@article{AngerDoeringvanDametal.2021,
  author    = {Anger, Friedrich and D{\"o}ring, Anna and van Dam, Jacob and Lock, Johann Frisco and Klein, Ingo and Bittrich, Max and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin and Kunzmann, Volker and van Eijck, Casper and L{\"o}b, Stefan},
  title     = {Impact of Borderline Resectability in Pancreatic Head Cancer on Patient Survival: Biology Matters According to the New International Consensus Criteria},
  series = {Annals of Surgical Oncology},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Annals of Surgical Oncology},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {1068-9265},
  doi       = {10.1245/s10434-020-09100-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235251},
  pages     = {2325-2336},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background International consensus criteria (ICC) have redefined borderline resectability for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to three dimensions: anatomical (BR-A), biological (BR-B), and conditional (BR-C). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumour and vessels but that biological and conditional dimensions also are important. Methods Patients' tumours were retrospectively defined borderline resectable according to ICC. The study cohort was grouped into either BR-A or BR-B and compared with patients considered primarily resectable (R). Differences in postoperative complications, pathological reports, overall (OS), and disease-free survival were assessed. Results A total of 345 patients underwent resection for PDAC. By applying ICC in routine preoperative assessment, 30 patients were classified as stage BR-A and 62 patients as stage BR-B. In total, 253 patients were considered R. The cohort did not contain BR-C patients. No differences in postoperative complications were detected. Median OS was significantly shorter in BR-A (15 months) and BR-B (12 months) compared with R (20 months) patients (BR-A vs. R: p = 0.09 and BR-B vs. R: p < 0.001). CA19-9, as the determining factor of BR-B patients, turned out to be an independent prognostic risk factor for OS. Conclusions Preoperative staging defining surgical resectability in PDAC according to ICC is crucial for patient survival. Patients with PDAC BR-B should be considered for multimodal neoadjuvant therapy even if considered anatomically resectable.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WagnerWetzWiegeringetal.2021,
  author    = {Wagner, Johanna C. and Wetz, Anja and Wiegering, Armin and Lock, Johan F. and L{\"o}b, Stefan and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Klein, Ingo},
  title     = {Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy},
  series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  volume    = {406},
  journal   = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1435-2451},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00423-021-02221-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267541},
  pages     = {2479-2487},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds "preconditioned" with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). Results One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013-2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7\% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80\% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. Conclusion Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.},
  language  = {en}
}