chose to study hTDG as a representative of the vast glycosylase family. hTDG excises thymine and uracil from mutagenic G:T and G:U mispairs contributing to cancer and genetic disease. The AFM data suggested that hTDG uses the intrinsic flexibility of G:T and G:U wobble pairs for initial damage sensing, while scanning DNA as a search complex (SC, slightly bent DNA). Remarkably, hTDG has been indicated to continuously switch between the search and interrogation conformation (IC, stronger bent DNA) during damage search. In the IC, target bases are interrogated by extrahelical base flipping, which is facilitated by protein-induced DNA bending and enhanced DNA flexibility at mismatches. AFM and fluorescence analyses revealed that the flipped base is stabilized via hTDG's arginine finger. Correct target bases are perfectly stabilized within the enzyme's catalytic pocket resulting in prolonged residence time and enhanced excision probability. To test for the generalizability of the proposed hTDG damage search model to BER glycosylases, identical studies were performed with a second glycosylase, hOgg1. The data on hOgg1, which removes structurally more stable 8-oxoguanine lesions, supported the hypothesis developed for lesion recognition by hTDG as a common strategy employed by BER glycosylases},
  subject      = {Rasterionenmikroskop},
  language  = {en}
}