@phdthesis{Dehmer2024,
  author    = {Dehmer, Markus},
  title     = {A novel USP11-TCEAL1-mediated mechanism protects transcriptional elongation by RNA Polymerase II},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-36054},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-360544},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Deregulated expression of MYC oncoproteins is a driving event in many human cancers. Therefore, understanding and targeting MYC protein-driven mechanisms in tumor biology remain a major challenge. Oncogenic transcription in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma leads to the formation of the MYCN-BRCA1-USP11 complex that terminates transcription by evicting stalling RNAPII from chromatin. This reduces cellular stress and allows reinitiation of new rounds of transcription. Basically, tumors with amplified MYC genes have a high demand on well orchestration of transcriptional processes-dependent and independent from MYC proteins functions in gene regulation. To date, the cooperation between promoter-proximal termination and transcriptional elongation in cancer cells remains still incomplete in its understanding. In this study the putative role of the dubiquitinase Ubiquitin Specific Protease 11 (USP11) in transcription regulation was further investigated. First, several USP11 interaction partners involved in transcriptional regulation in neuroblastoma cancer cells were identified. In particular, the transcription elongation factor A like 1 (TCEAL1) protein, which assists USP11 to engage protein-protein interactions in a MYCN-dependent manner, was characterized. The data clearly show that TCEAL1 acts as a pro-transcriptional factor for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-medi- ated transcription. In detail, TCEAL1 controls the transcription factor S-II (TFIIS), a factor that assists RNAPII to escape from paused sites. The findings claim that TCEAL1 outcompetes the transcription elongation factor TFIIS in a non-catalytic manner on chromatin of highly expressed genes. This is reasoned by the need regulating TFIIS function in transcription. TCEAL1 equili- brates excessive backtracking and premature termination of transcription caused by TFIIS. Collectively, the work shed light on the stoichiometric control of TFIIS demand in transcriptional regulation via the USP11-TCEAL1-USP7 complex. This complex protects RNAPII from TFIIS-mediated termination helping to regulate productive transcription of highly active genes in neuroblastoma.},
  subject      = {Transkription},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Vellmer2022,
  author    = {Vellmer, Tim},
  title     = {New insights into the histone variant H2A.Z incorporation pathway in \(Trypanosoma\) \(brucei\)},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-25796},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-257960},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The histone variant H2A.Z is a key player in transcription regulation in eukaryotes. Histone acetylations by the NuA4/TIP60 complex are required to enable proper incorporation of the histone variant and to promote the recruitment of other complexes and proteins required for transcription initiation. The second key player in H2A.Z-mediated transcription is the chromatin remodelling complex SWR1, which replaces the canonical histone H2A with its variant. By the time this project started little was known about H2A.Z in the unicellular parasite Trypanosoma brucei. Like in other eukaryotes H2A.Z was exclusively found in the transcription start sites of the polycistronic transcription units where it keeps the chromatin in an open conformation to enable RNA-polymerase II-mediated transcription. Previous studies showed the variant colocalizing with an acetylation of lysine on histone H4 and a methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3. Data indicated that HAT2 is linked to H2A.Z since it is required for acetylation of lyinse 10 on histone H4. A SWR1-like complex and a complex homologous to the NuA4/TIP60 could not be identified yet. This study aimed at identifying a SWR1-like remodelling complex in T. brucei and at identifying a protein complex orthologous to NuA4/TIP60 as well as at answering the question whether HAT2 is part of this complex or not. To this end, I performed multiple mass spectrometry-coupled co-Immunoprecipitation assays with potential subunits of a SWR1 complex, HAT2 and a putative homolog of a NuA4/TIP60 subunit. In the course of these experiments, I was able to identify the TbSWR1 complex. Subsequent cell fractionation and chromatin immunoprecipitation-coupled sequencing analysis experiments confirmed, that this complex is responsible for the incorporation of the histone variant H2A.Z in T. brucei. In addition to this chromatin remodelling complex, I was also able to identify two histone acetyltransferase complexes assembled around HAT1 and HAT2. In the course of my study data were published by the research group of Nicolai Siegel that identified the histone acetyltransferase HAT2 as being responsible for histone H4 acetylation, in preparation to promote H2A.Z incorporation. The data also indicated that HAT1 is responsible for acetylation of H2A.Z. According to the literature, this acetylation is required for proper transcription initiation. Experimental data generated in this study indicated, that H2A.Z and therefore TbSWR1 is involved in the DNA double strand break response of T. brucei. The identification of the specific complex composition of all three complexes provided some hints about how they could interact with each other in the course of transcription regulation and the DNA double strand break response. A proximity labelling approach performed with one of the subunits of the TbSWR1 complex identified multiple transcription factors, PTM writers and proteins potentially involved in chromatin maintenance. Overall, this work will provide some interesting insights about the composition of the complexes involved in H2A.Z incorporation in T. brucei. Furthermore, it is providing valuable information to set up experiments that could shed some light on RNA-polymerase II-mediated transcription and chromatin remodelling in T. brucei in particular and Kinetoplastids in general.},
  subject      = {Chromatinremodelling},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Schmit2008,
  author    = {Schmit, Fabienne},
  title     = {LINC, a novel protein complex involved in the regulation of G2/M genes},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-29336},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Regulated progression through the cell cycle is essential for ordered cell proliferation. One of the best characterized tumor suppressors is the retinoblastoma protein pRB, which together with the E2F transcription factors regulates cell cycle progression. In the model organisms Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, RB/E2F containing multiprotein complexes have been described as transcriptional regulators of gene expression. This work first describes a homologous complex in human cells named LINC (for LIN complex). It consists of a stable core complex containing LIN-9, LIN-37, LIN-52, LIN-54 and RbAp48. This core complex interacts cell cycle-dependently with different pocket proteins and transcription factors. In quiescent cells, LINC associates with p130 and E2F4. In S-phase cells these interactions are lost and LINC binds to B-MYB and p107. The transient knock-down of LIN-54 in primary fibroblasts, as the depletion of LIN-9, leads to cell cycle defects. The cells are delayed before the entry into mitosis. This effect is due to the fact that the knock-down of LINC components leads to the downregulation of cell cycle genes responsible for the entry into and exit from mitosis as well as for checkpoints during mitosis. These LINC target genes are known E2F G2/M target genes, which are expressed later than the classical G1/S E2F target genes. The transcriptional regulation by LINC is a direct effect as LINC binds to the promoters of its target genes throughout the cell cycle. LINC contains three DNA-binding proteins. E2F4 and B-MYB, which cell cycle-dependently bind to LINC, are known DNA-binding transcription factors. Additionally, it is show here that the LINC core complex member LIN-54 also directly binds to the promoter of a LINC target gene. Although the exact molecular mechanism of LINC function needs to be analyzed further, data in this work provide a model for the delayed activation of G2/M target genes. B-MYB, a G1/S E2F target gene, binds to LINC upon its expression in S-phase. Then only LINC is a transcriptional activator that induces the expression of the G2/M genes. This provides an explanation for the delayed expression of these E2F G2/M target genes.},
  subject      = {Zellzyklus},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Spohn1999,
  author    = {Spohn, Gunther},
  title     = {The transcriptional control of virulence gene expression in Helicobacter pylori},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-2334},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {1999},
  abstract  = {The Gram-negative, spiral-shaped, microaerophilic bacterium Helicobacter pylori is the causative agent of various disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as chronic superficial gastritis, chronic active gastritis, peptic ulceration and adenocarcinoma. Although many of the bacterial factors associated with disease development have been analysed in some detail in the recent years, very few studies have focused so far on the mechanisms that regulate expression of these factors at the molecular level. In an attempt to obtain an overview of the basic mechanisms of virulence gene expression in H. pylori, three important virulence factors of this pathogen, representative of different pathogenic mechanisms and different phases of the infectious process, are investigated in detail in the present thesis regarding their transcriptional regulation. As an essential factor for the early phase of infection, including the colonisation of the gastric mucosa, the flagella are analysed; the chaperones including the putative adhesion factors GroEL and DnaK are investigated as representatives of the phase of adherence to the gastric epithelium and persistence in the mucus layer; and finally the cytotoxin associated antigen CagA is analysed as representative of the cag pathogenicity island, which is supposed to account for the phenomena of chronic inflammation and tissue damage observed in the later phases of infection. RNA analyses and in vitro transcription demonstrate that a single promoter regulates expression of cagA, while two promoters are responsible for expression of the upstream divergently transcribed cagB gene. All three promoters are shown to be recognised by RNA polymerase containing the vegetative sigma factor sigma 80. Promoter deletion analyses establish that full activation of the cagA promoter requires sequences up to -70 and binding of the C-terminal portion of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase to an UP-like element located between -40 and -60, while full activation of the major cagB promoter requires sequences upstream of -96 which overlap with the cagA promoter. These data suggest that the promoters of the pathogenicity island represent a class of minimum promoters, that ensure a basic level of transcription, while full activation requires regulatory elements or structural DNA binding proteins that provide a suitable DNA context. Regarding flagellar biosynthesis, a master transcriptional factor is identified that regulates expression of a series of flagellar basal body and hook genes in concert with the alternative sigma factor sigma 54. Evidence is provided that this regulator, designated FlgR (for flagellar regulatory protein), is necessary for motility and transcription of five promoters for seven basal body and hook genes. In addition, FlgR is shown to act as a repressor of transcription of the sigma 28-regulated promoter of the flaA gene, while changes in DNA topology are shown to affect transcription of the sigma 54-regulated flaB promoter. These data indicate that the regulatory network that governs flagellar gene expression in H. pylori shows similarities to the systems of both Salmonella spp. and Caulobacter crescentus. In contrast to the flagellar genes which are regulated by three different sigma factors, the three operons encoding the major chaperones of H. pylori are shown to be transcribed by RNA polymerase containing the vegetative sigma factor sigma 80. Expression of these operons is shown to be regulated negatively by the transcriptional repressor HspR, a homologue of a repressor protein of Streptomyces spp., known to be involved in negative regulation of heat shock genes. In vitro studies with purified recombinant HspR establish that the protein represses transcription by binding to large DNA regions centered around the transcription initiation site in the case of one promoter, and around -85 and -120 in the case of the the other two promoters. In contrast to the situation in Streptomyces, where transcription of HspR-regulated genes is induced in response to heat shock, transcription of the HspR-dependent genes in H. pylori is not inducible with thermal stimuli. Transcription of two of the three chaperone encoding operons is induced by osmotic shock, while transcription of the third operon, although HspR-dependent, is not affected by salt treatment. Taken together, the analyses carried out indicate that H. pylori has reduced its repertoire of specific regulatory proteins to a basic level that may ensure coordinate regulation of those factors that are necessary during the initial phase of infection including the passage through the gastric lumen and the colonisation of the gastric mucosa. The importance of DNA topology and/or context for transcription of many virulence gene promoters may on the other hand indicate, that a sophisticated global regulatory network is present in H. pylori, which influences transcription of specific subsets of virulence genes in response to changes in the microenvironment.},
  subject      = {Helicobacter-pylori-Infektion},
  language  = {en}
}