@article{RahimiBhalaKamphuisenetal.2012,
  author    = {Rahimi, Kazem and Bhala, Neeraj and Kamphuisen, Pieter and Emberson, Jonathan and Biere-Rafi, Sara and Krane, Vera and Robertson, Michele and Wikstrand, John and McMurray, John},
  title     = {Effect of Statins on Venous Thromboembolic Events: A Meta-analysis of Published and Unpublished Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials},
  series = {PLoS Medicine},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PLoS Medicine},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pmed.1001310},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134279},
  pages     = {e1001310},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background: It has been suggested that statins substantially reduce the risk of venous thromboembolic events. We sought to test this hypothesis by performing a meta-analysis of both published and unpublished results from randomised trials of statins. Methods and Findings: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to March 2012 for randomised controlled trials comparing statin with no statin, or comparing high dose versus standard dose statin, with 100 or more randomised participants and at least 6 months' follow-up. Investigators were contacted for unpublished information about venous thromboembolic events during follow-up. Twenty-two trials of statin versus control (105,759 participants) and seven trials of an intensive versus a standard dose statin regimen (40,594 participants) were included. In trials of statin versus control, allocation to statin therapy did not significantly reduce the risk of venous thromboembolic events (465 [0.9\%] statin versus 521 [1.0\%] control, odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95\% CI 0.78-1.01, p = 0.08) with no evidence of heterogeneity between effects on deep vein thrombosis (266 versus 311, OR 0.85, 95\% CI 0.72-1.01) and effects on pulmonary embolism (205 versus 222, OR 0.92, 95\% CI 0.76-1.12). Exclusion of the trial result that provided the motivation for our meta-analysis (JUPITER) had little impact on the findings for venous thromboembolic events (431 [0.9\%] versus 461 [1.0\%], OR = 0.93 [95\% CI 0.82-1.07], p = 0.32 among the other 21 trials). There was no evidence that higher dose statin therapy reduced the risk of venous thromboembolic events compared with standard dose statin therapy (198 [1.0\%] versus 202 [1.0\%], OR = 0.98, 95\% CI 0.80-1.20, p = 0.87). Risk of bias overall was small but a certain degree of effect underestimation due to random error cannot be ruled out. Conclusions: The findings from this meta-analysis do not support the previous suggestion of a large protective effect of statins (or higher dose statins) on venous thromboembolic events. However, a more moderate reduction in risk up to about one-fifth cannot be ruled out. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FruchartDavignonHermansetal.2014,
  author    = {Fruchart, Jean-Charles and Davignon, Jean and Hermans, Michael P. and Al-Rubeaan, Khalid and Amarenco, Pierre and Assmann, Gerd and Barter, Philip and Betteridge, John and Bruckert, Eric and Cuevas, Ada and Farnier, Michel and Ferrannini, Ele and Fioretto, Paola and Genest, Jacques and Ginsberg, Henry N. and Gotto Jr., Antonio M. and Hu, Dayi and Kadowaki, Takashi and Kodama, Tatsuhiko and Krempf, Michel and Matsuzawa, Yuji and N{\´u}{\~n}ez-Cort{\´e}s, Jes{\´u}s Mill{\´a}n and Monfil, Calos Calvo and Ogawa, Hisao and Plutzky, Jorge and Rader, Daniel J. and Sadikot, Shaukat and Santos, Raul D. and Shlyakhto, Evgeny and Sritara, Piyamitr and Sy, Rody and Tall, Alan and Tan, Chee Eng and Tokg{\"o}zoğlu, Lale and Toth, Peter P. and Valensi, Paul and Wanner, Christoph and Zambon, Albertro and Zhu, Junren and Zimmet, Paul},
  title     = {Residual macrovascular risk in 2013: what have we learned?},
  series = {Cardiovascual Diabetology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cardiovascual Diabetology},
  number    = {26},
  issn      = {1475-2840},
  doi       = {10.1186/1475-2840-13-26},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117546},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Cardiovascular disease poses a major challenge for the 21st century, exacerbated by the pandemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. While best standards of care, including high-dose statins, can ameliorate the risk of vascular complications, patients remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R(3)i) has previously highlighted atherogenic dyslipidaemia, defined as the imbalance between proatherogenic triglyceride-rich apolipoprotein B-containing-lipoproteins and antiatherogenic apolipoprotein A-I-lipoproteins (as in high-density lipoprotein, HDL), as an important modifiable contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk, especially in insulin-resistant conditions. As part of its mission to improve awareness and clinical management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the R(3)i has identified three key priorities for action: i) to improve recognition of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in patients at high cardiometabolic risk with or without diabetes; ii) to improve implementation and adherence to guideline-based therapies; and iii) to improve therapeutic strategies for managing atherogenic dyslipidaemia. The R(3)i believes that monitoring of non-HDL cholesterol provides a simple, practical tool for treatment decisions regarding the management of lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk. Addition of a fibrate, niacin (North and South America), omega-3 fatty acids or ezetimibe are all options for combination with a statin to further reduce non-HDL cholesterol, although lacking in hard evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefits. Several emerging treatments may offer promise. These include the next generation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonists, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors and monoclonal antibody therapy targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. However, long-term outcomes and safety data are clearly needed. In conclusion, the R(3)i believes that ongoing trials with these novel treatments may help to define the optimal management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce the clinical and socioeconomic burden of residual cardiovascular risk.},
  language  = {en}
}