@article{HessMengSchulteetal.2020,
  author    = {Heß, Verena and Meng, Karin and Schulte, Thomas and Neuderth, Silke and Bengel, J{\"u}rgen and Faller, Hermann and Schuler, Michael},
  title     = {Prevalence and predictors of cancer patients' unexpressed needs in the admission interview of inpatient rehabilitation},
  series = {Psycho-Oncology},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Psycho-Oncology},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1002/pon.5450},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228369},
  pages     = {1549 -- 1556},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Objective The admission interview in oncological inpatient rehabilitation might be a good opportunity to identify cancer patients' needs present after acute treatment. However, a relevant number of patients may not express their needs. In this study, we examined (a) the proportion of cancer patients with unexpressed needs, (b) topics of unexpressed needs and reasons for not expressing needs, (c) correlations of not expressing needs with several patient characteristics, and (d) predictors of not expressing needs. Methods We enrolled 449 patients with breast, prostate, and colon cancer at beginning and end of inpatient rehabilitation. We obtained self-reports about unexpressed needs and health-related variables (quality of life, depression, anxiety, adjustment disorder, and health literacy). We estimated frequencies and conducted correlation and ordinal logistic regression analyses. Results A quarter of patients stated they had "rather not" or "not at all" expressed all relevant needs. Patients mostly omitted fear of cancer recurrence. Most frequent reasons for not expressing needs were being focused on physical consequences of cancer, concerns emerging only later, and not knowing about the possibility of talking about distress. Not expressing needs was associated with several health-related outcomes, for example, emotional functioning, adjustment disorder, fear of progression, and health literacy. Depression measured at the beginning of rehabilitation showed only small correlations and is therefore not sufficient to identify patients with unexpressed needs. Conclusions A relevant proportion of cancer patients reported unexpressed needs in the admission interview. This was associated with decreased mental health. Therefore, it seems necessary to support patients in expressing needs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EsserMehnert‐TheuerkaufFriedrichetal.2020,
  author    = {Esser, Peter and Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja and Friedrich, Michael and Johansen, Christoffer and Br{\"a}hler, Elmar and Faller, Hermann and H{\"a}rter, Martin and Koch, Uwe and Schulz, Holger and Wegscheider, Karl and Weis, Joachim and Kuba, Katharina and Hinz, Andreas and Hartung, Tim},
  title     = {Risk and associated factors of depression and anxiety in men with prostate cancer: Results from a German multicenter study},
  series = {Psycho-Oncology},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Psycho-Oncology},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1002/pon.5471},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218277},
  pages     = {1604 -- 1612},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Objective In order to optimize psycho-oncological care, studies that quantify the extent of distress and identify certain risk groups are needed. Among patients with prostate cancer (PCa), findings on depression and anxiety are limited. Methods We analyzed data of PCa patients selected from a German multi-center study. Depression and anxiety were assessed with the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 (cut-off ≥7). We provided physical symptom burden, calculated absolute and relative risk (AR and RR) of depression and anxiety across patient subsets and between patients and the general population (GP) and tested age as a moderator within the relationship of disease-specific symptoms with depression and anxiety. Results Among 636 participants, the majority reported disease-specific problems (sexuality: 60\%; urination: 52\%). AR for depression and anxiety was 23\% and 22\%, respectively. Significant RR were small, with higher risks of distress in patients who are younger (eg, RR\(_{depression}\) = 1.15; 95\%-CI: 1.06-1.26), treated with chemotherapy (RR\(_{depression}\)n = 1.46; 95\%-CI: 1.09-1.96) or having metastases (RR\(_{depression}\) = 1.30; 95\%-CI: 1.02-1.65). Risk of distress was slightly elevated compared to GP (eg, RR\(_{depression}\) = 1.13; 95\%-CI: 1.07-1.19). Age moderated the relationship between symptoms and anxiety (B\(_{urination}\) = -0.10, P = .02; B\(_{sexuality}\) = -0.11, P = .01). Conclusions Younger patients, those with metastases or treatment with chemotherapy seem to be at elevated risk for distress and should be closely monitored. Many patients suffer from disease-specific symptom burden, by which younger patients seem to be particularly distressed. Support of coping mechanisms associated with disease-specific symptom burden seems warranted.},
  language  = {en}
}