@phdthesis{Iltzsche2017, author = {Iltzsche, Fabian}, title = {The Role of DREAM/MMB-mediated mitotic gene expression downstream of mutated K-Ras in lung cancer}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-154108}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The evolutionary conserved Myb-MuvB (MMB) multiprotein complex has an essential role in transcriptional activation of mitotic genes. MMB target genes as well as the MMB associated transcription factor B-Myb and FoxM1 are highly expressed in a range of different cancer types. The elevated expression of these genes correlates with an advanced tumor state and a poor prognosis. This suggests that MMB could contribute to tumorigenesis by mediating overexpression of mitotic genes. Although MMB has been extensively characterized biochemically, the requirement for MMB to tumorigenesis in vivo remains largely unknown and has not been tested directly so far. In this study, conditional knockout of the MMB core member Lin9 inhibits tumor formation in vivo in a mouse model of lung cancer driven by oncogenic K-Ras and loss of p53. The incomplete recombination observed within tumors points towards an enormous selection pressure against the complete loss of Lin9. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated depletion of Lin9 or the MMB associated subunit B-Myb provides evidence that MMB is required for the expression of mitotic genes in lung cancer cells. Moreover, it was demonstrated that proliferation of lung cancer cells strongly depends on MMB. Furthermore, in this study, the relationship of MMB to the p53 tumor suppressor was investigated in a primary lung cancer cell line with restorable p53 function. Expression analysis revealed that mitotic genes are downregulated after p53 re-expression. Moreover, activation of p53 induces formation of the repressive DREAM complex and results in enrichment of DREAM at mitotic gene promoters. Conversely, MMB is displaced at these promoters. Based on these findings the following model is proposed: In p53-negative cells, mitogenic stimuli foster the switch from DREAM to MMB. Thus, mitotic genes are overexpressed and may promote chromosomal instability and tumorigenesis. This study provides evidence that MMB contributes to the upregulation of G2/M phase-specific genes in p53-negative cells and suggests that inhibition of MMB (or its target genes) might be a strategy for treatment of lung cancer.}, subject = {Nicht-kleinzelliges Bronchialkarzinom (NSCLC)}, language = {en} } @article{KunzGoettlichWallesetal.2017, author = {Kunz, Meik and G{\"o}ttlich, Claudia and Walles, Thorsten and Nietzer, Sarah and Dandekar, Gudrun and Dandekar, Thomas}, title = {MicroRNA-21 versus microRNA-34: Lung cancer promoting and inhibitory microRNAs analysed in silico and in vitro and their clinical impact}, series = {Tumor Biology}, volume = {39}, journal = {Tumor Biology}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1177/1010428317706430}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158399}, year = {2017}, abstract = {MicroRNAs are well-known strong RNA regulators modulating whole functional units in complex signaling networks. Regarding clinical application, they have potential as biomarkers for prognosis, diagnosis, and therapy. In this review, we focus on two microRNAs centrally involved in lung cancer progression. MicroRNA-21 promotes and microRNA-34 inhibits cancer progression. We elucidate here involved pathways and imbed these antagonistic microRNAs in a network of interactions, stressing their cancer microRNA biology, followed by experimental and bioinformatics analysis of such microRNAs and their targets. This background is then illuminated from a clinical perspective on microRNA-21 and microRNA-34 as general examples for the complex microRNA biology in lung cancer and its diagnostic value. Moreover, we discuss the immense potential that microRNAs such as microRNA-21 and microRNA-34 imply by their broad regulatory effects. These should be explored for novel therapeutic strategies in the clinic.}, language = {en} }