@article{WidderKelmReibetanzetal.2022,
  author    = {Widder, Anna and Kelm, Matthias and Reibetanz, Joachim and Wiegering, Armin and Matthes, Niels and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Seyfried, Florian and Flemming, Sven},
  title     = {Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy — postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost effectiveness},
  series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  number    = {17},
  issn      = {1660-4601},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijerph191710606},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286203},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Robotic-assisted colon surgery may contain advantages over the laparoscopic approach, but clear evidence is sparse. This study aimed to analyze postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. All consecutive patients who received minimal-invasive left hemicolectomy at the Department of Surgery I at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg in 2021 were prospectively included. Importantly, no patient selection for either procedure was carried out. The robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic approaches were compared head to head for postoperative short-term outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness. A total of 61 patients were included, with 26 patients having received a robotic-assisted approach. Baseline characteristics did not differ among the groups. Patients receiving a robotic-assisted approach had a significantly decreased length of hospital stay as well as lower rates of complications in comparison to patients who received laparoscopic surgery (n = 35). In addition, C-reactive protein as a marker of systemic stress response was significantly reduced postoperatively in patients who were operated on in a robotic-assisted manner. Consequently, robotic-assisted surgery could be performed in a cost-effective manner. Thus, robotic-assisted left hemicolectomy represents a safe and cost-effective procedure and might improve patient outcomes in comparison to laparoscopic surgery.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DiersBaumLehmannetal.2022,
  author    = {Diers, Johannes and Baum, Philip and Lehmann, Kai and Uttinger, Konstatin and Baumann, Nikolas and Pietryga, Sebastian and Hankir, Mohammed and Matthes, Niels and Lock, Johann F. and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Disproportionately high failure to rescue rates after resection for colorectal cancer in the geriatric patient population - A nationwide study},
  series = {Cancer Medicine},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancer Medicine},
  number    = {22},
  doi       = {10.1002/cam4.4784},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-312858},
  pages     = {4256-4264},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Colorectal cancer incidence increases with patient age. The aim of this study was to assess, at the nationwide level, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue in geriatric patients (≥ 80 years old) with colorectal cancer arising from postoperative complications. Methods All patients receiving surgery for colorectal cancer in Germany between 2012 and 2018 were identified in a nationwide database. Association between age and in-hospital mortality following surgery and failure to rescue, defined as death after complication, were determined in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Three lakh twenty-eight thousands two hundred and ninety patients with colorectal cancer were included of whom 77,287 were 80 years or older. With increasing age, a significant relative increase in right hemicolectomy was observed. In general, these patients had more comorbid conditions and higher frailty. In-hospital mortality following colorectal cancer surgery was 4.9\% but geriatric patients displayed a significantly higher postoperative in-hospital mortality of 10.6\%. The overall postoperative complication rate as well as failure to rescue increased with age. In contrast, surgical site infection (SSI) and anastomotic leakage (AL) did not increase in geriatric patients, whereas the associated mortality increased disproportionately (13.3\% for SSI and 29.9\% mortality for patients with AI, both p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounders showed that geriatric patients had almost five-times higher odds for death after surgery than the baseline age group below 60 (OR 4.86; 95\%CI [4.45-5.53], p < 0.001). Conclusion Geriatric patients have higher mortality after colorectal cancer surgery. This may be partly due to higher frailty and disproportionately higher rates of failure to rescue arising from postoperative complications.},
  language  = {en}
}