@article{ElKeredySchleyerKoenigetal.2012,
  author    = {El-Keredy, Amira and Schleyer, Michael and K{\"o}nig, Christian and Ekim, Aslihan and Gerber, Bertram},
  title     = {Behavioural Analyses of Quinine Processing in Choice, Feeding and Learning of Larval Drosophila},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0040525},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130811},
  pages     = {e40525},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Gustatory stimuli can support both immediate reflexive behaviour, such as choice and feeding, and can drive internal reinforcement in associative learning. For larval Drosophila, we here provide a first systematic behavioural analysis of these functions with respect to quinine as a study case of a substance which humans report as "tasting bitter". We describe the dose-effect functions for these different kinds of behaviour and find that a half-maximal effect of quinine to suppress feeding needs substantially higher quinine concentrations (2.0 mM) than is the case for internal reinforcement (0.6 mM). Interestingly, in previous studies (Niewalda et al. 2008, Schipanski et al 2008) we had found the reverse for sodium chloride and fructose/sucrose, such that dose-effect functions for those tastants were shifted towards lower concentrations for feeding as compared to reinforcement, arguing that the differences in dose-effect function between these behaviours do not reflect artefacts of the types of assay used. The current results regarding quinine thus provide a starting point to investigate how the gustatory system is organized on the cellular and/or molecular level to result in different behavioural tuning curves towards a bitter tastant.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GrussWieserSchweinbergeretal.2012,
  author    = {Gruss, L. Forest and Wieser, Matthias J. and Schweinberger, Stefan R. and Keil, Andreas},
  title     = {Face-evoked steady-state visual potentials: effects of presentation rate and face inversion},
  series = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  number    = {316},
  doi       = {10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134399},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Face processing can be explored using electrophysiological methods. Research with event-related potentials has demonstrated the so-called face inversion effect, in which the N170 component is enhanced in amplitude and latency to inverted, compared to upright, faces. The present study explored the extent to which repetitive lower-level visual cortical engagement, reflected in flicker steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs), shows similar amplitude enhancement to face inversion. We also asked if inversion-related ssVEP modulation would be dependent on the stimulation rate at which upright and inverted faces were flickered. To this end, multiple tagging frequencies were used (5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz) across two studies (n=21, n=18). Results showed that amplitude enhancement of the ssVEP for inverted faces was found solely at higher stimulation frequencies (15 and 20 Hz). By contrast, lower frequency ssVEPs did not show this inversion effect. These findings suggest that stimulation frequency affects the sensitivity of ssVEPs to face inversion.},
  language  = {en}
}