@article{WeidemannMaierStoerketal.2016, author = {Weidemann, Frank and Maier, Sebastian K. G. and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Brunner, Thomas and Liu, Dan and Hu, Kai and Seydelmann, Nora and Schneider, Andreas and Becher, Jan and Canan-K{\"u}hl, Sima and Blaschke, Daniela and Bijnens, Bart and Ertl, Georg and Wanner, Christoph and Nordbeck, Peter}, title = {Usefulness of an implantable loop recorder to detect clinically relevant arrhythmias in patients with advanced fabry cardiomyopathy}, series = {The American Journal of Cardiology}, volume = {118}, journal = {The American Journal of Cardiology}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.033}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188093}, pages = {264-274}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Patients with genetic cardiomyopathy that involves myocardial hypertrophy often develop clinically relevant arrhythmias that increase the risk of sudden death. Consequently, guidelines for medical device therapy were established for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but not for conditions with only anecdotal evidence of arrhythmias, like Fabry cardiomyopathy. Patients with Fabry cardiomyopathy progressively develop myocardial fibrosis, and sudden cardiac death occurs regularly. Because 24-hour Holier electrocardiograms (ECGs) might not detect clinically important arrhythmias, we tested an implanted loop recorder for continuous heart rhythm surveillance and determined its impact on therapy. This prospective study included 16 patients (12 men) with advanced Fabry cardiomyopathy, relevant hypertrophy, and replacement fibrosis in "loco typico." No patients previously exhibited clinically relevant arrhythmias on Holier ECGs. Patients received an implantable loop recorder and were prospectively followed with telemedicine for a median of 1.2 years (range 0.3 to 2.0 years). The primary end point was a clinically meaningful event, which required a therapy change, captured with the loop recorder. Patients submitted data regularly (14 +/- 11 times per month). During follow-up, 21 events were detected (including 4 asystole, i.e., ECG pauses >= 3 seconds) and 7 bradycardia events; 5 episodes of intermittent atrial fibrillation (>3 minutes) and 5 episodes of ventricular tachycardia (3 sustained and 2 nonsustained). Subsequently, as defined in the primary end point, 15 events leaded to a change of therapy. These patients required therapy with a pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator implantation and/or anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. In conclusion, clinically relevant arrhythmias that require further device and/or medical therapy are often missed with Holier ECGs in patients with advanced stage Fabry cardiomyopathy, but they can be detected by telemonitoring with an implantable loop recorder.}, language = {en} } @article{FitchettZinmanWanneretal.2016, author = {Fitchett, David and Zinman, Bernard and Wanner, Christoph and Lachin, John M. and Hantel, Stefan and Salsali, Afshin and Johansen, Odd Erik and Woerle, Hans J. and Broedl, Uli C. and Inzucchi, Silvio E.}, title = {Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME (R) trial}, series = {European Heart Journal}, volume = {37}, journal = {European Heart Journal}, number = {19}, doi = {10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188900}, pages = {1526-1534}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Aims We previously reported that in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) trial, empagliflozin added to standard of care reduced the risk of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all-cause death, and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. We have now further investigated heart failure outcomes in all patients and in subgroups, including patients with or without baseline heart failure. Methods and results Patients were randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, or placebo. Seven thousand and twenty patients were treated; 706 (10.1\%) had heart failure at baseline. Heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death occurred in a significantly lower percentage of patients treated with empagliflozin 265/4687 patients (5.7\%)] than with placebo 198/2333 patients (8.5\%)] hazard ratio, HR: 0.66 (95\% confidence interval: 0.55-0.79); P < 0.001], corresponding to a number needed to treat to prevent one heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death of 35 over 3 years. Consistent effects of empagliflozin were observed across subgroups defined by baseline characteristics, including patients with vs. without heart failure, and across categories of medications to treat diabetes and/or heart failure. Empagliflozin improved other heart failure outcomes, including hospitalization for or death from heart failure 2.8 vs. 4.5\%; HR: 0.61 (0.47-0.79); P < 0.001] and was associated with a reduction in all-cause hospitalization 36.8 vs. 39.6\%; HR: 0.89 (0.82-0.96); P = 0.003]. Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported by a higher proportion of patients with vs. without heart failure at baseline in both treatment groups, but were no more common with empagliflozin than with placebo. Conclusion In patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk, empagliflozin reduced heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death, with a consistent benefit in patients with and without baseline heart failure.}, language = {en} }