@phdthesis{Chouhan2017,
  author    = {Chouhan, Nitin Singh},
  title     = {Time-odor learning in \(Drosophila\) \(melanogaster\)},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145675},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Endogenous clocks help animals to anticipate the daily environmental changes. These internal clocks rely on environmental cues, called Zeitgeber, for synchronization. The molecular clock consists of transcription-translation feedback loops and is located in about 150 neurons (Helfrich-F{\"o}rster and Homberg, 1993; Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, 2005). The core clock has the proteins Clock (CLK) and Cycle (CYC) that together act as a transcription activator for period (per) and timeless (tim) which then, via PER and TIM block their own transcription by inhibiting CLK/CYC activity (Darlington et al., 1998; Hardin, 2005; Dubruille and Emery, 2008). Light signals trigger the degradation of TIM through a blue-light sensing protein Cryptochrome (CRY) and thus, allows CLK/CYC to resume per and tim transcription (Emery et al., 1998; Stanewsky et al., 1998). Therefore, light acts as an important Zeitgeber for the clock entrainment. The mammalian clock consists of similarly intertwined feedback loops. Endogenous clocks facilitate appropriate alterations in a variety of behaviors according to the time of day. Also, these clocks can provide the phase information to the memory centers of the brain to form the time of day related associations (TOD). TOD memories promote appropriate usage of resources and concurrently better the survival success of an animal. For instance, animals can form time-place associations related to the availability of a biologically significant stimulus like food or mate. Such memories will help the animal to obtain resources at different locations at the appropriate time of day. The significance of these memories is supported by the fact that many organisms including bees, ants, rats and mice demonstrate time-place learning (Biebach et al. 1991; Mistlberger et al. 1997; Van der Zee et al. 2008; Wenger et al. 1991). Previous studies have shown that TOD related memories rely on an internal clock, but the identity of the clock and the underlying mechanism remain less well understood. The present study demonstrates that flies can also form TOD associated odor memories and further seeks to identify the appropriate mechanism. Hungry flies were trained in the morning to associate odor A with the sucrose reward and subsequently were exposed to odor B without reward. The same flies were exposed in the afternoon to odor B with and odor A without reward. Two cycles of the 65 reversal training on two subsequent days resulted in the significant retrieval of specific odor memories in the morning and afternoon tests. Therefore, flies were able to modulate their odor preference according to the time of day. In contrast, flies trained in a non-reversal manner were unable to form TOD related memories. The study also demonstrates that flies are only able to form time-odor memories when the two reciprocal training cycles occur at a minimum 6 h interval. This work also highlights the role of the internal state of flies in establishing timeodor memories. Prolonged starvation motivates flies to appropriate their search for the food. It increases the cost associated with a wrong choice in the T-maze test as it precludes the food discovery. Accordingly, an extended starvation promotes the TOD related changes in the odor preference in flies already with a single cycle of reversal training. Intriguingly, prolonged starvation is required for the time-odor memory acquisition but is dispensable during the memory retrieval. Endogenous oscillators promote time-odor associations in flies. Flies in constant darkness have functional rhythms and can form time-odor memories. In contrast, flies kept in constant light become arrhythmic and demonstrated no change in their odor preference through the day. Also, clock mutant flies per01 and clkAR, show compromised performance compared to CS flies when trained in the time-odor conditioning assay. These results suggest that flies need a per and clk dependent oscillator for establishing TOD related memories. Also, the clock governed rhythms are necessary for the timeodor memory acquisition but not for the retrieval. Pigment-Dispersing Factor (PDF) neuropeptide is a clock output factor (Park and Hall, 1998; Park et al., 2000; Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, 2009). pdf01 mutant flies are unable to form significant time-odor memories. PDF is released by 8 neurons per hemisphere in the fly brain. This cluster includes the small (s-LNvs) and large (l-LNvs) ventral lateral neurons. Restoring PDF in these 16 neurons in the pdf01 mutant background rescues the time-odor learning defect. The PDF neuropeptide activates a seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor (PDFR) which is broadly expressed in the fly brain (Hyun et al., 2005). The present study shows that the expression of PDFR in about 10 dorsal neurons (DN1p) is sufficient for robust time-odor associations in flies. 66 In conclusion, flies use distinct endogenous oscillators to acquire and retrieve time-odor memories. The first oscillator is light dependent and likely signals through the PDF neuropeptide to promote the usage of the time as an associative cue during appetitive conditioning. In contrast, the second clock is light independent and specifically signals the time information for the memory retrieval. The identity of this clock and the underlying mechanism are open to investigation.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Batsching2016,
  author    = {Batsching, Sophie Johanna},
  title     = {Behavior under uncontrollable stress in \(Drosophila\) \(melanogaster\) - Learned Helplessness revisited},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145416},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {In order to select the appropriate behavior, it is important to choose the right behavior at the right time out of many options. It still remains unclear nowadays how exactly this is managed. To address this question, I expose flies (Drosophila melanogaster) to uncontrollable stress to study their behavior under restrictive circumstances by using the so-called shock box. Exposing animals to uncontrollable stress may have an impact on subsequent behavior and can last for some time. The animal learns that whatever it does, it cannot change the situation and therefore can develop something called learned helplessness. The term was first conceptualized by two American psychologists Maier and Seligman (1967), who discovered this phenomenon while doing experiments with dogs. They found out that dogs which are exposed to inescapable stress, later fail in a learning task ('shuttle box'). In this work the walking patterns of three different types of experimental flies, walking in a small dark chamber, were evaluated. Using the triadic design (Seligman and Maier, 1967), flies were either exposed to electric shock randomly (yoked), could turn it off by being active (master) or did not receive punishment at all (control). Master flies were shocked whenever they sat for more than 0.9 seconds. At the same time yoked flies received a shock as well independent of what they were doing, to ensure the same amount of shocks received and to create random punishment pattern for the yoked group. With this so-called no-idleness paradigm flies were conditioned either 10 minutes, which resulted in a short (3 minutes) after-effect, or 20 minutes that turned out to be more stable (10 minutes). In a second part, the behavior during the 20 minute conditioning and a 10 minutes post-test was described in detail. Female flies of the yoked group developed lower activity levels, longer pauses and walked more slowly than master and control flies during conditioning. In the time after the shocks while still in the box, the yoked flies also reduced the frequency and duration of walking bouts as well as their walking speed. Additionally, they took more time to resume walking after the onset of an electric shock than master flies (escape latency) and turned out to make less pauses lasting between 1-1.5 seconds which supports the finding concerning the escape latency. Male flies, tested under the same conditions, showed a slightly weaker after-effect regarding the difference between master and yoked during conditioning and post-test when compared to female flies. When comparing the 20 minutes conditioning with subsequent 10 minutes test in the heat and the shock box in parallel, one finds the same effect: Flies which do not have control over the shocks, lower their activity, make less but longer pauses and walk more slowly than their respective master flies. Despite the similar effect of heat and shock on the flies, some differences between the devices occurred, which can partly be explained by different humidity conditions as well as by different surfaces within the chambers. When the control over the shocks is given back to the yoked flies, it takes them about seven minutes to realize it. One could also show that dopamine levels in the brain were reduced in comparison to flies which did not receive shocks. Yoked flies also were impaired in a place learning task (place learning) and their reaction to light (exit from the box towards the light) directly after conditioning. After characterizing the walking behavior in the chambers, the study deals with the question whether the effects observed in the chambers transfer to different environments. In free walk they only differed from flies which did not receive electric shocks and no effect of uncontrollability was transferred to courtship behavior. Handling as the cause could be excluded. Since handling could be exclude to be the cause of losing the effect, I assumed that the behavior shown in the boxes are context depend. Not only were the after-effects of inescapable shock subject of the current research also the impact of the rearing situation on the response to electric shock was investigated in the present study. Flies which grew up in a single-reared situation turned out to be less affected by inescapable stress in both sexes. In the next part, the first steps to unravel the neuronal underpinning were taken. A mutant - fumin - which is defective in the dopamine re-uptake transporter showed less reaction to inescapable foot shocks, while a mutant for the gene which encodes an adenylate cyclase (rutabaga2080) resulted in a good score during conditioning, but showed no stable after-effect. Downregulating the expression of the adenylate cyclase gene (rutabaga) in different parts of the mushroom bodies showed, that rutabaga is necessary in the α'β'-lobes for expressing the differences between master and yoked flies in the no-idleness paradigm. The study further confirmed previous findings, that rutabaga is needed in operant but not in classical conditioning. As a result, the study could show that not the stimulus itself causes the state of uncontrollability but the fact that the fly learned that it was not in control of the stimulus. This state turned out to be context and time dependent.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Andlauer2013,
  author    = {Andlauer, Till Felix Malte},
  title     = {Structural and Functional Diversity of Synapses in the Drosophila CNS},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85018},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Large-scale anatomical and functional analyses of the connectivity in both invertebrate and mammalian brains have gained intense attention in recent years. At the same time, the understanding of synapses on a molecular level still lacks behind. We have only begun to unravel the basic mechanisms of how the most important synaptic proteins regulate release and reception of neurotransmitter molecules, as well as changes of synaptic strength. Furthermore, little is known regarding the stoichiometry of presynaptic proteins at different synapses within an organism. An assessment of these characteristics would certainly promote our comprehension of the properties of different synapse types. Presynaptic proteins directly influence, for example, the probability of neurotransmitter release as well as mechanisms for short-term plasticity. We have examined the strength of expression of several presynaptic proteins at different synapse types in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster using immunohistochemistry. Clear differences in the relative abundances of the proteins were obvious on different levels: variations in staining intensities appeared from the neuropil to the synaptic level. In order to quantify these differences, we have developed a ratiometric analysis of antibody stainings. By application of this ratiometric method, we could assign average ratios of presynaptic proteins to different synapse populations in two central relays of the olfactory pathway. In this manner, synapse types could be characterized by distinct fingerprints of presynaptic protein ratios. Subsequently, we used the method for the analysis of aberrant situations: we reduced levels of Bruchpilot, a major presynaptic protein, and ablated different synapse or cell types. Evoked changes of ratio fingerprints were proportional to the modifications we had induced in the system. Thus, such ratio signatures are well suited for the characterization of synapses. In order to contribute to our understanding of both the molecular composition and the function of synapses, we also characterized a novel synaptic protein. This protein, Drep-2, is a member of the Dff family of regulators of apoptosis. We generated drep-2 mutants, which did not show an obvious misregulation of apoptosis. By contrast, Drep-2 was found to be a neuronal protein, highly enriched for example at postsynaptic receptor fields of the input synapses of the major learning centre of insects, the mushroom bodies. Flies mutant for drep-2 were viable but lived shorter than wildtypes. Basic synaptic transmission at both peripheral and central synapses was in normal ranges. However, drep-2 mutants showed a number of deficiencies in adaptive behaviours: adult flies were locomotor hyperactive and hypersensitive towards ethanol-induced sedation. Moreover, the mutant animals were heavily impaired in associative learning. In aversive olfactory conditioning, drep-2 mutants formed neither short-term nor anaesthesia-sensitive memories. We could demonstrate that Drep-2 is required in mushroom body intrinsic neurons for normal olfactory learning. Furthermore, odour-evoked calcium transients in these neurons, a prerequisite for learning, were reduced in drep-2 mutants. The impairment of the mutants in olfactory learning could be fully rescued by pharmacological application of an agonist to metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Quantitative mass spectrometry of Drep-2 complexes revealed that the protein is associated with a large number of translational repressors, among them the fragile X mental retardation protein FMRP. FMRP inhibits mGluR-mediated protein synthesis. Lack of this protein causes the fragile X syndrome, which constitutes the most frequent monogenic cause of autism. Examination of the performance of drep-2 mutants in courtship conditioning showed that the animals were deficient in both short- and long-term memory. Drep-2 mutants share these phenotypes with fmrp and mGluR mutants. Interestingly, drep-2; fmrp double mutants exhibited normal memory. Thus, we propose a model in which Drep-2 antagonizes FMRP in the regulation of mGluR-dependent protein synthesis. Our hypothesis is supported by the observation that impairments in synaptic plasticity can arise if mGluR signalling is imbalanced in either direction. We suggest that Drep-2 helps in establishing this balance.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Sareen2011,
  author    = {Sareen, Preeti},
  title     = {Visual attention in Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-69616},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {There is such vast amount of visual information in our surroundings at any time that filtering out the important information for further processing is a basic requirement for any visual system. This is accomplished by deploying attention to focus on one source of sensory inputs to the exclusion of others (Luck and Mangun 2009). Attention has been studied extensively in humans and non human primates (NHPs). In Drosophila, visual attention was first demonstrated in 1980 (Wolf and Heisenberg 1980) but this field remained largely unexplored until recently. Lately, however, studies have emerged that hypothesize the role of attention in several behaviors but do not specify the characteristic properties of attention. So, the aim of this research was to characterize the phenomenon of visual attention in wild-type Drosophila, including both externally cued and covert attention using tethered flight at a torque meter. Development of systematic quantifiable behavioral tests was a key aspect for this which was not only important for analyzing the behavior of a population of wild-type flies but also for comparing the wild-type flies with mutant flies. The latter would help understand the molecular, genetic, and neuronal bases of attention. Since Drosophila provides handy genetic tools, a model of attention in Drosophila will serve to the greater questions about the neuronal circuitry and mechanisms involved which might be analogous to those in primates. Such a model might later be used in research involving disorders of attention. Attention can be guided to a certain location in the visual field by the use of external cues. Here, using visual cues the attention of the fly was directed to one or the other of the two visual half-fields. A simple yet robust paradigm was designed with which the results were easily quantifiable. This paradigm helped discover several interesting properties of the cued attention, the most substantial one being that this kind of external guidance of attention is restricted to the lower part of the fly's visual field. The guiding cue had an after-effect, i.e. it could occur at least up to 2 seconds before the test and still bias it. The cue could also be spatially separated from the test by at least 20° and yet attract the attention although the extent of the focus of attention (FoA) was smaller than one lower visual half-field. These observations excluded the possibility of any kind of interference between the test and the cue stimuli. Another interesting observation was the essentiality of continuous visibility of the test stimulus but not the cue for effective cuing. When the contrast of the visual scene was inverted, differences in response frequencies and cuing effects were observed. Syndirectional yaw torque responses became more frequent than the antidirectional responses and cuing was no longer effective in the lower visual field with inverted contrast. Interestingly, the test stimulus with simultaneous displacement of two stripes not only effectuated a phasic yaw torque response but also a landing response. A 50 landing response was produced in more than half of the cases whenever a yaw torque response was produced. Elucidation of the neuronal correlates of the cued attention was commenced. Pilot experiments with hydroxyurea (HU) treated flies showed that mushroom bodies were not required for the kind of guidance of attention tested in this study. Dopamine mutants were also tested for the guidance of attention in the lower visual field. Surprisingly, TH-Gal4/UAS-shits1 flies flew like wild-type flies and also showed normal optomotor response during the initial calibration phase of the experiment but did not show any phasic yaw torque or landing response at 18 °C, 25 °C or 30 °C. dumb2 flies that have almost no D1 dopamine receptor dDA1 expression in the mushroom bodies and the central complex (Kim et al. 2007) were also tested and like THGal4/ UAS-shits1 flies did not show any phasic yaw torque or landing response. Since the dopamine mutants did not show the basic yaw torque response for the test the role of dopamine in attention could not be deduced. A different paradigm would be needed to test these mutants. Not only can attention be guided through external cues, it can also be shifted endogenously (covert attention). Experiments with the windows having oscillating stripes nicely demonstrated the phenomenon of covert attention due to the production of a characteristic yaw torque pattern by the flies. However, the results were not easily quantifiable and reproducible thereby calling for a more systematic approach. Experiments with simultaneous opposing displacements of two stripes provide a promising avenue as the results from these experiments showed that the flies had a higher tendency to deliver one type of response than when the responses would be produced stochastically suggesting that attention increased this tendency. Further experiments and analysis of such experiments could shed more light on the mechanisms of covert attention in flies.},
  subject      = {Visuelle Aufmerksamkeit},
  language  = {en}
}