@article{KarimiFreundWageretal.2021, author = {Karimi, Sohail M. and Freund, Matthias and Wager, Brittney M. and Knoblauch, Michael and Fromm, J{\"o}rg and M. Mueller, Heike and Ache, Peter and Krischke, Markus and Mueller, Martin J. and M{\"u}ller, Tobias and Dittrich, Marcus and Geilfus, Christoph-Martin and Alfaran, Ahmed H. and Hedrich, Rainer and Deeken, Rosalia}, title = {Under salt stress guard cells rewire ion transport and abscisic acid signaling}, series = {New Phytologist}, volume = {231}, journal = {New Phytologist}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1111/nph.17376}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-259635}, pages = {1040-1055}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Soil salinity is an increasingly global problem which hampers plant growth and crop yield. Plant productivity depends on optimal water-use efficiency and photosynthetic capacity balanced by stomatal conductance. Whether and how stomatal behavior contributes to salt sensitivity or tolerance is currently unknown. This work identifies guard cell-specific signaling networks exerted by a salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant plant under ionic and osmotic stress conditions accompanied by increasing NaCl loads. We challenged soil-grown Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella salsuginea plants with short- and long-term salinity stress and monitored genome-wide gene expression and signals of guard cells that determine their function. Arabidopsis plants suffered from both salt regimes and showed reduced stomatal conductance while Thellungiella displayed no obvious stress symptoms. The salt-dependent gene expression changes of guard cells supported the ability of the halophyte to maintain high potassium to sodium ratios and to attenuate the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway which the glycophyte kept activated despite fading ABA concentrations. Our study shows that salinity stress and even the different tolerances are manifested on a single cell level. Halophytic guard cells are less sensitive than glycophytic guard cells, providing opportunities to manipulate stomatal behavior and improve plant productivity.}, language = {en} } @article{GrassingerFlorenMuelleretal.2021, author = {Grassinger, Julia Maria and Floren, Andreas and M{\"u}ller, Tobias and Cerezo-Echevarria, Argi{\~n}e and Beitzinger, Christoph and Conrad, David and T{\"o}rner, Katrin and Staudacher, Marlies and Aupperle-Lellbach, Heike}, title = {Digital lesions in dogs: a statistical breed analysis of 2912 cases}, series = {Veterinary Sciences}, volume = {8}, journal = {Veterinary Sciences}, number = {7}, issn = {2306-7381}, doi = {10.3390/vetsci8070136}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242690}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Breed predispositions to canine digital neoplasms are well known. However, there is currently no statistical analysis identifying the least affected breeds. To this end, 2912 canine amputated digits submitted from 2014-2019 to the Laboklin GmbH \& Co. KG for routine diagnostics were statistically analyzed. The study population consisted of 155 different breeds (most common: 634 Mongrels, 411 Schnauzers, 197 Labrador Retrievers, 93 Golden Retrievers). Non-neoplastic processes were present in 1246 (43\%), tumor-like lesions in 138 (5\%), and neoplasms in 1528 cases (52\%). Benign tumors (n = 335) were characterized by 217 subungual keratoacanthomas, 36 histiocytomas, 35 plasmacytomas, 16 papillomas, 12 melanocytomas, 9 sebaceous gland tumors, 6 lipomas, and 4 bone tumors. Malignant neoplasms (n = 1193) included 758 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 196 malignant melanomas (MM), 76 soft tissue sarcomas, 52 mast cell tumors, 37 non-specified sarcomas, 29 anaplastic neoplasms, 24 carcinomas, 20 bone tumors, and 1 histiocytic sarcoma. Predisposed breeds for SCC included the Schnauzer (log OR = 2.61), Briard (log OR = 1.78), Rottweiler (log OR = 1.54), Poodle (log OR = 1.40), and Dachshund (log OR = 1.30). Jack Russell Terriers (log OR = -2.95) were significantly less affected by SCC than Mongrels. Acral MM were significantly more frequent in Rottweilers (log OR = 1.88) and Labrador Retrievers (log OR = 1.09). In contrast, Dachshunds (log OR = -2.17), Jack Russell Terriers (log OR = -1.88), and Rhodesian Ridgebacks (log OR = -1.88) were rarely affected. This contrasted with the well-known predisposition of Dachshunds and Rhodesian Ridgebacks to oral and cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms. Further studies are needed to explain the underlying reasons for breed predisposition or "resistance" to the development of specific acral tumors and/or other sites.}, language = {en} }