@article{KuonBlasiUnsoeldetal.2022,
  author    = {Kuon, Jonas and Blasi, Miriam and Uns{\"o}ld, Laura and Vogt, Jeannette and Mehnert, Anja and Alt-Epping, Bernd and Oorschot, Birgitt van and Sistermanns, Jochen and Ahlborn, Miriam and Ritterbusch, Ulrike and Stevens, Susanne and Kahl, Christoph and Ruellan, Anne and Matthias, Kathrin and Kubin, Thomas and Stahlhut, Kerstin and Heider, Andrea and Lordick, Florian and Thomas, Michael},
  title     = {Impact of molecular alterations on quality of life and prognostic understanding over time in patients with incurable lung cancer: a multicenter, longitudinal, prospective cohort study},
  series = {Supportive Care in Cancer},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Supportive Care in Cancer},
  number    = {4},
  organization    = {Arbeitsgemeinschaft Palliativmedizin (APM) of the German Cancer Society (DKG)},
  issn      = {0941-4355},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00520-021-06736-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-308211},
  pages     = {3131-3140},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate changes over time in quality of life (QoL) in incurable lung cancer patients and the impact of determinants like molecular alterations (MA). Methods In a prospective, longitudinal, multicentric study, we assessed QoL, symptom burden, psychological distress, unmet needs, and prognostic understanding of patients diagnosed with incurable lung cancer at the time of the diagnosis (T0) and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2) and 12 months (T3) using validated questionnaires like FACT-L, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT), PHQ-4, SCNS-SF-34, and SEIQoL. Results Two hundred seventeen patients were enrolled, 22 (10\%) with reported MA. QoL scores improved over time, with a significant trend for DT, PHQ-4, and SCNS-SF-34. Significant determinants for stable or improving scores over time were survival > 6 months, performance status at the time of diagnosis, and presence of MA. Patients with MA showed better QoL scores (FACT-L at T1 104.4 vs 86.3; at T2 107.5 vs 90.0; at T3 100.9 vs 92.8) and lower psychological distress (NCCN DT at T1 3.3 vs 5; at T2 2.7 vs 4.5; at T3 3.7 vs 4.5; PHQ-4 at T1 2.3 vs 4.1; at T2 1.7 vs 3.6; at T3 2.2 vs 3.6), but also a worsening of the scores at 1 year and a higher percentage of inaccurate prognostic understanding (27 vs 17\%) compared to patients without MA. Conclusion Patients with tumors harboring MA are at risk of QoL deterioration during the course of the disease. Physicians should adapt their communication strategies in order to maintain or improve QoL.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MehnertKochSchulzetal.2012,
  author    = {Mehnert, Anja and Koch, Uwe and Schulz, Holger and Wegscheider, Karl and Weis, Joachim and Faller, Hermann and Keller, Monika and Br{\"a}hler, Elmar and H{\"a}rter, Martin},
  title     = {Prevalence of mental disorders, psychosocial distress and need for psychosocial support in cancer patients - study protocol of an epidemiological multi-center study},
  volume    = {12},
  number    = {70},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-244X-12-70},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-153296},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background Empirical studies investigating the prevalence of mental disorders and psychological distress in cancer patients have gained increasing importance during recent years, particularly with the objective to develop and implement psychosocial interventions within the cancer care system. Primary purpose of this epidemiological cross-sectional multi-center study is to detect the 4-week-, 12-month-, and lifetime prevalence rates of comorbid mental disorders and to further assess psychological distress and psychosocial support needs in cancer patients across all major tumor entities within the in- and outpatient oncological health care and rehabilitation settings in Germany. Methods/Design In this multicenter, epidemiological cross-sectional study, cancer patients across all major tumor entities will be enrolled from acute care hospitals, outpatient cancer care facilities, and rehabilitation centers in five major study centers in Germany: Freiburg, Hamburg, Heidelberg, Leipzig and W{\"u}rzburg. A proportional stratified random sample based on the nationwide incidence of all cancer diagnoses in Germany is used. Patients are consecutively recruited in all centers. On the basis of a depression screener (PHQ-9) 50\% of the participants that score below the cutoff point of 9 and all patients scoring above are assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview for Oncology (CIDI-O). In addition, all patients complete validated questionnaires measuring emotional distress, information and psychosocial support needs as well as quality of life. Discussion Epidemiological data on the prevalence of mental disorders and distress provide detailed and valid information for the estimation of the demands for the type and extent of psychosocial support interventions. The data will provide information about specific demographic, functional, cancer- and treatment-related risk factors for mental comorbidity and psychosocial distress, specific supportive care needs and use of psychosocial support offers.},
  language  = {en}
}