@phdthesis{Glutsch2021,
  author    = {Glutsch, Valerie},
  title     = {Implementierung eines kardialen Begleitmonitorings im Kontext experimenteller Tumortherapie (insbesondere Phase I/II Studien) zur fr{\"u}hen Detektion potenzieller Kardiotoxizit{\"a}t},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-21690},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-216909},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {CARMO - kurz f{\"u}r „kardiologisches Monitoring" - stellt eine Erweiterung des im Rahmen onkologischer Phase I/II Studien bereits implementierten kardiologischen Begleitmonitorings dar. Insgesamt 90 Studienpatienten der Early Clinical Trial Unit des Comprehensive Cancer Centers Mainfranken wurden m{\"o}glichst {\"u}ber einen Zeitraum von sechs Monaten experimenteller Therapie mittels serieller Elektrokardiogramme (EKG), Echokardiographie inklusive Deformationsbildgebung und Bestimmung der kardialen Biomarker systematisch kardiologisch {\"u}berwacht. Ver{\"a}nderungen der kardialen Funktion wurden anhand der Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE Version 4.03) graduiert. Auf Grundlage unserer klinischen Ergebnisse konnten schließlich das 12-Kanal-EKG, die Echokardiographie inklusive der Deformationsbildgebung, der kardiale Biomarker High-sensitive Troponin und zus{\"a}tzlich erstmalig auch das LZ-EKG als wichtige Untersuchungsmodalit{\"a}ten eines m{\"o}glichst vollst{\"a}ndigen kardialen Assessments identifiziert werden. Hypothetisch k{\"o}nnen die CARMO-Ergebnisse somit als Basis f{\"u}r verbesserte datenbasierte Empfehlungen zuk{\"u}nftiger kardiologischer Monitoringprogramme dienen.},
  subject      = {CARMO},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GlutschKneitzGesierichetal.2021,
  author    = {Glutsch, Valerie and Kneitz, Hermann and Gesierich, Anja and Goebeler, Matthias and Haferkamp, Sebastian and Becker, J{\"u}rgen C. and Ugurel, Selma and Schilling, Bastian},
  title     = {Activity of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in avelumab-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma},
  series = {Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy},
  volume    = {70},
  journal   = {Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {14320851},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00262-020-02832-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265635},
  pages     = {2087-2093},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine cutaneous malignancy with poor prognosis. In Europe, approved systemic therapies are limited to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab. For avelumab-refractory patients, efficient and safe treatment options are lacking. Methods At three different sites in Germany, clinical and molecular data of patients with metastatic MCC being refractory to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab and who were later on treated with combined IPI/NIVO were retrospectively collected and evaluated. Results Five patients treated at three different academic sites in Germany were enrolled. Three out of five patients investigated for this report responded to combined IPI/NIVO according to RECIST 1.1. Combined immunotherapy was well tolerated without any grade II or III immune-related adverse events. Two out of three responders to IPI/NIVO received platinum-based chemotherapy in between avelumab and combined immunotherapy. Conclusion In this small retrospective study, we observed a high response rate and durable responses to subsequent combined immunotherapy with IPI/NIVO in avelumab-refractory metastatic MCC patients. In conclusion, our data suggest a promising activity of second- or third-line PD-1- plus CTLA-4-blockade in patients with anti-PD-L1-refractory MCC.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LoddeForschnerHasseletal.2021,
  author    = {Lodde, Georg and Forschner, Andrea and Hassel, Jessica and Wulfken, Lena M. and Meier, Friedegund and Mohr, Peter and K{\"a}hler, Katharina and Schilling, Bastian and Loquai, Carmen and Berking, Carola and H{\"u}ning, Svea and Schatton, Kerstin and Gebhardt, Christoffer and Eckardt, Julia and Gutzmer, Ralf and Reinhardt, Lydia and Glutsch, Valerie and Nikfarjam, Ulrike and Erdmann, Michael and Stang, Andreas and Kowall, Bernd and Roesch, Alexander and Ugurel, Selma and Zimmer, Lisa and Schadendorf, Dirk and Livingstone, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Factors influencing the adjuvant therapy decision: results of a real-world multicenter data analysis of 904 melanoma patients},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13102319},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239583},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Adjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and targeted therapy (TT) significantly improved recurrence-free survival. This study investigates the real-world situation of 904 patients from 13 German skin cancer centers with an indication for adjuvant treatment since the approval of adjuvant ICI and TT. From adjusted log-binomial regression models, we estimated relative risks for associations between various influence factors and treatment decisions (adjuvant therapy yes/no, TT vs. ICI in BRAF mutant patients). Of these patients, 76.9\% (95\% CI 74-80) opted for a systemic adjuvant treatment. The probability of starting an adjuvant treatment was 26\% lower in patients >65 years (RR 0.74, 95\% CI 68-80). The most common reasons against adjuvant treatment given by patients were age (29.4\%, 95\% CI 24-38), and fear of adverse events (21.1\%, 95\% CI 16-28) and impaired quality of life (11.9\%, 95\% CI 7-16). Of all BRAF-mutated patients who opted for adjuvant treatment, 52.9\% (95\% CI 47-59) decided for ICI. Treatment decision for TT or ICI was barely associated with age, gender and tumor stage, but with comorbidities and affiliated center. Shortly after their approval, adjuvant treatments have been well accepted by physicians and patients. Age plays a decisive role in the decision for adjuvant treatment, while pre-existing autoimmune disease and regional differences influence the choice between TT or ICI.},
  language  = {en}
}