@article{HussHalbgebauerOeckletal.2016,
  author    = {Huss, Andr{\´e} M. and Halbgebauer, Steffen and {\"O}ckl, Patrick and Trebst, Corinna and Spreer, Annette and Borisow, Nadja and Harrer, Andrea and Brecht, Isabel and Balint, Bettina and Stich, Oliver and Schlegel, Sabine and Retzlaff, Nele and Winkelmann, Alexander and Roesler, Romy and Lauda, Florian and Yildiz, {\"O}zlem and Voß, Elke and Muche, Rainer and Rauer, Sebastian and Bergh, Florian Then and Otto, Markus and Paul, Friedemann and Wildemann, Brigitte and Kraus, J{\"o}rg and Ruprecht, Klemens and Stangel, Martin and Buttmann, Mathias and Zettl, Uwe K. and Tumani, Hayrettin},
  title     = {Importance of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the era of McDonald 2010 criteria: a German-Austrian retrospective multicenter study in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome},
  series = {Journal of Neurology},
  volume    = {263},
  journal   = {Journal of Neurology},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00415-016-8302-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-186619},
  pages     = {2499-2504},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The majority of patients presenting with a first clinical symptom suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) do not fulfill the MRI criteria for dissemination in space and time according to the 2010 revision of the McDonald diagnostic criteria for MS and are thus classified as clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). To re-evaluate the utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis in the context of the revised McDonald criteria from 2010, we conducted a retrospective multicenter study aimed at determining the prevalence and predictive value of oligoclonal IgG bands (OCBs) in patients with CIS. Patients were recruited from ten specialized MS centers in Germany and Austria. We collected data from 406 patients; at disease onset, 44/406 (11 \%) fulfilled the McDonald 2010 criteria for MS. Intrathecal IgG OCBs were detected in 310/362 (86 \%) of CIS patients. Those patients were twice as likely to convert to MS according to McDonald 2010 criteria as OCB-negative individuals (hazard ratio = 2.1, p = 0.0014) and in a shorter time period of 25 months (95 \% CI 21-34) compared to 47 months in OCB-negative individuals (95 \% CI 36-85). In patients without brain lesions at first attack and presence of intrathecal OCBs (30/44), conversion rate to MS was 60 \% (18/30), whereas it was only 21 \% (3/14) in those without OCBs. Our data confirm that in patients with CIS the risk of conversion to MS substantially increases if OCBs are present at onset. CSF analysis definitely helps to evaluate the prognosis in patients who do not have MS according to the revised McDonald criteria.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SemlerAnderlStraubUttneretal.2018,
  author    = {Semler, Elisa and Anderl-Straub, Sarah and Uttner, Ingo and Diehl-Schmid, Janine and Danek, Adrian and Einsiedler, Beate and Fassbender, Klaus and Fliessbach, Klaus and Huppertz, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Jahn, Holger and Kornhuber, Johannes and Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard and Lauer, Martin and Muche, Rainer and Prudlo, Johannes and Schneider, Anja and Schroeter, Matthias L. and Ludolph, Albert C. and Otto, Markus},
  title     = {A language-based sum score for the course and therapeutic intervention in primary progressive aphasia},
  series = {Alzheimer's Research \& Therapy},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Alzheimer's Research \& Therapy},
  organization    = {FLTD consortium},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13195-018-0345-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236277},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background With upcoming therapeutic interventions for patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), instruments for the follow-up of patients are needed to describe disease progression and to evaluate potential therapeutic effects. So far, volumetric brain changes have been proposed as clinical endpoints in the literature, but cognitive scores are still lacking. This study followed disease progression predominantly in language-based performance within 1 year and defined a PPA sum score which can be used in therapeutic interventions. Methods We assessed 28 patients with nonfluent variant PPA, 17 with semantic variant PPA, 13 with logopenic variant PPA, and 28 healthy controls in detail for 1 year. The most informative neuropsychological assessments were combined to a sum score, and associations between brain atrophy were investigated followed by a sample size calculation for clinical trials. Results Significant absolute changes up to 20\% in cognitive tests were found after 1 year. Semantic and phonemic word fluency, Boston Naming Test, Digit Span, Token Test, AAT Written language, and Cookie Test were identified as the best markers for disease progression. These tasks provide the basis of a new PPA sum score. Assuming a therapeutic effect of 50\% reduction in cognitive decline for sample size calculations, a number of 56 cases is needed to find a significant treatment effect. Correlations between cognitive decline and atrophy showed a correlation up to r = 0.7 between the sum score and frontal structures, namely the superior and inferior frontal gyrus, as well as with left-sided subcortical structures. Conclusion Our findings support the high performance of the proposed sum score in the follow-up of PPA and recommend it as an outcome measure in intervention studies.},
  language  = {en}
}