@phdthesis{Herbst2018,
  author    = {Herbst, Nikolas Roman},
  title     = {Methods and Benchmarks for Auto-Scaling Mechanisms in Elastic Cloud Environments},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164314},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {A key functionality of cloud systems are automated resource management mechanisms at the infrastructure level. As part of this, elastic scaling of allocated resources is realized by so-called auto-scalers that are supposed to match the current demand in a way that the performance remains stable while resources are efficiently used. The process of rating cloud infrastructure offerings in terms of the quality of their achieved elastic scaling remains undefined. Clear guidance for the selection and configuration of an auto-scaler for a given context is not available. Thus, existing operating solutions are optimized in a highly application specific way and usually kept undisclosed. The common state of practice is the use of simplistic threshold-based approaches. Due to their reactive nature they incur performance degradation during the minutes of provisioning delays. In the literature, a high-number of auto-scalers has been proposed trying to overcome the limitations of reactive mechanisms by employing proactive prediction methods. In this thesis, we identify potentials in automated cloud system resource management and its evaluation methodology. Specifically, we make the following contributions: We propose a descriptive load profile modeling framework together with automated model extraction from recorded traces to enable reproducible workload generation with realistic load intensity variations. The proposed Descartes Load Intensity Model (DLIM) with its Limbo framework provides key functionality to stress and benchmark resource management approaches in a representative and fair manner. We propose a set of intuitive metrics for quantifying timing, stability and accuracy aspects of elasticity. Based on these metrics, we propose a novel approach for benchmarking the elasticity of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud platforms independent of the performance exhibited by the provisioned underlying resources. We tackle the challenge of reducing the risk of relying on a single proactive auto-scaler by proposing a new self-aware auto-scaling mechanism, called Chameleon, combining multiple different proactive methods coupled with a reactive fallback mechanism. Chameleon employs on-demand, automated time series-based forecasting methods to predict the arriving load intensity in combination with run-time service demand estimation techniques to calculate the required resource consumption per work unit without the need for a detailed application instrumentation. It can also leverage application knowledge by solving product-form queueing networks used to derive optimized scaling actions. The Chameleon approach is first in resolving conflicts between reactive and proactive scaling decisions in an intelligent way. We are confident that the contributions of this thesis will have a long-term impact on the way cloud resource management approaches are assessed. While this could result in an improved quality of autonomic management algorithms, we see and discuss arising challenges for future research in cloud resource management and its assessment methods: The adoption of containerization on top of virtual machine instances introduces another level of indirection. As a result, the nesting of virtual resources increases resource fragmentation and causes unreliable provisioning delays. Furthermore, virtualized compute resources tend to become more and more inhomogeneous associated with various priorities and trade-offs. Due to DevOps practices, cloud hosted service updates are released with a higher frequency which impacts the dynamics in user behavior.},
  subject      = {Cloud Computing},
  language  = {en}
}