@article{AndreskaLueningschroerWolfetal.2023,
  author    = {Andreska, Thomas and L{\"u}ningschr{\"o}r, Patrick and Wolf, Daniel and McFleder, Rhonda L. and Ayon-Olivas, Maurilyn and Rattka, Marta and Drechsler, Christine and Perschin, Veronika and Blum, Robert and Aufmkolk, Sarah and Granado, Noelia and Moratalla, Rosario and Sauer, Markus and Monoranu, Camelia and Volkmann, Jens and Ip, Chi Wang and Stigloher, Christian and Sendtner, Michael},
  title     = {DRD1 signaling modulates TrkB turnover and BDNF sensitivity in direct pathway striatal medium spiny neurons},
  series = {Cell Reports},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Cell Reports},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112575},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-349932},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Highlights • Dopamine receptor-1 activation induces TrkB cell-surface expression in striatal neurons • Dopaminergic deficits cause TrkB accumulation and clustering in the ER • TrkB clusters colocalize with cargo receptor SORCS-2 in direct pathway striatal neurons • Intracellular TrkB clusters fail to fuse with lysosomes after dopamine depletion Summary Disturbed motor control is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD). Cortico-striatal synapses play a central role in motor learning and adaption, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) from cortico-striatal afferents modulates their plasticity via TrkB in striatal medium spiny projection neurons (SPNs). We studied the role of dopamine in modulating the sensitivity of direct pathway SPNs (dSPNs) to BDNF in cultures of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-enriched D1-expressing SPNs and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-treated rats. DRD1 activation causes enhanced TrkB translocation to the cell surface and increased sensitivity for BDNF. In contrast, dopamine depletion in cultured dSPN neurons, 6-OHDA-treated rats, and postmortem brain of patients with PD reduces BDNF responsiveness and causes formation of intracellular TrkB clusters. These clusters associate with sortilin related VPS10 domain containing receptor 2 (SORCS-2) in multivesicular-like structures, which apparently protects them from lysosomal degradation. Thus, impaired TrkB processing might contribute to disturbed motor function in PD.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NguemeniStiehlHiewetal.2021,
  author    = {Nguemeni, Carine and Stiehl, Annika and Hiew, Shawn and Zeller, Daniel},
  title     = {No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task},
  series = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  issn      = {1662-5161},
  doi       = {10.3389/fnhum.2021.631517},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-225477},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Recently, attention has grown toward cerebellar neuromodulation in motor learning using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). An important point of discussion regarding this modulation is the optimal timing of tDCS, as this parameter could significantly influence the outcome. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effects of the timing of cerebellar anodal tDCS (ca-tDCS) on motor learning using a sequential finger-tapping task (FTT). Methods: One hundred and twenty two healthy young, right-handed subjects (96 females) were randomized into four groups (During\(_{sham}\), Before, During\(_{real}\), After). They performed 2 days of FTT with their non-dominant hand on a custom keyboard. The task consisted of 40 s of typing followed by 20 s rest. Each participant received ca-tDCS (2 mA, sponge electrodes of 25 cm\(^{2}\), 20 min) at the appropriate timing and performed 20 trials on the first day (T1, 20 min). On the following day, only 10 trials of FTT were performed without tDCS (T2, 10 min). Motor skill performance and retention were assessed. Results: All participants showed a time-dependent increase in learning. Motor performance was not different between groups at the end of T1 (p = 0.59). ca-tDCS did not facilitate the retention of the motor skill in the FTT at T2 (p = 0.27). Thus, our findings indicate an absence of the effect of ca-tDCS on motor performance or retention of the FTT independently from the timing of stimulation. Conclusion: The present results suggest that the outcome of ca-tDCS is highly dependent on the task and stimulation parameters. Future studies need to establish a clear basis for the successful and reproducible clinical application of ca-tDCS.},
  language  = {en}
}