@article{HelassGreinacherGoetzetal.2022,
  author    = {Helaß, Madeleine and Greinacher, Anja and G{\"o}tz, Sebastian and M{\"u}ller, Andreas and G{\"u}ndel, Harald and Junne, Florian and Nikendei, Christoph and Maatouk, Imad},
  title     = {Age stereotypes towards younger and older colleagues in registered nurses and supervisors in a university hospital: A generic qualitative study},
  series = {Journal of Advanced Nursing},
  volume    = {78},
  journal   = {Journal of Advanced Nursing},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1111/jan.15021},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262751},
  pages     = {471 -- 485},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Aim This study aimed to identify and compare age stereotypes of registered nurses and supervisors in clinical inpatient settings. Design Generic qualitative study using half-standardized interviews. Method Nineteen face-to-face interviews and five focus groups (N = 50) were conducted with nurses of varying levels at a hospital of maximum medical care in Germany between August and November 2018 and were subjected to structured qualitative content analysis. Results Reflecting the ageing process and cooperation in mixed-age teams, nursing staff and supervisors defined similar age stereotypes towards older and younger nurses reminiscent of common generational labels 'Baby Boomers' and Generations X. Their evaluation created an inconsistent and contradictory pattern differing to the respective work context and goals. Age stereotypes were described as both potentially beneficial and detrimental for the individual and the cooperation in the team. If a successfully implemented diversity management focuses age stereotypes, negative assumptions can be reduced and cooperation in mixed-age teams can be considered beneficial. Conclusion Diversity management as measures against age stereotypes and for mutual acceptance and understanding should include staff from various hierarchical levels of the inpatient setting.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrishnaPeter2018,
  author    = {Krishna, Anand and Peter, Sebastian M.},
  title     = {Questionable research practices in student final theses - prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0203470},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177296},
  pages     = {e0203470},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Although questionable research practices (QRPs) and p-hacking have received attention in recent years, little research has focused on their prevalence and acceptance in students. Students are the researchers of the future and will represent the field in the future. Therefore, they should not be learning to use and accept QRPs, which would reduce their ability to produce and evaluate meaningful research. 207 psychology students and fresh graduates provided self-report data on the prevalence and predictors of QRPs. Attitudes towards QRPs, belief that significant results constitute better science or lead to better grades, motivation, and stress levels were predictors. Furthermore, we assessed perceived supervisor attitudes towards QRPs as an important predictive factor. The results were in line with estimates of QRP prevalence from academia. The best predictor of QRP use was students' QRP attitudes. Perceived supervisor attitudes exerted both a direct and indirect effect via student attitudes. Motivation to write a good thesis was a protective factor, whereas stress had no effect. Students in this sample did not subscribe to beliefs that significant results were better for science or their grades. Such beliefs further did not impact QRP attitudes or use in this sample. Finally, students engaged in more QRPs pertaining to reporting and analysis than those pertaining to study design. We conclude that supervisors have an important function in shaping students' attitudes towards QRPs and can improve their research practices by motivating them well. Furthermore, this research provides some impetus towards identifying predictors of QRP use in academia.},
  language  = {en}
}