@article{HaertleMaierhoferBoecketal.2017, author = {Haertle, Larissa and Maierhofer, Anna and B{\"o}ck, Julia and Lehnen, Harald and B{\"o}ttcher, Yvonne and Bl{\"u}her, Matthias and Schorsch, Martin and Potabattula, Ramya and El Hajj, Nady and Appenzeller, Silke and Haaf, Thomas}, title = {Hypermethylation of the non-imprinted maternal MEG3 and paternal MEST alleles is highly variable among normal individuals}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0184030}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170433}, pages = {e0184030}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Imprinted genes show parent-specific activity (functional haploidy), which makes them particularly vulnerable to epigenetic dysregulation. Here we studied the methylation profiles of oppositely imprinted genes at single DNA molecule resolution by two independent parental allele-specific deep bisulfite sequencing (DBS) techniques. Using Roche (GSJunior) next generation sequencing technology, we analyzed the maternally imprinted MEST promoter and the paternally imprinted MEG3 intergenic (IG) differentially methylated region (DMR) in fetal cord blood, adult blood, and visceral adipose tissue. Epimutations were defined as paternal or maternal alleles with >50\% aberrantly (de)methylated CpG sites, showing the wrong methylation imprint. The epimutation rates (range 2-66\%) of the paternal MEST and the maternal MEG3 IG DMR allele, which should be completely unmethylated, were significantly higher than those (0-15\%) of the maternal MEST and paternal MEG3 alleles, which are expected to be fully methylated. This hypermethylation of the non-imprinted allele (HNA) was independent of parental origin. Very low epimutation rates in sperm suggest that HNA occurred after fertilization. DBS with Illumina (MiSeq) technology confirmed HNA for the MEST promoter and the MEG3 IG DMR, and to a lesser extent, for the paternally imprinted secondary MEG3 promoter and the maternally imprinted PEG3 promoter. HNA leads to biallelic methylation of imprinted genes in a considerable proportion of normal body cells (somatic mosaicism) and is highly variable between individuals. We propose that during development and differentiation maintenance of differential methylation at most imprinting control regions may become to some extent redundant. The accumulation of stochastic and environmentally-induced methylation errors on the non-imprinted allele may increase epigenetic diversity between cells and individuals.}, language = {en} } @article{PrellSenPotabattulaetal.2022, author = {Prell, Andreas and Sen, Mustafa Orkun and Potabattula, Ramya and Bernhardt, Laura and Dittrich, Marcus and Hahn, Thomas and Schorsch, Martin and Zacchini, Federica and Ptak, Grazyna Ewa and Niemann, Heiner and Haaf, Thomas}, title = {Species-specific paternal age effects and sperm methylation levels of developmentally important genes}, series = {Cells}, volume = {11}, journal = {Cells}, number = {4}, issn = {2073-4409}, doi = {10.3390/cells11040731}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262301}, year = {2022}, abstract = {A growing number of sperm methylome analyses have identified genomic loci that are susceptible to paternal age effects in a variety of mammalian species, including human, bovine, and mouse. However, there is little overlap between different data sets. Here, we studied whether or not paternal age effects on the sperm epigenome have been conserved in mammalian evolution and compared methylation patterns of orthologous regulatory regions (mainly gene promoters) containing both conserved and non-conserved CpG sites in 94 human, 36 bovine, and 94 mouse sperm samples, using bisulfite pyrosequencing. We discovered three (NFKB2, RASGEF1C, and RPL6) age-related differentially methylated regions (ageDMRs) in humans, four (CHD7, HDAC11, PAK1, and PTK2B) in bovines, and three (Def6, Nrxn2, and Tbx19) in mice. Remarkably, the identified sperm ageDMRs were all species-specific. Most ageDMRs were in genomic regions with medium methylation levels and large methylation variation. Orthologous regions in species not showing this age effect were either hypermethylated (>80\%) or hypomethylated (<20\%). In humans and mice, ageDMRs lost methylation, whereas bovine ageDMRs gained methylation with age. Our results are in line with the hypothesis that sperm ageDMRs are in regions under epigenomic evolution and may be part of an epigenetic mechanism(s) for lineage-specific environmental adaptations and provide a solid basis for studies on downstream effects in the genes analyzed here.}, language = {en} }