@article{LibreSeisslerGuerreroetal.2021, author = {Libre, Camille and Seissler, Tanja and Guerrero, Santiago and Batisse, Julien and Verriez, C{\´e}dric and Stupfler, Benjamin and Gilmer, Orian and Cabrera-Rodriguez, Romina and Weber, Melanie M. and Valenzuela-Fernandez, Agustin and Cimarelli, Andrea and Etienne, Lucie and Marquet, Roland and Paillart, Jean-Christophe}, title = {A conserved uORF regulates APOBEC3G translation and is targeted by HIV-1 Vif protein to repress the antiviral factor}, series = {Biomedicines}, volume = {10}, journal = {Biomedicines}, number = {1}, issn = {2227-9059}, doi = {10.3390/biomedicines10010013}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-252147}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The HIV-1 Vif protein is essential for viral fitness and pathogenicity. Vif decreases expression of cellular restriction factors APOBEC3G (A3G), A3F, A3D and A3H, which inhibit HIV-1 replication by inducing hypermutation during reverse transcription. Vif counteracts A3G at several levels (transcription, translation, and protein degradation) that altogether reduce the levels of A3G in cells and prevent its incorporation into viral particles. How Vif affects A3G translation remains unclear. Here, we uncovered the importance of a short conserved uORF (upstream ORF) located within two critical stem-loop structures of the 5′ untranslated region (5′-UTR) of A3G mRNA for this process. A3G translation occurs through a combination of leaky scanning and translation re-initiation and the presence of an intact uORF decreases the extent of global A3G translation under normal conditions. Interestingly, the uORF is also absolutely required for Vif-mediated translation inhibition and redirection of A3G mRNA into stress granules. Overall, we discovered that A3G translation is regulated by a small uORF conserved in the human population and that Vif uses this specific feature to repress its translation.}, language = {en} } @article{IsaacsMikasiObasaetal.2020, author = {Isaacs, Darren and Mikasi, Sello Given and Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel and Ikomey, George Mondinde and Shityakov, Sergey and Cloete, Ruben and Jacobs, Graeme Brendon}, title = {Structural comparison of diverse HIV-1 subtypes using molecular modelling and docking analyses of integrase inhibitors}, series = {Viruses}, volume = {12}, journal = {Viruses}, number = {9}, issn = {1999-4915}, doi = {10.3390/v12090936}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-211170}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) having been approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Due to high HIV-1 diversity, it is not well understood how specific naturally occurring polymorphisms (NOPs) in IN may affect the structure/function and binding affinity of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). We applied computational methods of molecular modelling and docking to analyze the effect of NOPs on the full-length IN structure and INSTI binding. We identified 13 NOPs within the Cameroonian-derived CRF02_AG IN sequences and further identified 17 NOPs within HIV-1C South African sequences. The NOPs in the IN structures did not show any differences in INSTI binding affinity. However, linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the Ki and EC50 values for DTG and BIC as strong inhibitors of HIV-1 IN subtypes. All INSTIs are clinically effective against diverse HIV-1 strains from INSTI treatment-na{\"i}ve populations. This study supports the use of second-generation INSTIs such as DTG and BIC as part of first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens, due to a stronger genetic barrier to the emergence of drug resistance.}, language = {en} }