@article{WevrettFenwickScuffhametal.2018,
  author    = {Wevrett, Jill and Fenwick, Andrew and Scuffham, James and Johansson, Lena and Gear, Jonathan and Schl{\"o}gl, Susanne and Segbers, Marcel and Sj{\"o}green-Gleisner, Katarina and Soln{\´y}, Pavel and Lassmann, Michael and Tipping, Jill and Nisbet, Andrew},
  title     = {Inter-comparison of quantitative imaging of lutetium-177 (\(^{177}\)Lu) in European hospitals},
  series = {EJNMMI Physics},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {EJNMMI Physics},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40658-018-0213-z},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233658},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background This inter-comparison exercise was performed to demonstrate the variability of quantitative SPECT/CT imaging for lutetium-177 (\(^{177}\)Lu) in current clinical practice. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of using international inter-comparison exercises as a means to ensure consistency between clinical sites whilst enabling the sites to use their own choice of quantitative imaging protocols, specific to their systems. Dual-compartment concentric spherical sources of accurately known activity concentrations were prepared and sent to seven European clinical sites. The site staff were not aware of the true volumes or activity within the sources—they performed SPECT/CT imaging of the source, positioned within a water-filled phantom, using their own choice of parameters and reported their estimate of the activities within the source. Results The volumes reported by the participants for the inner section of the source were all within 29\% of the true value and within 60\% of the true value for the outer section. The activities reported by the participants for the inner section of the source were all within 20\% of the true value, whilst those reported for the outer section were up to 83\% different to the true value. Conclusions A variety of calibration and segmentation methods were used by the participants for this exercise which demonstrated the variability of quantitative imaging across clinical sites. This paper presents a method to assess consistency between sites using different calibration and segmentation methods.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TranGiaDenisBacelarFerreiraetal.2021,
  author    = {Tran-Gia, Johannes and Denis-Bacelar, Ana M. and Ferreira, Kelley M. and Robinson, Andrew P. and Calvert, Nicholas and Fenwick, Andrew J. and Finocchiaro, Domenico and Fioroni, Federica and Grassi, Elisa and Heetun, Warda and Jewitt, Stephanie J. and Kotzassarlidou, Maria and Ljungberg, Michael and McGowan, Daniel R. and Scott, Nathaniel and Scuffham, James and Gleisner, Katarina Sj{\"o}green and Tipping, Jill and Wevrett, Jill and Lassmann, Michael},
  title     = {A multicentre and multi-national evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging performed within the MRTDosimetry project},
  series = {EJNMMI Physics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {EJNMMI Physics},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40658-021-00397-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270380},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Patient-specific dosimetry is required to ensure the safety of molecular radiotherapy and to predict response. Dosimetry involves several steps, the first of which is the determination of the activity of the radiopharmaceutical taken up by an organ/lesion over time. As uncertainties propagate along each of the subsequent steps (integration of the time-activity curve, absorbed dose calculation), establishing a reliable activity quantification is essential. The MRTDosimetry project was a European initiative to bring together expertise in metrology and nuclear medicine research, with one main goal of standardizing quantitative \(^{177}\)Lu SPECT/CT imaging based on a calibration protocol developed and tested in a multicentre inter-comparison. This study presents the setup and results of this comparison exercise. Methods The inter-comparison included nine SPECT/CT systems. Each site performed a set of three measurements with the same setup (system, acquisition and reconstruction): (1) Determination of an image calibration for conversion from counts to activity concentration (large cylinder phantom), (2) determination of recovery coefficients for partial volume correction (IEC NEMA PET body phantom with sphere inserts), (3) validation of the established quantitative imaging setup using a 3D printed two-organ phantom (ICRP110-based kidney and spleen). In contrast to previous efforts, traceability of the activity measurement was required for each participant, and all participants were asked to calculate uncertainties for their SPECT-based activities. Results Similar combinations of imaging system and reconstruction lead to similar image calibration factors. The activity ratio results of the anthropomorphic phantom validation demonstrate significant harmonization of quantitative imaging performance between the sites with all sites falling within one standard deviation of the mean values for all inserts. Activity recovery was underestimated for total kidney, spleen, and kidney cortex, while it was overestimated for the medulla. Conclusion This international comparison exercise demonstrates that harmonization of quantitative SPECT/CT is feasible when following very specific instructions of a dedicated calibration protocol, as developed within the MRTDosimetry project. While quantitative imaging performance demonstrates significant harmonization, an over- and underestimation of the activity recovery highlights the limitations of any partial volume correction in the presence of spill-in and spill-out between two adjacent volumes of interests.},
  language  = {en}
}