@article{Jung‐KoenigFuellenbachMurphyetal.2020,
  author    = {Jung-K{\"o}nig, Mona and F{\"u}llenbach, Christoph and Murphy, Michael F. and Manzini, Paola and Laspina, Stefan and Pendry, Kate and M{\"u}hling, J{\"o}rg and Wikman, Agneta and Humbrecht, Catherine and Rigal, Jean-Christophe and Lasocki, Sigismond and Foll{\´e}a, Gilles and Seifried, Erhard and M{\"u}ller, Markus M. and Geisen, Christof and Aranko, Kari and Zacharowski, Kai and Meybohm, Patrick},
  title     = {Programmes for the management of preoperative anaemia: audit in ten European hospitals within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) working group},
  series = {Vox Sanguinis},
  volume    = {115},
  journal   = {Vox Sanguinis},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1111/vox.12872},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214049},
  pages     = {182 -- 191},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background and objectives Preoperative anaemia is an independent risk factor for a higher morbidity and mortality, a longer hospitalization and increased perioperative transfusion rates. Managing preoperative anaemia is the first of three pillars of Patient Blood Management (PBM), a multidisciplinary concept to improve patient safety. While various studies provide medical information on (successful) anaemia treatment pathways, knowledge of organizational details of diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia across Europe is scarce. Materials and methods To gain information on various aspects of preoperative anaemia management including organization, financing, diagnostics and treatment, we conducted a survey (74 questions) in ten hospitals from seven European nations within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) working group covering the year 2016. Results Organization and activity in the field of preoperative anaemia management were heterogeneous in the participating hospitals. Almost all hospitals had pathways for managing preoperative anaemia in place, however, only two nations had national guidelines. In six of the ten participating hospitals, preoperative anaemia management was organized by anaesthetists. Diagnostics and treatment focused on iron deficiency anaemia which, in most hospitals, was corrected with intravenous iron. Conclusion Implementation and approaches of preoperative anaemia management vary across Europe with a primary focus on treating iron deficiency anaemia. Findings of this survey motivated the hospitals involved to critically evaluate their practice and may also help other hospitals interested in PBM to develop action plans for diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmittMeybohmNeefetal.2022,
  author    = {Schmitt, Elke and Meybohm, Patrick and Neef, Vanessa and Baumgarten, Peter and Bayer, Alexandra and Choorapoikayil, Suma and Friederich, Patrick and Friedrich, Jens and Geisen, Christof and G{\"u}resir, Erdem and Gr{\"u}newald, Matthias and Gutjahr, Martin and Helmer, Philipp and Herrmann, Eva and M{\"u}ller, Markus and Narita, Diana and Raadts, Ansgar and Schwendner, Klaus and Seifried, Erhard and Stark, Patrick and Steinbicker, Andrea U. and Thoma, Josef and Velten, Markus and Weigt, Henry and Wiesenack, Christoph and Wittmann, Maria and Zacharowski, Kai and Piekarski, Florian},
  title     = {Preoperative anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage - a multicentre subanalysis of the German PBM Network Registry},
  series = {Acta Neurochirurgica},
  volume    = {164},
  journal   = {Acta Neurochirurgica},
  organization    = {German PBM Network Collaborators},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00701-022-05144-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-346754},
  pages     = {985-999},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose Anaemia is common in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid (aSAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). In surgical patients, anaemia was identified as an idenpendent risk factor for postoperative mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) and increased risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. This multicentre cohort observation study describes the incidence and effects of preoperative anaemia in this critical patient collective for a 10-year period. Methods This multicentre observational study included adult in-hospital surgical patients diagnosed with aSAH or ICH of 21 German hospitals (discharged from 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2020). Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the incidence and association of preoperative anaemia with RBC transfusion, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH. Results A total of n = 9081 patients were analysed (aSAH n = 5008; ICH n = 4073). Preoperative anaemia was present at 28.3\% in aSAH and 40.9\% in ICH. RBC transfusion rates were 29.9\% in aSAH and 29.3\% in ICH. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative anaemia is associated with a higher risk for RBC transfusion (OR = 3.25 in aSAH, OR = 4.16 in ICH, p < 0.001), for in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.48 in aSAH, OR = 1.53 in ICH, p < 0.001) and for several postoperative complications. Conclusions Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased RBC transfusion rates, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH.},
  language  = {en}
}