@article{SchneiderHuestegge2019, author = {Schneider, Norbert and Huestegge, Lynn}, title = {Interaction of oculomotor and manual behavior: evidence from simulated driving in an approach-avoidance steering task}, series = {Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications}, volume = {4}, journal = {Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications}, doi = {10.1186/s41235-019-0170-7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200419}, pages = {19}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Background While the coordination of oculomotor and manual behavior is essential for driving a car, surprisingly little is known about this interaction, especially in situations requiring a quick steering reaction. In the present study, we analyzed oculomotor gaze and manual steering behavior in approach and avoidance tasks. Three task blocks were implemented within a dynamic simulated driving environment requiring the driver either to steer away from/toward a visual stimulus or to switch between both tasks. Results Task blocks requiring task switches were associated with higher manual response times and increased error rates. Manual response times did not significantly differ depending on whether drivers had to steer away from vs toward a stimulus, whereas oculomotor response times and gaze pattern variability were increased when drivers had to steer away from a stimulus compared to steering toward a stimulus. Conclusion The increased manual response times and error rates in mixed tasks indicate performance costs associated with cognitive flexibility, while the increased oculomotor response times and gaze pattern variability indicate a parsimonious cross-modal action control strategy (avoiding stimulus fixation prior to steering away from it) for the avoidance scenario. Several discrepancies between these results and typical eye-hand interaction patterns in basic laboratory research suggest that the specific goals and complex perceptual affordances associated with driving a vehicle strongly shape cross-modal control of behavior.}, language = {en} } @article{GrobFleischmannGruebeletal.2017, author = {Grob, Robin and Fleischmann, Pauline N. and Gr{\"u}bel, Kornelia and Wehner, R{\"u}diger and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang}, title = {The role of celestial compass information in Cataglyphis ants during learning walks and for neuroplasticity in the central complex and mushroom bodies}, series = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience}, volume = {11}, journal = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience}, number = {226}, doi = {10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00226}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-159235}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Central place foragers are faced with the challenge to learn the position of their nest entrance in its surroundings, in order to find their way back home every time they go out to search for food. To acquire navigational information at the beginning of their foraging career, Cataglyphis noda performs learning walks during the transition from interior worker to forager. These small loops around the nest entrance are repeatedly interrupted by strikingly accurate back turns during which the ants stop and precisely gaze back to the nest entrance—presumably to learn the landmark panorama of the nest surroundings. However, as at this point the complete navigational toolkit is not yet available, the ants are in need of a reference system for the compass component of the path integrator to align their nest entrance-directed gazes. In order to find this directional reference system, we systematically manipulated the skylight information received by ants during learning walks in their natural habitat, as it has been previously suggested that the celestial compass, as part of the path integrator, might provide such a reference system. High-speed video analyses of distinct learning walk elements revealed that even exclusion from the skylight polarization pattern, UV-light spectrum and the position of the sun did not alter the accuracy of the look back to the nest behavior. We therefore conclude that C. noda uses a different reference system to initially align their gaze directions. However, a comparison of neuroanatomical changes in the central complex and the mushroom bodies before and after learning walks revealed that exposure to UV light together with a naturally changing polarization pattern was essential to induce neuroplasticity in these high-order sensory integration centers of the ant brain. This suggests a crucial role of celestial information, in particular a changing polarization pattern, in initially calibrating the celestial compass system.}, language = {en} } @article{HuesteggeBoeckler2016, author = {Huestegge, Lynn and B{\"o}ckler, Anne}, title = {Out of the corner of the driver's eye: Peripheral processing of hazards in static traffic scenes}, series = {Journal of Vision}, volume = {16}, journal = {Journal of Vision}, number = {11}, doi = {10.1167/16.2.11}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-147726}, pages = {1-15}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Effective gaze control in traffic, based on peripheral visual information, is important to avoid hazards. Whereas previous hazard perception research mainly focused on skill-component development (e.g., orientation and hazard processing), little is known about the role and dynamics of peripheral vision in hazard perception. We analyzed eye movement data from a study in which participants scanned static traffic scenes including medium-level versus dangerous hazards and focused on characteristics of fixations prior to entering the hazard region. We found that initial saccade amplitudes into the hazard region were substantially longer for dangerous (vs. medium-level) hazards, irrespective of participants' driving expertise. An analysis of the temporal dynamics of this hazard-level dependent saccade targeting distance effect revealed that peripheral hazard-level processing occurred around 200-400 ms during the course of the fixation prior to entering the hazard region. An additional psychophysical hazard detection experiment, in which hazard eccentricity was manipulated, revealed better detection for dangerous (vs. medium-level) hazards in both central and peripheral vision. Furthermore, we observed a significant perceptual decline from center to periphery for medium (but not for highly) dangerous hazards. Overall, the results suggest that hazard processing is remarkably effective in peripheral vision and utilized to guide the eyes toward potential hazards.}, language = {en} }